Active versus passive management of post-acquired brain injury challenging behaviour: A case study analysis of multiple operant procedures in the treatment of challenging behaviour maintained by negative reinforcement

References

• Cope DN. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation outcome studies in the United States. Brain injury and neuropsychological rehabilitation, international perspectives, AL Christensen, BP Hazzell. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ 1994; 201–220
   Google Scholar
• Eames P, Wood RLl. Rehabilitation after severe brain injury: A follow-up study of a behaviour modification approach. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 613–619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N. Management of challenging behaviour. In: Wood RL 1st, McMillan T, editors. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury. Hove: Psychology Press; 2001. p 175–208.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen IV. Late psychosocial outcome in severe blunt head trauma. Brain Injury 1984; 1: 131–143
   Google Scholar
• Weddel R, Oddy M, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after rehabilitation: A two year follow-up of patients with severe head injury. Psychological Medicine 1980; 10: 257–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks DN, McKinlay W, Symington C, Beattie A, Campsie L. The effects of severe head injury upon patient and relative within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 1–13
   Google Scholar
• Johnson R, Balleny H. Behaviour problems after brain injury: Incidence and need for treatment. Clinical Rehabilitation 1996; 10: 173–181
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay WW, Brooks DN, Bond MR, Martinage DP, Marshall MM. The short term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by the relatives of the injured person. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1981; 44: 527–533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy M, Coughlan T, Tyerman A, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 564–568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E, Cruzat A. A note on the effects of irrelevant information on task performance after mild and severe head injury. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1981; 20: 69–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke HH, Wesolowski MD, Lane I. A positive approach to the treatment of aggressive brain injured clients. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1988; 11: 235–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel MT, Ferguson RJ. Differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) to reduce aggressive behavior following traumatic brain injury. Behavior Modification 2000; 24: 94–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwata BA. Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: An emerging technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1987; 20: 361–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N. Contemporary approaches to the management of irritability and aggression following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2003; 13: 211–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N. Disorders of behaviour. Cognitive and behavioural rehabilitation: From neurobiology to clinical practice, J Ponsford. Guilford Press, New York 2004; 269–298
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L, Coehlo C, Yorkston K, Kennedy M, Sohlberg MM, Avery J. Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: A systematic review of the evidence. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 769–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Brain injury rehabilitation: A neurobehavioural approach. Croom Helm, London 1987
   Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Worthington AD. Neurobehavioural rehabilitation: A conceptual paradigm. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury, RL Wood, T McMillan. Psychology Press, Hove 2001; 107–132
   Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Worthington AD. Neurobehavioural rehabilitation in practice. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury, RL Wood, T McMillan. Psychology Press, Hove 2001; 133–156
   Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Knight C. The effectiveness of DRL in the management and treatment of severe behaviour disorders following brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 79–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Burgess P. A comparison of treatment methods for behaviour disorders following herpes simplex encephalitis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1994; 4: 31–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N. The treatment of avoidance behaviour following severe brain injury by satiation through negative practice. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 77–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alderman N, Knight C, Henman C. Aggressive behaviours observed within a neurobehavioural rehabilitation service: Utility of the OAS-MNR in clinical audit and applied research. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 469–489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd ed. (WAIS-3®). Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, TX 1997
   Google Scholar
• Warrington EK. Recognition memory test. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan AK, Hollows SE. The Adult Memory and Information Processing Battery (AMIPB). Leeds, UK: St James's University Hospital; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983; 67: 361–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Emslie H, Evans JJ, Wilson BW. The Dysexecutive Questionnaire. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome, BA Wilson, N Alderman, PW Burgess, H Emslie, JJ Evans. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1996; 7
   Google Scholar
• Giles GM, Clark-Wilson J. Functional skills training in severe brain injury. Rehabilitation of the severely brain injured adult: A practical approach, 1st, I Fussey, GM Giles. Croom Helm, London 1988; 69–101
   Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Knight C, Morgan C. Use of a modified version of the Overt Aggression Scale in the measurement and assessment of aggressive behaviours following brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 503–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Davies JA, Jones C, McDonnell P. Reduction of severe aggressive behaviour in acquired brain injury: Case studies illustrating clinical use of the OAS-MNR in the management of challenging behaviours. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 669–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson C, Rutterford N, Shortland D, Williamson N, Alderman N. Reduction of chronic aggressive behaviour ten years after brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 1003–1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Wood RL. Neuropsychology of behaviour disorders following brain injury. Neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury, RL Wood. Taylor & Francis Ltd, London 1990; 110–132
   Google Scholar
• Tyron WW. A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 1982; 15: 423–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaViga GW, Donnellan AM. Alternatives to punishment: Solving behaviour problems with non-aversive strategies. Irvington Publishers, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Wesolowski MD, Zencius A, Burke WH. Effects of feedback and behaviour contracting on head trauma persons’ inappropriate sexual behaviour. Behaviour Residential Treatment 1993; 8: 89–96
   Google Scholar
• Knight C, Rutterford N, Alderman N, Swan L. Is accurate self-monitoring necessary for people with acquired neurological problems to benefit from the use of differential reinforcement methods?. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 75–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Statistical analyses for single case experimental design. Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behaviour change, 2nd, PH Barlow, M Hersen. Pergaman, New York 1984; 285–292
   Google Scholar
• Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology, 4th. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics, 2nd. McGraw-Hill, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Alderman N. Central executive deficit and response to operant conditioning methods. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1996; 6: 161–186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Ward A. Behavioural treatment of the dysexecutive syndrome: Reduction of repetitive speech using response cost and cognitive overlearning. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1991; 1: 65–80
   Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Burgess PW. Integrating cognition and behaviour: A pragmatic approach to brain-injury rehabilitation. In: Wood RL lst, Fussey I, editors. Cognitive rehabilitation in perspective. Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis Ltd; 1990. 204–228.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Fry RK, Youngson HA. Improvement of self-monitoring skills, reduction of behaviour disturbance and the dysexecutive syndrome: Comparison of response cost and a new programme of self-monitoring training. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1995; 5: 193–221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow PH, Hersen M, editors. Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behaviour change. 2nd ed. New York: Pergaman; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester D, Hodgkinson A, Casey T. Prolonged, severe behavioural disturbance following traumatic brain injury: What can be done?. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 605–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar