A resource of validated affective and neutral sentences to assess identification of emotion in spoken language after a brain injury

References

• Zupan B, Neumann D, Babbage DR, Willer B. The importance of vocal affect to bimodal processing of emotion: Implications for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders 2009; 42: 1–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchinke L, Võ MLH, Hofmann M, Jacobs AM. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007; 65: 132–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers K, Costa A, Thierry G. Tracking lexical access in speech production: Electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex 2010; 20: 912–928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton K, Schwartz R. Working memory capacity and language processes in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1138–1153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemiah JC, Freyberger H, Sifneos PE. Alexithymia: A view of the psychosomatic process. Modern trends in psychosomatic medicine, OW Hill. Butterworth, London 1976; 2: 26–34
   Google Scholar
• Larsen JK, Brand N, Bermond B, Hijman R. Cognitive and emotional characteristics of alexithymia. A review of neurobiological studies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2003; 54: 533–541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JD. The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale–II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1994; 38: 33–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker J, Taylor G, Bagby R. The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2003; 55: 269–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honkalampi K, Hintikka J, Tanskanen A, Lehtonen J, Viinamäki H. Depression is strongly associated with alexithymia in the general population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2003; 48: 99–104
   Google Scholar
• Wise T, Mann L, Hill B. Alexithymia and depressed mood in the psychiatric patient. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 1990; 54: 26–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloitre M, Scarvalone P, Difede J. Posttraumatic stress disorder, self- and interpersonal dysfunction among sexually retraumatized women. Journal of Trauma and Stress 1997; 10: 437–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane C, Brewerton T, Wilson D, Hodges E. Alexithymia in the eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1993; 14: 219–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot J, Rodin G, Olmsted M. Alexithymia, depression, and treatment outcome in bulimia nervosa. Comparative Psychiatry 1995; 36: 53–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke M, Taylor G, Parker J, Bagby R. Alexithymia in women with anorexia nervosa. A preliminary investigation. British Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 161: 240–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haviland MG, Hendryx MS, Shaw DG, Henry JP. Alexithymia in women and men hospitalized for psychoactive substance dependence. Comparative Psychiatry 1994; 35: 124–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louth S, Hare R, Linden W. Psychopathy and alexithymia in female offenders. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 1998; 30: 91–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrovic D, Brown J. Poker mania and problem gambling: A study of distorted cognitions, motivation and alexithymia. Journal of Gambling Studies 2009; 25: 489–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury. A review of research approaches and findings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: S21–S35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milders M, Fuchs S, Crawford JR. Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2003; 25: 157–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry JD, Phillips LH, Crawford JR, Theodorou G, Summers F. Cognitive and psychosocial correlates of alexithymia following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 62–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimoska A, McDonald S, Pell M, Tate R, James C. Recognizing vocal expressions of emotion in patients with social skills deficits following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2010, in press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornhofen C, McDonald S. Emotion perception deficits following traumatic brain injury: A review of the evidence and rationale for intervention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008; 14: 511–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer A. Treatment of motor aprosodia with pitch biofeedback and expression modelling. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 583–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers D, Blonder LX, Heilman KM. Introduction to Florida affect battery revised. University of Florida, Center for Neuropsychological Studies, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory; 1999. Available online at: http://www.neurology.ufl.edu/forms/fab_manual.pdf, accessed 15 April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki S, Jr, Duke M. Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1994; 18: 9–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonks J, Williams W, Frampton I, Yates P, Slater A. Reading emotions after child brain injury: A comparison between children with brain injury and non-injured controls. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 731–739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson A, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Intactness of inhibitory attention mechanisms following severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology 2000; 14: 310–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pell MD, Paulmann S, Dara C, Alasseri A, Kotz SA. Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. Journal of Phonetics 2009; 37: 417–435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ J, Gur R, Bilker W. Validation of affective and neutral sentence content for prosodic testing. Behavioral Research Methods 2008; 40: 935–939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos C, Van Der Kooij E, Crasborn O. Mixed signals: Combining linguistic and affective functions of eyebrows in questions in sign language of the Netherlands. Language and Speech 2009; 52: 2–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty C, West W, Dilley L, Shattuck-Hufnagel S, Caplan D. Question/statement judgments: An fMRI study of intonation processing. Human Brain Mapping 2004; 23: 85–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer K. Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication 2003; 40: 227–256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laukka P. Categorical perception of emotion in vocal expression. Annals of the New-York Academy of Science 2003; 1000: 283–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert R. A method for measuring the sales influence of a radio program. Journal of Applied Psychology 1936; 20: 175–182
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S. Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 572–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris N. Some efficient measures of relative dispersion. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1938; 9: 214–220
   Google Scholar
• Adelman J, Brown G. Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007; 14: 455–459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algom D, Chajut E, Lev S. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004; 133: 323–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen RJ, Mercer KA, Balota DA. Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. Emotion 2006; 6: 62–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes Z, Adelman JS. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). Emotion 2008; 8: 441–444, discussion 445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan TA, Hely CD. The role of valence and frequency in the emotional Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008; 15: 956–960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce A, Harman M, Turner M. Reactions to heard words: Varying emotional content and frequency of exposure. Journal of General Psychology 2007; 134: 67–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott GG, O'Donnell PJ, Leuthold H, Sereno SC. Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology 2009; 80: 95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce PA, Pisoni DB. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 1998; 19: 1–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch MS, Luce P. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1999; 40: 374–408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldinger S, Luce P, Pisoni D. Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 1989; 28: 501–518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler J, Muneaux M, Grainger J. Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language 2003; 48: 779–793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh W, Lidia S, Yap M, Hui Tan S. Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: Neighborhood density and word-frequency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009; 16: 882–887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestam B, Lyxell B, Andersson G. Speech-reading: Cognitive predictors and displayed emotion. Scandinavian Audiology 1999; 28: 211–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addis D, Leclerc C, Muscatell K, Kensinger E. There are age-related changes in neural connectivity during the encoding of positive, but not negative, information. Cortex 2010; 46: 425–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H, Nyberg L, Bäckman L. Age-related differences in brain regions supporting successful encoding of emotional faces. Cortex 2010; 46: 490–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David BM, Chambers C, Daneman M, Pichora-Fuller MK, Reingold E, Schneider BA. Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Speech Lang and Hearing Research 2010, in press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A, Lindfield KC, Goodglass H. Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2000; 43: 915–925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J. Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford Psychological Press, Oxford, U.K. 1995
   Google Scholar
• Garofolo JS. Getting started with the DARPA TIMIT CD-ROM: An acoustic phonetic continuous speech database. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bilger R, Nuetzel J, Rabinowitz W, Rzeczkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984; 27: 32–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant D. The latin square principle in the design and analysis of psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin 1948; 45: 427–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota D, Yap M, Cortese M, Hutchison K, Kessler B, Loftis B, Neely JH, Nelson DL, Simpson GB, Treiman R. The English lexicon project. Behavioral Research Methods 2007; 39: 445–459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund K, Burgess C. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 1996; 28: 203–208
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan N, Srivastava P, Lohani M, Baijal S. Focused and distributed attention. Progress Brain Research 2009; 176: 87–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Hirsh J, Anderson A. Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2007; 104: 383–388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar