False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests

References

• Slick DJ, Sherman EMS, Iverson GL. Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1999;13:545–561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Morgan JE, Larrabee GJ, Millis SR, Conference Participants. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2009;23:1093–1129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone KB. The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examinations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2009;23:729–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet JJ. Appendix: Forensic bibliography: Effort/malingering and other common topics encountered by clinical neuropsychologists. In: Morgan JE, Sweet JJ, editors. Neuropsychology of malingering casebook. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; 2009. pp 568–608
   Google Scholar
• Sollman MJ, Berry DTR. Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic update and extension. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2011;26:774–789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasinski LJ, Berrry DTR, Shandera AL, Clark JA. Using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Span subtest for malingering detection: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011;33:300–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder RW, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Baade LE, Marshall PS. Reliable Digit Span: A systematic review and cross-validation study. Assessment 2012;19:21–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingraham LJ, Aiken CB. An empirical approach to determining criteria for abnormality in test batteries with multiple measures. Neuropsychology 1996;10:120–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: Relationship to likelihood ratios. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2008;22:666–679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson GA. Statistical analysis in psychology & education. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1971. pp 81–84
   Google Scholar
• Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Gault CB. Estimating the percentage of the population with abnormally low scores (or abnormally large score differences) on standardized neuropsychological test batteries: A generic method with applications. Neuropsychology 2007;21:419–430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metropolis N. The beginning of the Monte Carlo method. Los Alamos Science 1987;Special Issue:125–130
   Google Scholar
• Schretlen DJ, Testa SM, Winicki JM, Pearlson GD, Gordon B. Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008;14:436–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks BL, Iverson GL. Comparing actual to estimated base rates of “abnormal” scores on neuropsychological test batteries: Implications for interpretation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2010;25:14–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker SL, Schneider WJ, Hale JB. Estimating base rates of impairment in neuropsychological test batteries: A comparison of quantitative models. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2012;27:69–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaskewitz N, Merten T, Kathmann N. Performance of children on symptom validity tests: TOMM, MSVT, and FIT. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2008;23:379–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstra A, Spaan PEJ, Schmand B. Validation of symptom validity tests using a ‘child-model’ of adult cognitive impairments. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2010;25:371–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perna R, Loughan AR, Hertza J, Segraves K. The value of embedded measures in detecting suboptimal effort in children: An investigation into the WISC-IV Digit Span and CMS Verbal Memory subtests. Applied Neuropsychology: Child 2013; in press
   Google Scholar
• Strutt AM, Scott BM, Shrestha S, York MK. The Rey 15-Item Memory Test and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2011;25:1253–1265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld B, Green D, Pivovarova E, Dole T, Zapf P. What to do with contradictory data? Approaches to the integration of multiple malingering measures. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2010;9:63–73
   Google Scholar
• Henry M, Merten T, Wolf SA, Harth S. Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test performance of elderly healthy adults and clinical neurology patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010;32:19–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson NW, Hoelzle JB, McGuire KA, Ferrier-Auerbach AG, Charlesworth, MJ, Sponheim SR. Evaluation context impacts neuropsychological performance of OEF/OIF veterans with reported combat-related concussion. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2010;25:713–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten T, Bossink L, Schmand B. On the limits of effort testing: Symptom validity tests and severity of neurocognitive symptoms in nonlitigant patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2007;29:308–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlinchey R, Milberg W. Reduced effort predicts clinical characteristics and cognitive test performance of OEF/OIF veterans in a research setting. Manuscript submitted for editorial review
   Google Scholar
• Miller JB, Millis SR, Rapport LJ, Bashem JR, Hanks RA, Axelrod BN. Detection of insufficient effort using the Advanced Clinical Solutions from the Wechsler Memory Scale. Eth edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2011;25:160–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdnack JA, Drozdick LW. Advanced Clinical Solutions Clinical and Interpretive Manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments; 2009. Standardization data from the Advanced Clinical Solutions for WAIS-IV and WMS-IV. Copyright © 2009 NCS Pearson, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved
   Google Scholar
• Pella RD, Hill BD, Shelton JT, Elliot E. Evaluation of embedded malingering indices in a non-litigating clinical sample using control, clinical, and derived groups. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2012;27:45–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loring DW, Lee GP, Meador KJ. Victoria Symptom Validity Test performance in non-litigating epilepsy surgery candidates. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005;27:610–617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh AJ, Bender A, Whitman LA, Vasserman M, MacAllister WS. Clinical utility of Reliable Digit Span in assessing effort in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2012;27:735–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macciocchi SN, Seel RT, Alderson A, Godsall R. Victoria Symptom Validity Test performance in acute severe traumatic brain injury: Implications for test interpretation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006;21:395–404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle P, Gervais, RO, Green P. Memory Complaints Inventory and symptom validity test performance in a clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2012;27:725–734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone KB, Salazar X, Lu P, Warner-Chacon K, Razani J. The Rey 15-Item recognition trial: A technique to enhance sensitivity of the Rey 15-Item Memorization Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2002;24:561–573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babikian T, Boone KB, Lu P, Arnold G. Sensitivity and specificity of various digit span scores in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2006;20:145–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardolf BR, Denney RL, Houston CM. Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2007;21:899–916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznek L. The Rey 15-item memory test for malingering: A meta-analysis. Brain Injury 2005;19:539–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Roberson T. The Booklet Category Test and malingering in traumatic brain injury: Classification accuracy in known groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2007;21:318–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson GL, Tulsky DS. Detecting malingering on the WAIS-III unusual digit span performance patterns in the normal population and in clinical groups. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2003;18:1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, Theroux S, Aguila-Puentes G, Bianchini K, Greve K, Rayls K. Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2001;15:440–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Mathias CW, Houston RJ, Crouch JA. Detecting malingered performance on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Validation of Mittenberg’s approach in traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2003;18:245–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Binder LM, Bianchini KJ. Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2009;23:534–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock EM, Condit DC. Base rates of symptom exaggeration and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2002;24:1094-1102
   Google Scholar
• Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment 2000;12:19–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ægisdóttir S, White MJ, Spengler PM, Maugherman AS, Anderson LA, Cook RS, Cassandra N, Nichols CN, Lampropoulos GK, Walker BS, et al. The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist 2006;34:341–382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar