Minimally invasive microsurgical resection of primary, intradural spinal tumours using a tubular retraction system

References

• Schellinger KA, Propp JM, Villano JL, McCarthy BJ. Descriptive epidemiology of primary spinal cord tumors. J Neurooncol 2008;87:173–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou SM, Eggert HR, Laborde G, Seeger W. icrosurgical unilateral approaches for spinal tumour surgery: eight years’ experience in 256 primary operated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989;100:127–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen CM, Kolstad F, Hald J, . Long-term outcome after resection of intraspinal ependymomas: report of 86 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 2010;67:1622–33; discussion 1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktem IS, Akdemir H, Kurtsoy A, Ko RK, Menk A, Tucer B. Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal lesions. Spinal Cord 2000;38:92–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samii M, Klekamp J. Surgical results of 100 intramedullary tumors in relation to accompanying syringomyelia. Neurosurgery. 1994;35:865–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2598–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagelopoulos PJ, Peterson HA, Ebersold MJ, Emmanuel PR, Choudhury SN, Quast LM. Spinal column deformity and instability after lumbar or thoracolumbar laminectomy for intraspinal tumors in children and young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:442–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljärvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:575–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B, Mimran RI, Jacob RP. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: The minimally invasive versus the “classic” open approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008;51:100–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okawa A, Shinomiya K, Takakuda K, Nakai O. A cadaveric study on the stability of lumbar segment after partial laminotomy and facetectomy with intact posterior ligaments. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:518–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panjabi MM, White AA, III. Basic biomechanics of the spine. Neurosurgery 1980;7:76–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuoka S, Peterson HA, Laws ER Jr, MacCarty CS. Pathogenesis and prophylaxis of postlaminectomy deformity of the spine after multiple level laminectomy: Difference between children and adults. Neurosurgery 1981;9:145–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoda H, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Dohzono S, Kato M, Matsuda H. Clinical outcome of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:410–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thome C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, . Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3:129–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion RJ, Nowitzke AM, Efendy J, Wood MJ. Safety and efficacy of intradural extramedullary spinal tumor removal using a minimally invasive approach. Neurosurgery 2011;68:208–16; discussion 216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tredway TL, Santiago P, Hrubes MR, Song JK, Christie SD, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive resection of intradural-extramedullary spinal neoplasms. Neurosurgery 2006;58:ONS52–58; discussion ONS58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen CM, Lied B, Harr ME, . Surgical mortality and complications leading to reoperation in 318 consecutive posterior decompressions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurol Scand 2011;123:358–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleeng B, Helseth E. [Resection of symptomatic intraspinal meningiomas]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2008;128:818–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown MD, Brookfield KF. A randomized study of closed wound suction drainage for extensive lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:1066–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzai H, Eminoglu M, Orguc S. Are drains useful for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, randomized clinical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:171–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom A, Burgel U, Reinacher P . A less invasive surgical concept for the resection of spinal meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150:551–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper PR, Epstein F. Radical resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in adults. Recent experience in 29 patients. J Neurosurg 1985;63:492–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• el-Mahdy W, Kane PJ, Powell MP, Crockard HA. Spinal intradural tumours: part I–Extramedullary. Br J Neurosurg 1999;13:550–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson MD, Simpson C, Nicholas RS, Miles J, Findlay GF, Pigott TJ. Outcome predictors and complications in the management of intradural spinal tumours. Eur Spine J 2006;15:203–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane PJ, el-Mahdy W, Singh A, Powell MP, Crockard HA. Spinal intradural tumours: part II–Intramedullary. Br J Neurosurg 1999;13:558–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar