Changes in supervision needs following participation in a residential post-acute brain injury rehabilitation programme

References

• Boake C. Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 765–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Millis S, Novack T, Englander J, Fidler-Sheppard R, Bell KR. The relationship between neuropsychologic function and level of caregiver supervision at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 8: 221–230
   Google Scholar
• Marsh N, Kersel D, Havill J, Sleigh J. Caregiver burden at 6 months following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 225–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazaic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up community-based individuals. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001; 82: 367–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL. Assessing support needs for people with traumatic brain injury: The care and needs scale (CANS). Brain Injury 2004; 18: 445–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Rutherford NA. Psychosocial adjustment 17 years after severe brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2006; 77: 71–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englander J, Cifu D, Wright JM, Black K. The association of early computed tomography scan findings and ambulation, self-care, and supervision needs at rehabilitation discharge and at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 214–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AW, Malec JF, McClelland RL, Diehl NN, Englander J, Cifu DX. Clinical elements that predict outcome after traumatic brain injury: A prospective multicenter recursive partitioning (decision-tree) analysis. Journal of Neurotrauma 2005; 22: 1040–1051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills VM, Karas A, Alexander MP. Outpatient rehabilitation of patients with chronic cognitive impairments after ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms reduces the burden of care: A pilot study. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1183–1188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DN, Cole JR, Hall KM, Barkan H. Brain injury: Analysis of outcome in a post-acute rehabilitation system. Part 1: General analysis. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 111–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• High WM, Roebuck-Spencer T, Sander AM, Struchen MA, Sherer M. Early versus later admission to postacute rehabilitation: Impact on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006; 87: 334–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson NS, Follette WC, Revenstorf D. Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy 1984; 15: 336–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale GS, Caroselli JS, High WM, Becker CL, Neese CL, Scheibel R. Use of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) to characterize changes in functioning for individuals with traumatic brain injury who participated in a post-acute rehabilitation programme. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 955–967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Lewis FD. Outcomes of community re-entry programmes for brain injury survivors. Part 1: Independent living and productive activities. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 141–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jennett B, Teasdale G. Management of head injuries. Pergamon, Philidelphia 1981
   Google Scholar
• Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Luders H, Sedlak J, Awad IA. Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology 1993; 7: 41–52
   Google Scholar
• Sawrie SM, Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Luders HO. Empirical methods for assessing meaningful neuropsychological change following epilepsy surgery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1996; 2: 556–564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermann BP, Seidenberg M, Schoenfeld J, Peterson J, Leveroni C, Wyler AR. Empirical techniques for determining the reliability, magnitude, and pattern of neuropsychological change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 1996; 37: 942–950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991; 59: 12–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Basford JS. Postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 198–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DN. The effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A review. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 649–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High WM, Boake C, Lehmkuhl LD. Critical analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995; 10: 14–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar