Day case lumbar discectomy – Viable option in the UK?

References

• Peul WC, Hout WB, Brand R, Thomeer RT, Koes BW. Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336:1355–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson AM, Blood EA, Frymoyer JW, et al. SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain. Does treatment, location, or morphology matter?. Spine 2008;33:428–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome RJ, May S, Chiverton N, Cole AA. A prospective, randomised trial of immediate exercise following lumbar microdiscectomy: A preliminary study. Physiotherapy 2009;95:273–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Türeyen K. One-level one-sided lumbar disc surgery with and without microscopic assistance: 1-year outcome in 114 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg (Spine 3) 2003;99:247–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, El-Kadi H, Bost J. Lumbar microdiscectomy: a historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 2002;13:E3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandy WE. Loose cartilage from intervertebral disk stimulating tumor of the spinal cord. Arch Surg 1929;19:660–72.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrom B. Experience of microsurgical compared with Conventional technique in lumbar disc operations. Acta Neurol Scand 1987;76:129–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffith H, Marks C. Outpatient surgery for prolapsed lumbar disc. Br J Neurosurg 1987;1:105–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanif MA, Norrish AR, Sheikh R, Abdel-Gadir M. The outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy performed as a day case procedure: A comparison of 67 consecutive patients undergoing surgery on a day case or inpatient basis. J One-day Surg 2005;15:74–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Castro A, Nagendar ASK, Greenough CG. Day-case conventional discectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2002;11:67–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitz-Henry J. The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93:185–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock M, Kunkel P, Papavero L. Lumbar microdiscectomy: subperiosteal versus transmuscular approach and influence on the early postoperative analgesic consumption. Eur Spine J 2008;17:518–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly A, Griffith H, Jamjoom A. Results of day-case surgery for lumbar disc prolapse. Br J Neurosurg 1994;8:47–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanalingham KK, Abou-Zeid AH, Jordan D. Day case lumbar microdiscectomy: Is it a viable option in the UK?. Br J Neurosurg 2008;22:166.
   Google Scholar
• Best NM, Sasso RC. Success and safety in outpatient microlumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:334–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal A, Bernstein M. Outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: A prospective study in 122 patients. Can J Neurol Sci 2002;29: 249–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, et al. Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm?. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2002;96: 34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersht M, Massicotte EM, Bernstein M. Patient satisfaction with outpatient lumbar microsurgical discectomy: a qualitative study. Can J Surg 2007;50:445–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah A, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG, et al. Admission and acute complication rate for outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy. Can J Neurol Sci 2010;37:49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson I. Day surgery overview: Where are we now, how did we get here and where are we going?. Curr Anaesthesia Crit Care 2007;18:176–80.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhimani P, Jackson I. UK guidelines for day surgery. Surgery 2006:346–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kjærgaard M, Møiniche S, Olsen KS. Wound infiltration with local anesthetics for post-operative pain relief in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:282–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen S, Krum-Møller DS, Lauridsen LR, et al. Epidural steroid following discectomy for herniated lumbar disc reduces neurological impairment and enhances recovery. A randomized study with two-year follow-up. Spine 2008;33:2028–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German JW, Adamo MA, Hoppenot RG, Blossom JH, Nagle HA. Perioperative results following lumbar discectomy: comparison of minimally invasive discectomy and standard microdiscectomy. Neurosurg Focus 2008:E20.
   Google Scholar
• Ryang YM, Oertel MF, Mayfrank L, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Standard open microdiscectomy versus minimal access trocar microdiscectomy: Results of a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery 2008;62:174–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, et al. Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009;302:149–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotilainen E, Alanen A, Erkintalo M, Helenius H, Valtonen S. Postoperative hematomas after successful lumbar microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Surg Neurol 1994;41:98–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papadoulas S, Konstantinou D, Kourea HP, et al. Vascular injury complicating lumbar disc surgery. A systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:189–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Kershaw AR.The patient's and general practitioners notions of day surgery. J One Day Surg 1991;1:10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Sallam S. Patient satisfaction and postoperative demands on hospital and community services after day surgery. Br J Surg 1994;81:1635–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrow S, Fisher A, Seex DM. General practitioner attitudes to day surgery. J Public Health Med 1994;16:318–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar