Selling the story: Narratives and charisma in adults with TBI

References

• Togher L, McDonald S, Code C. Communication disorders after traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, S McDonald, L Togher, C Code. Psychology Press, Hove 1999; 1–18
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg C, Hawley L, Morey C, Newman J, Cusick CP, Harrison-Felix C. Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: Three perspectives. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 425–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson C, McCabe A. Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child's narrative. Plenum Press, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Labov W. Language in the inner city; studies in the Black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA 1972
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR. Pragmatics and discourse: An introduction. Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults, LR Cherney, BB Shadden, CA Coelho. Aspen Publishers, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 1998; 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan PJ. Models of conversation and narrative: Towards a pedagogic description. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman CK. Narrative analysis: Qualitative research methods. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Langellier K. Personal narratives: Perspectives on theory and research. Text and Performance Quarterly 1989; 9: 243–276
   Google Scholar
• Liles BZ. Narrative discourse in children with language disorders and children with normal language: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 868–882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ripich DN, Griffith PL. Narrative abilities of children with learning-disabilities and nondisabled children: Story structure, cohesion, and propositions. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1988; 21: 165–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich JS. Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1988; 21: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Ylvisaker M, Turkstra LS. Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language 2005; 26: 223–241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Labov W. Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 1997; 7: 395–415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2002; 45: 1232–1248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leer E, Turkstra L. The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders 1999; 32: 327–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov W, Waletzky J. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, J Helm. University of Washington Press, WA 1967; 12–44
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson N. CHP: The conversational historical present in American English narrative. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland 1982
   Google Scholar
• Medved MI, Brockmeier J. Continuity amid chaos: Neurotrauma, loss of memory, and sense of self. Qualitative Health Research 2008; 18: 469–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle KR, McCabe A, Bliss LS. Narrative skills following traumatic brain injury in children and adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1996; 29: 447–469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Discourse analysis in traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, S McDonald, L Togher, C Code. Psychology Press, Ltd., Hove, East SussexUK 1999
   Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Liles B, Duffy R. The use of discourse analyses for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 381–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho CA, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ. Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 471–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liles BZ, Coelho CA, Duffy RJ, Zalagens MR. Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 356–366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan FM, Ashton R. Language performance of severely closed head injured children. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 91–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley L, Jensen P. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 267–285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Three discourse profiles of closed-head-injury speakers: Theoretical and clinical implications. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 271–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stout CE, Yorkston KM, Pimentel JI. Discourse production following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury: A comparison of two tasks. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 2000; 8: 15–25
   Google Scholar
• Tucker FM, Hanlon RE. Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 783–792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones C, Harvey AG, Brewin CR. The organisation and content of trauma memories in survivors of road traffic accidents. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2007; 45: 151–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis M, Prutting CA. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1987; 30: 88–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mentis M, Prutting CA. Analysis of topic as illustrated in a head-injured and a normal adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 583–595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glosser G, Deser T. Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language 1991; 40: 67–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Pragmatic language-skills after closed head-injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language 1993; 44: 28–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis GA, Coelho CA. Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain and Language 2004; 89: 508–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youse KM, Coelho CA. Working memory and discourse production abilities following closed-head injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1001–1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Exchanges of information in the talk of people with traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, S McDonald, L Togher, C Code. Psychology Press, Hove 1999; 113–146
   Google Scholar
• Turkstra L, Ciccia A, Seaton C. Interactive behaviors in adolescent conversation dyads. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 2003; 34: 117–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen MA, Pappadis MR, Mazzei DK, Clark AN, Davis LC, Sander AM. Perceptions of communication abilities for persons with traumatic brain injury: Validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 940–951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Measuring perceived communicative ability after traumatic brain injury: Reliability and validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007; 22: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 911–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naftulin DH, Ware JE, Donnelly FA. Doctor Fox lecture: Paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education 1973; 48: 630–635
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware JE, Williams RG. The Dr. Fox effect: A study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction. Journal of Medical Education 1975; 50: 149–156
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Williams RG. Discriminant analysis of student ratings as a means for identifying lecturers who differ in enthusiasm or information-giving. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1977; 37: 627–639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RG, Ware JE. Validity of student ratings of instruction under different incentive conditions: A further study of the Dr. Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology 1976; 68: 48–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Ware J, Jr. An extended visit with Dr. Fox: Validity of student satisfaction with instruction ratings after repeated exposures to a lecturer. American Educational Research Journal 1977; 14: 449–457
   Google Scholar
• Perry R, Abrami P, Leventhal L. Educational seduction: The effect of instructor expressiveness and lecture content on student ratings and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 1979; 71: 107–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrami PC, Leventhal L, Perry RP. Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research 1982; 52: 446–464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Ware JE. Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multidimensional student rating-scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982; 74: 126–134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charisma. Oxford English Dictionary Online; 1989. http://oed.com.
   Google Scholar
• Weber M. The theory of social and economic organization. Henderson AM, Parsons T, translator. New York: Free Press; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Holladay S, Coombs W. Communicating visions: An exploration of the role of delivery in the creation of leader charisma. Management Communication Quarterly 1993; 6: 405–427
   Google Scholar
• Bass BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectation. The Free Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Norton R. Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Newman RM, McGregor KK. Teachers and laypersons discern quality differences between narratives produced by children with or without SLI. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2006; 49: 1022–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills MT, Watkins RV, Washington J. Language skills of gifted and nongifted African American children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2011: In press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallo MM, Kay T, Ezrachi O. Problems and changes after traumatic brain injury: Differing perceptions within and between families. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 327–335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fordyce DJ, Roueche JR. Changes in perspectives of disability among patients, staff, and relatives during rehabilitation of brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 1986; 31: 217–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Altman IM, O'Brien KP. Behavioral limitations that traumatic-brain-injured patients tend to underestimate. Clinical Neuropsychologist 1990; 4: 163–176
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Disturbances of self-awareness of deficit after traumatic brain injury. Awareness of deficit after traumatic brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues, GP Prigatano, DL Schacter. Oxford University Press, New York 1991; 111–126
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Behavioral limitations TBI patients tend to underestimate: A replication and extension to patients with lateralized cerebral dysfunction. Clinical Neuropsychologist 1996; 10: 191–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Impaired awareness, finger tapping, and rehabilitation outcome after brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 1999; 44: 145–159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Hart T, Nick TG. Measurement of impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of the patient competency rating scale and the awareness questionnaire. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 25–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudel TM, Tryon WW, Purdum CM. Awareness of disability and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 1998; 43: 267–281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery. Grune & Stratton, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Randolph C. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1998
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides C, Campbell WK, Reeder GD, Elliot AJ. The Relationship Closeness Iinduction Task. Representative Research in Social Psychology 1999; 23: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Hunt KW. Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1970; 35: 1–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady N, Rosenthal R. Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin 1992; 111: 256–274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion TB, Katz L, Muldrow R, Dail R. Storytelling and storymaking in an urban preschool classroom: Building bridges from home to school culture. Topics in Language Disorders 1999; 19: 52–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss RM, Chen YS, Chawla P. Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us?. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1996; 28: 389–450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine KJ, Muenchen RA, Brooks AM. Measuring transformational and charismatic leadership: Why isn't charisma measured? Communication Monographs 2010;77:576--591.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 1995
   Google Scholar
• Maricchiolo F, Gnisci A, Bonaiuto M, Ficca G. Effects of different types of hand gestures in persuasive speech on receivers' evaluations. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009; 24: 239–266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Sherer M, Whyte J, Polansky M, Novack TA. Awareness of behavioral, cognitive, and physical deficits in acute traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 1450–1456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Seignourel PJ, Sherer M. A longitudinal study of awareness of deficit after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2009; 19: 161–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2010; 53: 365–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L, Coehlo C, Yorkston K, Kennedy M, Sohlberg MM, Avery J. Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: A systematic review of the evidence. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 769–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grahe JE, Bernieri FJ. Self-awareness of judgment policies of rapport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002; 28: 1407–1418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter L, Uleman JS. When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Social cognition: Key readings, DL Hamilton. Psychology Press, New York, NY 2005; 299–313
   Google Scholar
• Miller N, Maruyama G, Beaber RJ, Valone K. Speed of speech and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976; 34: 615–624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BL, Strong WJ, Rencher AC. Perceptions of personality from speech: Effects of manipulations of acoustical parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1973; 54: 29–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Ryan E. Attitudes toward younger and older adult speakers: Effects of varying speech rates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 1982; 1: 91–109
   Google Scholar
• Apple W, Streeter LA, Krauss RM. Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979; 37: 715–727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picheny MA, Durlach NI, Braida LD. Speaking clearly for the hard-of-hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1986; 29: 434–446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krause JC, Braida LD. Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002; 112: 2165–2172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Liberman M, Cieri C. Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation. Philadelphia, PA: 2006. Paper presented at The Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (INTERSPEECH 2006 ICSLP). Article retrieved from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2006/i06_1795.html.
   Google Scholar