Reducing lesion aberration by dual-frequency focused ultrasound ablations

Reference

• Blana A, Walter B, Rogenhofer S, Wieland WF. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology 2004; 63: 297–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JE. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 321–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnese DM, Burak WE, Jr. Ablative approaches to the minimally invasive treatment of breast cancer. Cancer J 2005; 11: 77–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F. Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of patients with solid malignancy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2006; 15: 26–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, Freund WR, Cline HE, Chung AH, Watkins RD, Vetro JP, Jolesz FA. A clinical, noninvasive, MR imaging-monitored ultrasound surgery method. Radiographics 1996; 16: 185–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolesz FA, Hynynen K, McDannold N, Tempany C. MR imaging-controlled focused ultrasound ablation: A noninvasive image-guided surgery. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13: 545–560
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lizzi FL, Coleman DJ, Driller J, Silverman R, Lucas B, Rosado A. A therapeutic ultrasound system incorporating real-time ultrasonic scanning. Proc Ultrason Symp IEEE 1986; 981–984
   Google Scholar
• Vaezy S, Shi X, Martin RW, Chi E, Nelson PI, Bailey MR, Crum LA. Real-time visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment using ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 33–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller NR, Bamber JC, ter Haar GR. Imaging of temperature-induced echo strain: Preliminary in vitro study to assess feasibility for guiding focused ultrasound surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 345–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong H, Wan M, Jiang Y, Wang S. Differential ultrasonic imaging for the characterization of lesions induced by high intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasonics 2006; 44: e285–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline HE, Hynynen K, Hardy CJ, Watkins RD, Schenck JF, Jolesz FA. MR temperature mapping of focused ultrasound surgery. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31: 628–636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal CM, Brown GM, Bahn RC, Greenleaf JF. Measurement and use of acoustic nonlinearity and sound speed to estimate composition of excised livers. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986; 12: 865–874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seip R, Ebbini ES. Noninvasive estimation of tissue temperature response to heating fields using diagnostic ultrasound. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995; 42: 828–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribault M, Chapelon JY, Cathignol D, Gelet A. Differential attenuation imaging for the characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound lesions. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20: 160–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Vaezy S. An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 610–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thittai AK, Galaz B, Ophir J. Visualization of HIFU-induced lesion boundaries by axial-shear strain elastography: A feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 426–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MR, Couret LN, Sapozhnikov OA, Khokhlova VA, ter Haar G, Vaezy S, Shi X, Martin R, Crum LA. Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 695–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen NR, Bailey MR, Hossack J, Crum LA. A method to synchronize high-intensity, focused ultrasound with an arbitrary ultrasound imager. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006; 53: 645–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takegami K, Kaneko Y, Watanabe T, Maruyama T, Matsumoto Y, Nagawa H. Polyacrylamide gel containing egg white as new model for irradiation experiments using focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 1419–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafon C, Zderic V, Noble ML, Yuen JC, Kaczkowski PJ, Sapozhnikov OA, Chavrier F, Crum LA, Vaezy S. Gel phantom for use in high-intensity focused ultrasound dosimetry. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1383–1389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung YS, Liu HL, Wu CC, Ju KC, Chen WS, Lin WL. Contrast-agent-enhanced ultrasound thermal ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1103–1110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohlhammer JD, Edwards CA, O'Brien JWD. Phase insensitive ultrasonic attenuation coefficient determination of fresh bovine liver over an extended frequency range. Med Phys 1981; 8: 692–694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divkovic GW, Liebler M, Braun K, Dreyer T, Huber PE, Jenne JW. Thermal properties and changes of acoustic parameters in an egg white phantom during heating and coagulation by high intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 981–986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WS, Lafon C, Matula TJ, Vaezy S, Crum LA. Mechanisms of lesion formation in high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Acoust Res Lett Online 2003; 4: 41–46
   Google Scholar
• Khokhlova VA, Bailey MR, Reed JA, Cunitz BW, Kaczkowski PJ, Crum LA. Effects of nonlinear propagation, cavitation, and boiling in lesion formation by high intensity focused ultrasound in a gel phantom. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 1834–1848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin BA, Zderic V, Vaezy S. Hyperecho in ultrasound images of HIFU therapy: Involvement of cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 947–956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin BA, Zderic V, Crum LA, Vaezy S. Biological and physical mechanisms of HIFU-induced hyperecho in ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1721–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavrier F, Chapelon JY, Gelet A, Cathignol D. Modeling of high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced lesions in the presence of cavitation bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 432–440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HL, Chen YY, Chen WS, Shih TC, Chen JS, Lin WL. Interactions between consecutive sonications for characterizing the thermal mechanism in focused ultrasound therapy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1411–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WS, Wu CC, Fang HY, Liu HL. Differences in the lesion formation process between focused ultrasound and microwave ablations. Med Phys 2006; 33: 1346–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He PZ, Xia RM, Duan SM, Shou WD, Qian DC. The affection on the tissue lesions of difference frequency in dual-frequency high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Ultrason Sonochem 2006; 13: 339–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang SL, Hu B, Jiang LX, He PZ, Xia RM, Shou WD. Confocal dual-frequency enhances the damaging effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound in tissue-mimicking phantom. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008; 17: 285–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokka SD, Gauthier TP, Hynynen K. Theoretical and experimental validation of a dual-frequency excitation method for spatial control of cavitation. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 2167–2179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HL, Chen WS, Chen JS, Shih TC, Chen YY, Lin WL. Cavitation-enhanced ultrasound thermal therapy by combined low- and high-frequency ultrasound exposure. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 759–767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar