Participation of people with acquired brain injury: Insiders perspectives

References

• Campen C, Iedema J. Are persons with physical disabilities who participate in society healthier and happier? Structural equation modelling of objective participation and subjective well-being. Quality of Life Research 2007; 16: 635–645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whitneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and rehabilitation 2008; 30: 1445–1460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasquin SM, Bouwens SF, Dijcks B, Winkens I, Bakx WG, van Heugten CM. Effectiveness of a low intensity outpatient cognitive rehabilitation programme for patients in the chronic phase after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological rehabilitation 2010; 20: 760–777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trexler LE, Trexler LC, Malec JF, Klyce D, Parrott D. Prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation on community particpation and vocational outcome following brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010; 25: 440–446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva 2002; 10
   Google Scholar
• Fries W, Fischer S. Participation limitations following acquired brain damage: A pilot study on the relationship among functional disorders as well as personal and environmental context factors. Rehabilitation 2008; 47: 265–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Regenmortel T. Empowerment as challenging framework for social inclusion and modern care. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice 2009; 18: 22–24
   Google Scholar
• Wermer MJH, Kool H, Albrecht KW, Rinkel GJE. Subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with clipping: Long-term effects on employment, relationships, personality, and mood. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 91–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2007; 29: 559–566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJP, de Witte L, van den Heuvel W, Wade D. A description of social participation in working age people with aphasia: A review of the literature. Aphasiology 2008; 22: 1071–1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma T, Nierse CJ, Widdershoven GAM. Patients as partners in responsive research: Methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research 2009; 19: 401–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap & Society 1992; 7: 101–114
   Google Scholar
• Abma TA, Broerse J. Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas. Health Expectations 2010; 13: 160–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows LM, Morse JM. Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. The nature of qualitative evidence, JM Morse, JM Swanson, AJ Kuzel. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2001; 187–201
   Google Scholar
• Lieblich AR, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T. Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2008; 337: 687–689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln Y. Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1989
   Google Scholar
• Huberman A, Miles M. Data management and analysis methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: A qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilation Medicine 2008; 40: 89–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkerk MA. The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine Health Care & Philosophy 2001; 4: 289–294
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schipper K, Widdershoven GAM, Abma TA. Citizenship and autonomy in acquired brain injury. Nursing Ethics In press
   Google Scholar
• Yasuda S, Wehman P, Targett P, Cifu D, West M. Return to work for persons with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2001; 80: 852–864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill JH, Zuger RR, Fields A, Fraser R, Pruce T. The program, without walls: Innovative approach to state agency vocational rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical and Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 68–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeseburg B, Abma TA. Care as a mutual endeavour: Experiences of a multiple sclerosis patient and her healthcare professionals. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2006; 9: 349–357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abma TA, Oeseburg B, Widdershoven GA, Goldsteen M, Verkerk MA. Two women with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers: Conflicting normative expectations. Nursing Ethics 2005; 12: 479–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Zee C, Priesterbach A, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers V, Visser-Meily J, Post M. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale and the USER-P. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2010; 42: 752–757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkman M, Schouten L, Huijsman R, Van Splunteren P. Integrated care for patients with a stroke in the Netherlands. Results and experiences from a national Breakthrough Collaborative Improvement project. International Journal on integrated Care 2005; 5: e14
   Google Scholar
• Van Exel J, Koopmanschap MA, van Wijngaarden JDH, Scholte op Reimer WJM. Costs of stroke and stroke services: Determinants of patient costs and a comparison of costs of regular care and care organised in stroke services. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2003;1:2 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-1-2
   Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef HJM, Wagner EH. Fragmentation of chronic care: A call for clarity. International Journal of Integrated Care 2009; 9
   Google Scholar
• Abma TA, Stake RE. Stake's responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution. New Directions for Evaluation 2001; 92: 7–21
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, Kirwan J. Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheumatism 2006; 55: 676–680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper K, Abma TA, van Zadelhoff E, van de Griendt J, Nierse C, Widdershoven GAM. What does it mean to be a patient research partner? An ethnodrama. Qualitative Inquiry 2010; 16: 501–510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean S, Shaw A. From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge- An exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research 2005; 15: 729–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nierse CJ, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E, Van de Griendt J, Abma TA. Collaboration and co-ownership in research. Dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expectations 2011; doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x
   Google Scholar
• Willems V. Reïntegratie na niet aangeboren hersenletsel: Een kwestie van vallen en opstaan. (Re-integration after ABI: It's all about going on). Attent 2010; 3: 5
   Google Scholar