Individualized vs. global assessments of quality of life after head injury and their susceptibility to response shift

References

• Dijkers M. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: A review of research approaches and findings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85(4 Suppl. 2)S21–S35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadorn DC, Uebersax J. Large scale health outcomes evaluation: How should quality of life be measured? Part I—Calibration of a brief questionnaire and a search for preference solutions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995; 48: 607–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadorn DC, Sorensen J, Holte J. Large-scale health outcomes evaluation: How should quality of life be measured? Part II—Questionnaire validation in a cohort of patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995; 48: 619–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Individualization in quality of life measurement: Instruments and approaches. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: S3–S14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey A, Bury G, O’Boyle C, Bradley F, O’Kelly F, Shannon W. A new short-form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. British Medical Journal 1996; 313: 29–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Vasseur SA, Green S, Talman P. The SEIQoL-DW is a valid method for measuring individual quality of life in stroke survivors attending a secondary prevention clinic. Quality of Life Research 2005; 14: 779–788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moons P, Marquet K, Budts W, De Geest S. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the ‘Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life - Direct Weighting’ (SEIQoL-DW) in congenital heart disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mountain L, Campbell S, Seymour D, Primrose W, Whyte M. Assessment of individual quality of life using the SEIQoL-DW in older medical patients. Quarterly Journal of Medicine 2004; 97: 519–524
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle CA, McGee HM, Hickey A, O’Malley K, Joyce C. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. The Lancet 1992; 339: 1088–1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moules S, Chandler BJ. A study of the health and social needs of carers of traumatically brain injured individuals served by one community rehabilitation team. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 983–993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey A, O’Boyle C, McGee HM, McDonald NJ. The relationship between post-trauma problem reporting and carer quality of life after severe head injury. Psychology and Health 1997; 12: 827–838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner J, Abbott G, Lett S. Age related differences in individual quality of life domains in youth with type 1 diabetes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Layte R, Wright L, Coulter A, The UK. SF-36: An analysis and interpretation manual. Health Services Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford 1996
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond A, Snaith R. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983; 67: 361–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Pettigrew L, Teasdale G. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 573–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprangers M, Schwartz C. Integrating response shift into health related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48: 1507–1515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson I. Clinical understanding and clinical implications of response shift. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48: 1577–1588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korfage I, de Koning H, Essink-Bot M-L. Response Shift due to diagnosis and primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: A then test and a vignette study. Quality of Life Research 2007; 16: 1627–1634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe L, Butow P, Smith C, McConnell D, Clarke S. Changes in quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Evidence of response shift and response restriction. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2005; 58: 497–504
   Google Scholar
• Echteld MA, Deliens L, Ooms ME, Ribbe MW, van der Wal G. Quality of life change and response shift in patients admitted to palliative care units: A pilot study. Palliative Medicine 2005; 19: 381–388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daltroy L, Larson M, Eaton H, Phillips C, Liang M. Discrepancies between self-reported and observed physical function in the elderly: The influence of response shift and other factors. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48: 1549–1561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapkin B, Schwartz C. Toward a theoretical model of quality of life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Outcomes 2004; 2: 14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ring L, Höfer S, Heuston F, Harris D, O’Boyle C. Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): The example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees J, Clarke M, Waldron D, O’Boyle C, Ewings P, MacDonagh R. The measurement of response shift in patients with advanced prostate cancer and their partners. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman G. Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Quality of Life Research 2003; 12: 239–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt J, Folstein MF. Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc, Lutz, FL 2003
   Google Scholar
• Steadman-Pare D, Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Vernich L. Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001; 16: 330–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Quality of life measurement in health care. A review of measures and population norms for the UK SF-36. Health Services Research Unit, Oxford 1993
   Google Scholar
• Findler M, Cantor J, Haddad L, Gordon W, Ashman T. The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 715–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan-Goodinson R, Ponsford J, Schönberger M. Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess depression and anxiety following traumatic brain injury as compared with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Journal of Affective Disorders 2009; 114: 94–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins N, Cloherty ME, Gracey F, Evans JJ. The factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1235–1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann C. International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale—a review of validation data and clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1997; 42: 17–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale—an updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2002; 52: 69–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron D, O’Boyle CA, Kearney M, Moriarty M, Carney D. Quality of life measurement in advanced cancer: Assessing the individual. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1999; 17: 3603–3611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Azulay J. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007; 22: 257–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales, 3rd. Open University Press, Berkshire 2005
   Google Scholar
• Mailhan L, Azouvi P, Dazord A. Life satisfaction and disability after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 227–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare L, Halligan PW. Editorial: Pathologies of awareness: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2006; 16: 353–355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BA. Developing constructive revaluation of life with a disability. Rehabilitation Literature 1980; 41: 274–279
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees J, Waldron D, O’Boyle C, Ewings P, MacDonagh R. Prospective vs retrospective assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with advanced prostate cancer: The effect of ‘response shift’. British Journal of Urology International 2003; 92: 703–706
   Google Scholar
• Wright BA. Physical disability—a psychological approach. Harper and Row, New York and Evanston 1960
   Google Scholar