Inter-rater reliability of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX): Comparative data from non-clinician respondents—all raters are not equal

References

• Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witski AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contribution to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 2000; 40: 49–100
   Google Scholar
• Shallice T, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain 1991; 114: 727–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Alexander MP. Is there a dysexecutive syndrome?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2007; 362: 901–915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Shallice T. Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34: 263–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins TW. Shifting and stopping: Frontostriatal substrates, neurochemical modulation and clinical implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2007; 362: 917–932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Levine B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: Lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annual Review of Psychology 2002; 53: 401–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker LA, Andrade J, Romanowski CAJ. Impaired implicit cognition with intact executive function after extensive bilateral prefrontal pathology: A case study. Neurocase 2004; 10: 233–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker LA, Andrade J, Morton N, Romanowski CAJ, Bowles D. Investigating the ‘latent’ deficit hypothesis: Age at time of head injury, implicit and executive functions and behavioral insight. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48: 2550–2563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslinger PJ, Flaherty-Craig CV, Benton AL. Developmental outcomes after early prefrontal cortex damage. Brain and Cognition 2004; 55: 84–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentridge RW, Heywood CA. Metacognition and awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 2000; 9: 308–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Forbes C, Costello A, Coates LMA, Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Gilbert SJ, Dumontheil I, Channon S. The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 194–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Thames Valley Test Company, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Evans J, Emslie H, Wilson BA. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1998; 4: 547–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker LA, Andrade J, Romanowski CAJ, Morton N, Wasti A. Implicit cognition is impaired and dissociable in a head-injured group with executive deficits. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 1413–1424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton N, Barker LA. Top down or bottom up? Executive and implicit function contributions to awareness after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2010; 24: 38
   Google Scholar
• Morton N, Barker L A. The contribution of executive and implicit processes to awareness of deficits post head injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2010; 16: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBrinn JM, Wilson CF, Caldwell S, Carton S, Delargy M, McCann J, Walsh J, McGuire BE. Emotional distress and awareness following acquired brain injury: An exploratory analysis. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 765–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenburg S, Dopslaff N. The dysexecutive questionnaire advanced: Item and test score characteristics, 4-factor solution, and severity classification. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2008; 196: 75–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood 1st RL, Liossi C. The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 429–437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgess PW, Shallice T. The Hayling and Brixton Tests. Thames Valley Test Company Ltd, Bury St EdmundsEngland 1997
   Google Scholar
• Evans JJ, Chua SE, McKenna PJ, Wilson BA. Assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 1997; 27: 635–646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes N, Bajo A. The relationship between general intelligence, performance on executive functioning tests and everyday executive function difficulties. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 174
   Google Scholar
• Norris G, Tate RL. The behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome (BADS): Ecological, concurrent and construct validity. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2000; 10: 33–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood 1st RL, Rutterford NA. Relationships between measured cognitive ability and reported psychosocial activity after bilateral frontal lobe injury: An 18-year follow-up. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 329–350
   Google Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Fractionation of the dysexecutive syndrome in a heterogeneous neurological sample: Comparing the dysexecutive questionnaire and the Brock adaptive functioning questionnaire. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 615–621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dywan J, Segalowitz S. Self and family ratings of adaptive behaviour after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric scores and frontally generated ERP's. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1996; 11: 79–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan RCK, Bode RK. Analysis of patient and proxy ratings on the dysexecutive questionnaire: An application of Rasch analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2008; 79: 86–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett PC, Ong B, Ponsford J. Assessment of executive function following traumatic brain injury: Comparison of the BADS with other clinical neuropsychological measures. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005; 11: 376–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy P, Grace J. A review of rating scales for measuring behavior change due to frontal systems damage. Cognitive Behavioral Neurology 2005; 18: 18–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan RCK, Manly T. The application of ‘dysexecutive syndrome’ measures across cultures. Performance and checklist assessment in neurologically healthy and traumatically brain-injured Hong Kong Chinese volunteers. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2002; 8: 778–780
   Google Scholar
• Channon S, Crawford S. Problem-solving in real-life type situations: The effect of anterior and posterior lesions on performance. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 757–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight C, Alderman N, Burgess PW. Development of a simplified version of the multiple errands test for use in hospital settings. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2002; 12: 231–255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccio CA, Hall J, Morgan A, Hynd GW. Executive function and the Wisconsin card sorting test: Relationship with behavioural ratings and cognitive ability. Developmental Neuropsychology 1994; 10: 215–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnik BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins, , CA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Meyer GJ, Mihurra JL, Smith BL. The interclinician reliability of Rorschach interpretation in four data sets. Journal of Personality Assessment 2005; 84: 296–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laalo JP, Kurki TJ, Sonninen PH, Tenovuo OS. Reliability of diagnosis of traumatic brain injury by computed tomography in the acute phase. Journal of Neurotrauma 2009; 26: 2169–2178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney B, Walmsley C, McFarland K. Factor analysis of the self-report (DEX-S) questionnaire. Applied Neuropsychology 2006; 13: 12–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar