The development of the St Andrew's-Swansea Neurobehavioural Outcome Scale: Validity and reliability of a new measure of neurobehavioural disability and social handicap

References

• Wood RLl. Preface. In: Wood RL lst, editor. Neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wood RLl. Understanding neurobehavioural disability. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury, RLl Wood, T McMillan. Psychology Press, Hove 2001; 3–27
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Seel R, Devany C. Validation of a neurobehavioural functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 116–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satz P, Holsten SG, Uchiyama CL, Shimahara G, Mitrushina MM, Forney DL, Zaucha K, Light R, Asarnow R, Drebing C. Development and evaluation of validity scales for the neuropsychology behaviour and affect profile: A dissembling study. Psychological Assessment 1996; 8: 115–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Drebing C, Satz P, Uchiyama C. Personality change in head trauma: A validity study of the Neuropsychology Behaviour and Affect Profile. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1998; 13: 549–560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RLl, Alderman N, Williams C. Assessment of neurobehavioural disability: A review of existing measures and recommendations for a comprehensive assessment tool. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 905–918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles; the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 349–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbina S. Essentials of psychological testing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey 2004
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Available online at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/, accessed 23 Nov 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SPG, Madden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): Research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens G, Sugarman P, Walker L. HoNOS-secure: A reliable outcome measure for users of secure and forensic mental health services. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2007; 18: 507–514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleminger S, Leigh E, Eames P, Langrell L, Nagraj R, Logsdail S. HoNOS-ABI: A reliable outcome measure of neuropsychiatric sequelae to brain injury?. Psychiatric Bulletin 2005; 29: 53–55
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Turner-Stokes T. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997; 11: 306–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, Pentland B. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM + FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: A psychometric analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1999; 67: 749–754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudofsky SC, Silver JM, Jackson W, Endicott J, Williams DW. The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. American Journal of Psychiatry 1986; 143: 35–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Knight C, Morgan C. Use of a modified version of the Overt Aggression Scale in the measurement and assessment of aggressive behaviours following brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 503–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight C, Alderman N, Johnson C, Green S, Birkett-Swan L, Yorston G. The St Andrew's Sexual Behaviour assessment (SASBA): Development of a standardised recording instrument for the measurement and assessment of challenging sexual behaviour in people with progressive and acquired neurological impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 129–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Emslie H, Evans JJ, Wilson BA. The Dysexecutive Questionnaire. Behavioural sssessment of the dysexecutive syndrome, BA Wilson, N Alderman, PW Burgess, H Emslie, JJ Evans. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds 1996
   Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Wilson BA. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1998; 4: 547–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS. SPSS for Windows Version 16.0.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. WINSTEPS® Rasch measurement computer program. Winsteps.com., Beaverton, OR 2009
   Google Scholar
• Simblett S, Bateman A. Dimensions of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) examined using Rasch analysis. Paper presented at The 7th Symposium on Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Special Interest Group of the World Federation of NeruroRehabilitation. Held in Krakow, Poland; 5–6 July 2010. Abstract published in Brain Impairment 2010;11:204–205.
   Google Scholar
• Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2003; 35: 105–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Wright BD. A user's guide to Bigsteps Winsteps Rasch-Model computer program. MESA Press, Chicago, IL 1998
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Applying the WHO framework to the rehabilitation of patients with cognitive deficits. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for cognitive deficits, PW Halligan, DT Wade. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005
   Google Scholar
• Cooper-Evans S, Alderman N, Knight C, Oddy M. Self-esteem and self-concept as predictors of mood and behaviour during rehabilitation following severe brain injury: An exploratory study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 607–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Outcome measures for inpatient neurorehabilitation settings. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1999; 9: 329–343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RLl. Practice makes perfect: does this reflect 30 years of TBI rehabilitation? Paper presented at conference ‘Thirty Years of Neurobehavioural Rehabilitation: past, present and future’ held in Northampton, UK; 8-9 June 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Eames P, Wood RLl. Rehabilitation after severe brain injury: A follow-up study of a behaviour modification approach. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 613–619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames P, Cotterill G, Kneale TA, Storrar AL, Yeomans P. Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury: A long-term follow-up study. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 631–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RLl, McCrea JD, Wood LM, Merriman RN. Clinical and cost effectiveness of post-acute neurobehavioural rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 69–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington AD, Matthews S, Melia Y, Oddy M. Cost-benefits associated with social outcome from neurobehavioural rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 947–957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, High WM, Goethe KE, Sisson RA, Overall JE, Rhoades HM, Eisenberg HM, Kalisky Z, Gary HE. The neurobehavioural rating scale: Assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1987; 50: 183–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Mazaux J-M, Vanier M, Dartigues JF, Giroire JM, Daverat P, Pilon M, Hebert D, Johnson C, Fournier G. Evaluation des troubles neurophysiologiques et comportementaux des traumatises craniens per le clinicien: Proposition d’une echelle neurocomportementale et premiers resultas de sa version francaise. Annales de Readaption et de Medicine Physique 1990; 33: 35–40
   Google Scholar
• Vanier M, Mazaux J-M, Lambert J, Dassa C, Levin H. Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: Interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale – Revised. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 796–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Devany CW. (Unpublished). Cited in: Weinfurt KP, Willke R, Glick HA, Schulman KA. Towards a composite scoring solution for the neurobehavioural functioning inventory. Quality of Life Research 1999; 8: 17–24
   Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Satz P, Mitushina M, Van Gorp W, Cicchetti D, Lewis R, Van Lacker D. Development and validation of the neuropsychology behaviour and affect profile. Psychological Assessment 1989; 1: 266–272
   Google Scholar
• Kolitz BP, Vanderploeg RD, Curtiss G. Development of the key behaviours change inventory: A traumatic brain injury behavioural outcome assessment instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 277–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey HPD, Partridge FM, Knight RG. Course of insight disorder and emotional dysfunction following closed head injury: A controlled cross-sectional follow up study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1993; 15: 503–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff RM, Hibbard KM. Ruff Neurobehavioural Inventory (RNBI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL 2003
   Google Scholar