Assessment of executive functioning in brain injury: Collaboration between speech-language pathology and neuropsychology for an integrative neuropsychological perspective

References

• Constantinidou F, Thomas R. Principles of cognitive rehabilitation in TBI: an integrative neuroscience approach. Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation, treatment, and case management3rd, M Ashley. Taylor & Francis: CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 2010; 549–582
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, Langenbahn DM, Felicetti T, Kneipp S, Ellmo W, Kalmar K, Giacino JT, Harley JP, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005; 86: 1681–1692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Nakase-Thomson R, Constantinidou F, Wertheimer JC, Paul DR. Memory assessment on an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team: A theoretically based framework. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2007; 16: 316–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EM, Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests3rd. University Press, Oxford 2006
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Cyr JA, Bronstein YL, Cummings JL. Neurobehavioral consequences of neurosurgical treatments and focal lesions of frontal-subcortical circuits. Principles of frontal lobe function, DT Stuss, RT Knight. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York 2002
   Google Scholar
• Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 1994; 50: 7–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Binns MA, Murphy KJ, Alexander MP. Dissociations within the anterior attentional system: Effects of task complexity and irrelevant information on reaction time speed and accuracy. Neuropsychology 2002; 16: 500–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment3rd. Oxford University Press, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. Guilford Press, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Callahan CC. The Assessment and rehabilitation of executive function disorders. Rehabilitation of neuropsychological disorders, B Johnstone, HH Stonnington. Edwards Brothers, Lillington, NC 2001; 87–124
   Google Scholar
• Struss DT, Beeson DF. The frontal lobes. Raven Press, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Busch RM, McBride A, Curtiss G, Vanderploeg RD. The components of executive functioning in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005; 27: 1022–1032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate AJ, Mathias JL, Crawford JR. Performance on the test of everyday attention and standard tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2001; 15: 405–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The structure of normal human attention: The test of everyday attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1996; 2: 525–534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serino A, Ciaramelli E, Di Santantonio A, Malagu S, Servadei F, Ladavas E. Central executive deficits after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 23–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Guise E, Feyz M, LeBlanc J, Richard S, Lamoureux J. Overview of traumatic brain injury patients at a tertiary trauma centre. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 2005; 32: 186–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francham KA, Fox AM, Maybery MT. Neuropsychological studies of mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review of research since 1995. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005; 27: 334–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry JD, Crawford JRA. Meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropyshcology 2004; 18: 621–628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milleville-Pennel I, Pothier J, Hoc JM, Mathé JF. Consequences of cognitive impairments following traumatic brain injury: Pilot study on visual exploration while driving. Brain Injury 2010; 24: 678–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz L, Penna S, Novack T. Factors contributing to performance on the Rey Complex Figure Test in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychology 2009; 23: 255–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson V, Catroppa C. Recovery of executive skills following paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI): A 2 year follow-up. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 459–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvie H. Problem-solving deficits following wounds on the brain. Journal of Mental Science 1960; 106: 1377–1382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yochim B, Baldo J, Nelson A, Delis D. D-KEFS Trail Making Test performance in patients with lateral prefrontal cortex lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007; 13: 704–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis S, Rosenthal M, Novack T, Sherer M, Nick T, Kreutzer J, High W, Ricker J. Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001; 16: 343–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilkman JM, Van der Naalt J. Indices of impaired self-awareness in traumatic brain injury patients with focal frontal lesions and executive deficits: Implications for outcome measurement. Journal of Neurotrama 2010; 27: 1195–1202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floden D, Alexander M, Kubu C, Katz D, Stuss D. Impulsivity and risk-taking behaviour in focal frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 213–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport M, McCullagh S, Shammi P, Feinstein A. Cognitive impairment associated with major depression following mild and moderate traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry Clininical Neuroscience 2005; 17: 61–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Kelsey S, Escobar M, Vernich L. Long-term outcomes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen SS, Machamer JE, Powell JM, Temkin NR. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 1449–1457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagulayan KF, Temkin NR, Machamer J, Dikmen SS. A longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006; 87: 611–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Bergloff P, Levin E, High WM, Oden KE, Nick TG. Impaired awareness and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1998; 13: 52–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin LA, Barr WB, Burton LA. Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2005; 20: 33–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton RK. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL 1981
   Google Scholar
• Meyers J, Meyers K. The Meyers Scoring System for the Rey Complex Figure and the Recognition Trial: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL 1995
   Google Scholar
• Osterrieth PA. Le test de copie d’une figure complex: Contribution a l’étude de la perception et de la mémoire. Archives de Psychologie 1944; 30: 286–356
   Google Scholar
• Rey A. L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’encephalopathic traumatique. Archives de Psychologie 1941; 28: 286–340
   Google Scholar
• DeFilippis NA, McCampbell E. Manual for the Booklet Category Test. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL 1997
   Google Scholar
• Reitan RM. Trail Making Test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1955; 19: 393–394
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benton AL, Hamsher KDeS. Multilingual aphasia examination. AJA Associates, Iowa City, Iowa 1989
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised manual. Psychological Corporation, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – 3rd ed manual. Psychological Corporation, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence manual. Psychological Corporation, New York 1999
   Google Scholar
• Jensen AR, Rohwer WD. The Stroop Colour-Word test: A review. Acta Psychologica 1966; 25: 36–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935; 18: 643–662
   Google Scholar
• Porteus SD. The Maze Test and clinical psychology. Pacific Books, Palo Alto, CA 1959
   Google Scholar
• Porteus SD. Porteus Maze Test. Fifty years’ application. Psychological Corporation, New York 1965
   Google Scholar
• Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior Rating Inventory of executive function (Children and Adult versions). Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc, Odessa, FL 2000
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural assessment of dysexecutive syndrome. Thames Valley Test, Bury St. EdmundsUK 1996
   Google Scholar
• Sherer M, The Awareness Questionnaire. The Centre for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury; 2004. Available online at: http://www.tbims.org/combi/aq, accessed 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Dywan J, Segalowitz SJ. Self- and family ratings of adaptive behaviour after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric scores and frontally generated ERPs. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1996; 11: 79–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin LA, Burton LA, Barr WB. Utilization rates of ecologically oriented instruments among clinical neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2007; 21: 727–743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbordone RJ. Ecological validity: Some critical issues for the neuropsychologist. Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, RJ Sbordone, SJ Long. GR Press/St. Luci Press, Delray Beach, FL 1996
   Google Scholar
• Marcotte TD, Grant I, Neuropsychology of everyday functioning. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Boyd TM, Sautter SW. Route-Finding: A measure of everyday executive functioning in the head-injured adult. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1993; 7: 171–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddley A. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Thames Valley Test, Bury St. EdmundsUK 1985
   Google Scholar
• Paul-Brown D, Ricker J, Evaluating and treating communication and cognitive disorders: Approaches to referral and collaboration for speech-language pathology and clinical neuropsychology [Technical Report]. 2003. Available online at: http//www.asha.org/policy, accessed 30 July 2011
   Google Scholar
• Benton AL, Hamsher KdeS, Sivan AB. Multilingual aphasia examination3rd. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1994
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald S, Melnichouk O. Functional assessment of verbal reasoning and executive strategies: Standardization chapter. CCD Publishing, Guelph, ON 2005
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M, Howieson D, Loring D. Neuropsychological assessment4th. Oxford University Press, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Ylvisaker M, Turkstra LS. Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language 2005; 26: 223–241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeBlanc JM, Hayden ME, Paulman RG. A comparison of neuropsychological and situational assessment for predicting employability after closed head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 1022–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander A, Raymer A, Wertheimer J, Paul D, Brown S. Perceived roles of neuropsychologists and speech-language pathologists in rehabilitation. Clinical Neuropsychologist 2006; 20: 583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra LS, Coelho C, Ylvisaker M. The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language 2005; 26: 215–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Body R, Perkin M, McDonald S. Pragmatics, cognition, and communication in TBI. Communication disorders following TBI, S McDonald, L Togher, C Code. Psychology Press, HoveUK 1999; 81–112
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Coelho C, Turkstra L, Ylvisaker M, Sohlberg MM, Yorkston K, et al. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 257–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Interprofessional Relations between the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) and Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association (APA). Structure and function of an interdisciplinary team for persons with acquired brain injury [Guidelines]. 2007. Available online at: http//www.asha.org/policy, accessed 4 March 2008
   Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Emerson MJ, Friedman NP. Assessment of executive functions in clinical settings: Problems and recommendations. Seminars in Speech and Language 2000; 21: 19–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination3rd. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 2000
   Google Scholar
• Matthews CG, Klove H. Instruction Manual for the Adult Neuropsychological Test Battery. University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI 1964
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale-III. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1997b
   Google Scholar
• Delis D, Kramer J, Kaplan E, Ober B. California Verbal Learning Test2nd. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 2000
   Google Scholar
• Connors D, Staff M. Connors Continuous Performance Test II (CPT II). MultiHealth Systems, Inc., North Tonawada, NY 2000
   Google Scholar
• Smith A. Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Manual (revised). Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Delis D, Kaplan E, Karmer J. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System1st. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Individual Achievement Test manual. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1992
   Google Scholar