Video-based administration of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire for adults with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners

References

• Coelho C, Youse KM, Le KN. Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 659–672
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey HPD, Shum D. Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 433–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh NV, Kersel DA, Havill JH, Sleigh JW. Caregiver burden at 1 year following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 1045–1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh NV, Kersel DA, Havill JH, Sleigh JW. Caregiver burden at 6 months following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 225–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersel DA, Marsh NV, Havill JH, Sleigh JW. Psychological functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 683–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: A relative's view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1986; 49: 764–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston MG, Brooks DN, Bond MR. Three months after severe head injury: Psychiatric and social impact on relatives. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 870–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace CA, Bogner J. Awareness of deficits: Emotional implications for persons with brain injury and their significant others. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 549–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Miner DK, Kreutzer JS. Long-term life quality and family needs after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001; 17: 374–385
   Google Scholar
• Ergh TC, Rapport LJ, Coleman RD, Hanks RA. Predictors of caregiver and family functioning following traumatic brain injury: Social support moderates cargiver distress. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 155–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language 1993; 44: 28–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 769–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [Final Draft]. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001, Available online at: http://www.who.int/icidh, accessed 1 September 2008
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Communication and behavior: Collaboration between speech-language pathologists and behavioral psychologists. Topics in Language Disorders 1994; 15: 37–54
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Collaborative brain injury intervention: Positive everyday routines. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Jacobs HE, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience behavioral and cognitive disability after brain injury: A review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 7–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner S, Whitworth A. Clinicians’ perceptions of candidacy for conversation partner training in aphasia: How do we select candidates for therapy and do we get it right?. Aphasiology 2006; 20: 616–643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahan E, Pepin M, Hopps S. Impaired awareness of deficits and treatment adherence among people with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 226–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prutting C, Kirchner D. A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1987; 52: 105–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linscott RJ, Knight RG, Godfrey HPD. The Profile of Functional Impairment in Communication (PFIC): A measure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 397–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, O'Flaherty C, Snow P. Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 251–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bracy CA, Snow P. Measuring perception of communicative ability: Reliability and validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007; 22: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bracy CA, Snow P. Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: Insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 1181–1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Using the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire to measure perceived social communication ability in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2010; 11: 171–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Relation of executive function to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2010; 53: 365–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, Fitzgerald P, Parkes KR. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1982; 21: 1–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Hart T, Nick TG. Measurement of impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of the patient competency rating scale and the awareness questionnaire. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 25–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Bergloff P, Boake C, High W, Levin E. The awareness questionnaire: Factor analysis structure and internal consistency. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 63–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmond M, Fleming JM. Reliability of the self-awareness of deficits interview for adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 325–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkins BM, Worrall LE, Hickson LM. Stakeholder opinion of functional communication activities following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 691–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford WK, Keefer E, Osgarby SM. “How has the week been for you two?” Relationship satisfaction and hindsight memory biases in couples' reports of relationship events. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2002; 26: 759–773
   Google Scholar
• Matt GE, Vazquez C, Campbell WK. Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review 1992; 12: 227–255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske ST. Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme information. Journal of Personality and School Psychology 1980; 39: 889–906
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald MC, Christiansen MH. Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 2002; 109: 35–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen MA, Pappadis MR, Mazzei DK, Clark AN, Davis LC, Sander AM. Perceptions of communication abilities for persons with traumatic brain injury: Validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 940–951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Lindhart S, Brady B, Metamemory for narratives after traumatic brain injury: Does timing matter? 2006. Unpublished Manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Prater MA, Carter N, Hitchcock C, Dowrick P. Video self-modeling to improve academic performance: A literature review. Psychology in the Schools 2012; 49: 71–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz J, Burlingame C, Onuegbulem C, Yoshikawa K, Rojas ED. The use of video self-modeling with English Language Learners: Implications for success. Psychology in the Schools 2012; 49: 23–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buggey T, Ogle L. Video self-modeling. Psychology in the Schools 2012; 49: 52–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cream A, O'Brian S, Jones M, Block S, Harrison E, Lincoln M, Hewat S, Packman A, Menzies R, Onslow M. Randomized controlled trial of video self-modeling following speech restructuring treatment for stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2010; 53: 887–897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw-Hunter M, Faw GD, Davis PK. The use of video self-modeling and feedback to teach cooking skills to individuals with traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1061–1068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Yorkston KM. Accuracy of metamemory after traumatic brain injury: Predictions during verbal learning. Journal of speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2000; 43: 1072–1086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT. Self-monitoring recall during two tasks after traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2004; 13: 142–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Carney E, Peters SM. Predictions of recall and study strategy decisions after diffuse brain injury. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 1043–1064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY 1997
   Google Scholar