Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury

References

• Campbell J, Trapnell P, Heine S, Katz I, Lavallee L, Lehman D. Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996; 70: 141–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morf C. Editorial: Affirming the self as construct and journal. Self Identity 2005; 4: 97–100
   Google Scholar
• Stein K, Markus H. The role of the self in behavioral change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 1996; 6: 349–384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitbourne S, Sneed J, Skultety K. Identity processes in adulthood: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Identity 2002; 2: 29–45
   Google Scholar
• Klein S. The self: As a construct in psychology and neuropsychological evidence for its multiplicity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2010; 1: 172–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor J, Ashman T, Schwartz M, Gordon W, Hibbard M, Brown M, Spielman L, Charatz H, Cheng Z. the role of self-discrepancy theory in understanding post-traumatic brain injury affective disorders: A pilot study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 527–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain D. The experience of surviving traumatic brain injury. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006; 54: 407–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracey F, Palmer S, Rous B, Psaila K, Shaw K, O'Dell J, Cope J, Mohamed S. ‘Feeling part of things’: Personal construction of self after brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 627–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumisko E, Lexell J, Soderberg A. The meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 2005; 37: 42–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levack W, Kayes M, Fadyl J. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disability and Rehabilitation 2010; 32: 986–999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muenchberger H, Kendall E, Neal R. Identity transition following traumatic brain injury: A dynamic process of contraction, expansion and tentative balance. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 979–992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Dealing with the ‘void’: Traumatic brain injury as a story. Disability and Society 1997; 12: 533–555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. ‘Loss of self’ in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: A qualitative analysis. Social Science and Medicine 1998; 46: 869–878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyerman A, Humphrey M. Changes in self-concept following severe head injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1984; 7: 11–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery C, Gontovsky S, Caroselli J. Self-concept and quality of life following acquired brain injury: A pilot investigation. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 657–655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Telford R. Psychological problems following minor head injury: A prospective study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1996; 35: 399–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reflections on Dobermanns, poodles and social rehabilitation for difficult-to-serve individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 407–431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reconstruction of identity after brain injury. Brain Impairment 2000; 1: 12–28
   Google Scholar
• Klinger L. Occupational adaptation: Perspectives of people with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Occupational Science 2005; 12: 9–16
   Google Scholar
• Sabat A, Moodley L, Kathard H. Identity construction following traumatic brain injury: A case study. South African Journal of Communication Disorders 2006; 53: 17–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nochi M. Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Social Science and Medicine 2000; 51: 1795–1804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine 1990; 30: 1161–1172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, London 2006
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. Developing grounded theory: The second generation, JM Morse, P Noerager Stern, J Corbin, B Bowers, K Charmaz, A Clarke. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA 2009; 127–193
   Google Scholar
• Bluff R. Grounded theory: The methodology. Qualitative research in health care, I Holloway. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire 2005; 147–167
   Google Scholar
• Browne J. Grounded theory analysis: Coming to data with questioning minds. Research methods for nursing and health science2^nd, V Minichiello, G Sullivan, K Greenwood, R Axford. Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW 2004; 624–673
   Google Scholar
• Morse J, Richards L. Read me first for a user's guide to qualitative methods. Sage Publications, Inc, California 2002
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups2^nd. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraAustralia 2011
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 573–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadorn D, Sorenson J, Holte J. Large-scale health outcomes evaluation: How should quality of life be measured?. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995; 48: 619–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagiella E, Novack T, Ansel B, Diaz-Arrastia R, Dikman S, Hart T, Temkin N. Measuring outcome in traumatic brain injury treatment trials: Recommendations from the traumatic brain injury clinical trials network. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010; 25: 375–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Dyson M, Foreman P. Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: Does it make a difference?. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 107–118
   Google Scholar
• Steadman-Pare D, Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Vernich L. Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001; 16: 330–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson E, Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S, Ehnfors M, Ehrenberg A. Methodological issues in interviews involving people with communication impairments after acquired brain injury. Qualitative Health Research 2007; 17: 1361–1371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd V, Gatherer A, Kalsy S. Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qualitative Health Research 2006; 16: 1386–1404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qualitative Health Research 2002; 12: 399–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichiello V, Madison J, Hays T, Parmenter G. Doing qualitative in-depth interviews. Research methods for nursing and health science2^nd, V Minichiello, G Sullivan, K Greenwood, R Axford. Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW 2004; 411–446
   Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Youse K, Le K. Conversational discourse in closed head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 659–672
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2010; 53: 365–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bracy C, Snow P. Measuring perceived communicative ability after traumatic brain injury: Reliability and validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007; 22: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bracy C, Snow P. Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: Insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 1181–1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language 1993; 44: 28–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Narrative discourse following severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 529–551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Brain Injury 1998; 11: 911–935
   Google Scholar
• Togher L. Giving information: The importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 365–390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ltd. QSR International Pty, NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 7. QSR International Pty Ltd; 2006
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. WHO, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Suls J, Martin R, Wheeler L. Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002; 11: 159–163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls J, Wheeler L. Handbook of social comparison. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano G. Disturbances of self-awareness and rehabilitation of patients with brain injury: A 20 year perspective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 19–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Clare L. The association between awareness deficits and rehabilitation outcome following acquired brain injury. Clinical Psychology Review 2006; 26: 783–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Spellacy F. Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 71–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellet M, Morin C, Lavoie A. Volunteer work and psychological health following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2009; 24: 262–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl M, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P, Shue K, Davies D. The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 15–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Spellacy F. Indicators of long-term family functioning following severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 819–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan J, Bogner J, Mysiw W, Clinchot D, Fugate L. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001; 16: 543–555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce C, Hanks R. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the World Health Organization model of disability. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006; 85: 89–898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner W, Pickett C, Knowles M. “Social snacking” and “social shielding”: The use of symbolic social bonds to maintain belonging needs. The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection and bullying, K Williams, J Forgas, W von Hippel. Psychology Press, New York 2005; 227–242
   Google Scholar
• Shaddon B, Hagstrom F, Koski P. Life stories and the narrative self. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA 2008
   Google Scholar
• McAdams D, Josselson R, Lieblich A. Identity and story: Creating self in narrative. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 2006
   Google Scholar