Changes in the brain activation balance in motor-related areas after constraint-induced movement therapy; a longitudinal fMRI study

References

• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Novack TA, Cook EW, 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 347–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Devillé WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369–2375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Archives of Phyical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 14–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke 2000; 31: 2984–2988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, Bushara KO, Eckloff S, Croarkin E, Taub E, Gerber LH, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: Magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2003; 17: 48–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploughman M, Corbett D. Can forced-use therapy be clinically applied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 1417–1423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RS. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography. Annals of Neurology 1991; 29: 63–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, D'Olhaberriague L, Vikingstad EM, Levine SR, Welch KM. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke 1998; 29: 112–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000; 31: 656–661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre JY, Baron JC. Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: A longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke 2001; 32: 2534–2542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, Bussel B, Cazalis F, Pierot L, Burnod Y, Maier MA. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: Recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33: 1610–1617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: A cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126: 1430–1448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: A longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126: 2476–2496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombari D, Loubinoux I, Pariente J, Gerdelat A, Albucher JF, Tardy J, Cassol E, Chollet F. A longitudinal fMRI study: In recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 827–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaillard A, Martin CD, Garambois K, Lebas JF, Hommel M. Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. Brain 2005; 128: 1122–1138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey LM, Abbott DF, Egan GF, O'Keefe GJ, Jackson GD, Bernhardt J, Donnan GA. Evolution of brain activation with good and poor motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2006; 20: 24–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calautti C, Naccarato M, Jones PS, Naccarato M, Sharma N, Day DJ, Bullmore ET, Warburton EA, Baron JC. The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: A 3T fMRI study. Neuroimage 2007; 34: 322–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang SH, Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim YH, Kwon YH, Byun WM, Lee SJ, Park SM, Chang CH. Cortical reorganization associated with motor recovery in hemiparetic stroke patients. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 1305–1310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Longitudinal changes in cerebral response to proprioceptive input in individual patients after stroke: An FMRI study. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2006; 20: 398–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim T, Indredavik B, Vangberg T, Håberg A. Motor network changes associated with successful motor skill relearning after acute ischemic stroke: A longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2009; 23: 295–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small SL, Hlustik P, Noll DC, Genovese C, Solodkin A. Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke. Brain 2002; 125: 1544–1557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii Y, Nakada T. Cortical reorganization in patients with subcortical hemiparesis: Neural mechanisms of functional recovery and prognostic implication. Journal of Neurosurgery 2003; 98: 64–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loubinoux I, Carel C, Pariente J, Dechaumont S, Albucher JF, Marque P, Manelfe C, Chollet F. Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 2166–2180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001; 80: 4–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS, Dijkhuizen RM, Benner T, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR, Cramer SC. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: A preliminary study. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2002; 16: 326–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen-Berg H, Dawes H, Guy C, Smith SM, Wade DT, Matthews PM. Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain 2002; 125: 2731–2742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Park JW, Ko MH, Jang SH, Lee PK. Plastic changes of motor network after constraint-induced movement therapy. Yonsei Medical Journal 2004; 45: 241–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szaflarski JP, Page SJ, Kissela BM, Lee JH, Levine P, Strakowski SM. Cortical reorganization following modified constraint-induced movement therapy: A study of 4 patients with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006; 87: 1052–1058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D. EXCITE Investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 2006; 296: 2095–2104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1975; 7: 13–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, Taub E, Giuliani C, Pearson SL. The EXCITE trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2005; 19: 194–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001; 82: 750–755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaechter JD. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Progress in Neurobiology 2004; 73: 61–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bütefisch CM, Kleiser R, Seitz RJ. Post-lesional cerebral reorganisation: Evidence from functional neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2006; 22: 437–454
   Google Scholar
• Rossini PM, Altamura C, Ferreri F, Melgari JM, Tecchio F, Tombini M, Pasqualetti P, Vernieri F. Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery from stroke. Eura Medicophys 2007; 43: 241–254
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1233–1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke M, Lidzba K. LI-tool: A new toolbox to assess lateralization in functional MR-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2007; 163: 128–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: Efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005; 86: 1867–1873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Thompson PA, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Blanton S, Nichols-Larsen D, Clark PC. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: The EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurology 2008; 7: 33–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SM, Bandettini PA, Binder JR, Bobholz JA, Hammeke TA, Stein EA, Hyde JS. Relationship between finger movement rate and functional magnetic resonance signal change in human primary motor cortex. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow Metabolism 1996; 16: 1250–1254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC, Finklestein SP, Schaechter JD, Bush G, Rosen BR. Activation of distinct motor cortex regions during ipsilateral and contralateral finger movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 1999; 81: 383–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechaumont-Palacin S, Marque P, De Boissezon X, Castel-Lacanal E, Carel C, Berry I, Pastor J, Albucher JF, Chollet F, Loubinoux I. Neural correlates of proprioceptive integration in the contralesional hemisphere of very impaired patients shortly after a subcortical stroke: An fMRI study. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2008; 22: 288–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong Y, Dobkin BH, Cen SY, Wu AD, Winstein CJ. Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 1552–1555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, Kischka U, Wimalaratna S, Matthews PM. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 2002; 99: 14518–14523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, Ugurbil K. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain 2002; 125: 773–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Mastaglia FL. Dual representation of the hand in the cerebellum: Activation with voluntary and passive finger movement. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 670–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibasaki H, Sadato N, Lyshkow H, Yonekura Y, Honda M, Nagamine T, Suwazono S, Magata Y, Ikeda A, Miyazaki M, Fukuyama H, Asato R, Konishi J. Both primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area play an important role in complex finger movement. Brain 1993; 116: 1387–1398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyon J, Penhune V, Ungerleider LG. Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 252–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton FA, Strick PL. The cerebellum: An overview. Trends in Neuroscience 1998; 21: 367–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnani N, Toni I, Josephs O, Ashburner J, Passingham RE. Learning- and expectation-related changes in the human brain during motor learning. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000; 84: 3026–3035
   PubMedGoogle Scholar