Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury

References

• Kraus JF, McArthur DL. Epidemiology of brain injury. Head injury, 4th, P Cooper, JG Golfinos. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York 2000; 1–26
   Google Scholar
• Hartley LL. Cognitive communicative abilities following brain injury: A functional approach. Singular Publishing Group, Inc, San Diego, CA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford J. Mechanisms, recovery, and sequelae of traumatic brain injury: A foundation for the real approach. Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living, J Ponsford, S Sloan, P Snow. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, East Sussex 1995; 1–32
   Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2010; 53, in press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Discourse analysis in traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, S McDonald, L Togher, C Code. Psychology Press, Ltd, Hove, East Sussex 1999; 55–79
   Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J. Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: Towards an understanding. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 397–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 169–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Youse KM, Le KN. Conversational discourse in closed-head injured and non-brain injured adults. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 659–672
   Google Scholar
• Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 769–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: A comparison across two control groups. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 409–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 911–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croker V, McDonald S. Recognition of emotion from facial expression following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 787–799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ietswaart M, Milders M, Crawford JR, Currie D, Scott CL. Longitudinal aspects of emotion recognition in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 148–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Pearce S. Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language 1996; 53: 81–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts A, Douglas J. Interpreting facial expression and communication competence following severe traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2006; 20: 707–722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S. Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 572–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas J. Long-term ability to interpret facial expression after traumatic brain injury and its relation to social integration. Brain and Cognition 2009; 69: 442–449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond FM, Hart T, Bushnik T, Corrigan JD, Sasser H. Change and predictors of change in communication, cognition, and social function between 1 and 5 years after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 314–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 841–848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl M, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P, Shue K, Davies D. The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 15–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10–20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 189–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen IV. Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: A 10–15 year second follow up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1984; 47: 260–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen IV. Late psychosocial outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. Preliminary results of a third follow-up study after 20 years. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1992; 26(suppl)142–152
   Google Scholar
• Kozloff R. Networks of social support and the outcome from severe head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 14–23
   Google Scholar
• Elsass L, Kinsella G. Social interaction following severe closed head injury. Psychological Medicine 1987; 17: 67–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella G, Ford B, Moran C. Survival of social relationships following head injury. International Disability Studies 1989; 11: 9–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crisp R. Personal response to traumatic brain injury: A qualitative study. Disability, Handicap & Society 1993; 8: 393–404
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Dyson M, Foreman P. Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: Does it make a difference?. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 107–118
   Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Spellacy FJ. Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 71–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum J. Friendship in older adulthood. Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research, ML Hummert, JM Wiemann, JF Nussbaum. Sage Publications, Inc, California 1994; 209–225
   Google Scholar
• Burleson BR, Samter W, Lucchetti AE. Similarity in communication values as a predictor friendship choices: Studies of friends and best friends. The Southern Communication Journal 1992; 57: 260–276
   Google Scholar
• Burleson BR, Samter W. Similarity in the communication skills of young adults: Foundations of attraction, friendship, and relationship satisfaction. Communication Reports 1996; 9: 127–139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen MA, Clark AN, Sander AM, Mills MR, Evans G, Kurtz D. Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008; 23: 185–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Dealing with the ‘void’: Traumatic brain injury as a story. Disability & Society 1997; 12: 533–555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Struggling with the labeled self: People with traumatic brain injuries in social settings. Qualitative Health Research 1998; 8: 665–681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holosko MJ, Huege S. Perceived social adjustment and social support among a sample of head injured adults. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1989; 2: 145–154
   Google Scholar
• Muenchberger H, Kendall E, Neal R. Identity transition following traumatic brain injury: A dynamic process of contraction, expansion and tentative balance. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 979–992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson J, Stewart J. Adults with acquired brain injury: Perceptions of their social world. Rehabilitation Nursing 2002; 27: 13–18
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg C, Hawley L, Morey C, Newman J, Cusick C, Harrison-Felix C. Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: Three perspectives. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 425–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago 1967
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1990
   Google Scholar
• Bluff R. Grounded theory: The methodology. Qualitative research in health care, I Holloway. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire 2005; 147–167
   Google Scholar
• Browne J. Grounded theory analysis: Coming to data with questioning minds. Research methods for nursing and health science, 2nd, V Minichiello, G Sullivan, K Greenwood, R Axford. Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW 2004; 624–673
   Google Scholar
• Morse J, Richards L. Read me first for a user's guide to qualitative methods. Sage Publications, Inc, California 2002
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn G, Sullivan G, Minichiello V. Sampling in qualitative research. Research methods for nursing and health science, 2nd, V Minichiello, G Sullivan, K Greenwood, R Axford. Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW 2004; 210–241
   Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: Insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 1181–1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichiello V, Madison J, Hays T, Parmenter G. Doing qualitative in-depth interviews. Research methods for nursing and health science, 2nd, V Minichiello, G Sullivan, K Greenwood, R Axford. Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW 2004; 411–446
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc, , CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Quality in qualitative health research. Qualitative research in health care, 2nd, C Pope, N Mays. BMJ Publishing Group, London 2000; 89–101
   Google Scholar
• Finset A, Dyrnes S, Krogstad JM, Berstad J. Self-reported social networks and interpersonal support 2 years after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 141–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J, Strong J. A longitudinal study of self-awareness: Functional deficits underestimated by persons with brain injury. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1999; 19: 3–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L. Giving information: The importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 365–390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Self coaching: A context sensitive, person-centred approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 246–258
   Google Scholar
• Karlovits T, McColl M. Coping with community reintegration after severe brain injury: A description of stresses and coping strategies. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 845–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey H, Shum D. Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 433–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilov AM, Togher L, Grant S. Problem solving with friends: Discourse participation and performance of individuals with and without traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2009; 23: 584–605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar