Text-to-speech technology effects on reading rate and comprehension by adults with traumatic brain injury

References

• Lovett MW, Barron RW, Forbes JE, Cuksts B, Steinbach KA. Computer speech-based training of literacy skills in neurologically impaired children: A controlled evaluation. Brain and Language 1994;47:117–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman SB, Gamino JF, Cook LG, Hanten G, Li X, Levin HS. Impaired discourse gist and working memory in children after brain injury. Brain and Language 2006;97:178–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook LG, DePompei R, Chapman SB. Cognitive communicative challenges in TBI: Assessment and intervention in the long term. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders 2011;21:33–42
   Google Scholar
• Gamino JF, Chapman SB, Cook LG. Strategic learning in youth with traumatic brain injury. Topics in Language Disorders 2009;29:224–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker L, Burns L, Elkind J, Elkind K, Katz L. Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. Annals of Dyslexia 2002;52:243–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Berquist TF, Felicetti, T, Giacino, JT, Harley JP, Harrington DE, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000;81:1596–1615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montali J, Lewandowski I. Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1996;29:271–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson AG, Petersen M. Efficacy of ‘talking books’ for a group of reading disabled boys. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1983;57:567–570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitsma P. Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly 1988;23:219–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale AD, Skinner CH, Winn BD, Oliver R, Allin JD, Molloy CM. An investigation of listening and listening-while-reading accommodations on reading comprehension levels and rates in students with emotional disorders. Psychology in the Schools 2005;42:39–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson R, Foltz G, Wise B. Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 1986;18:93–99
   Google Scholar
• Dawson L, Venn ML, Gunter PL. The effects of teacher versus computer reading models. Behavioral Disorders 2000;25:105–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkind J, Black MS, Murray C. Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia 1996;46:159–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman A, Boon RR, Keller-Bell Y, Stagliano C, Jeffs T. Effects of text-to-speech software on the reading rate and comprehension skills of high school students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2010;16:41–49
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt AJ, McCallum E, Hale AD, Obeldobel E, Dingus K. Can text-to-speech assistive technology improve the reading comprehension of students with severe reading and emotional disabilities? Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 2009;10:95–119
   Google Scholar
• Goddard Y, Rinderknecht L. Using basic reading skills instruction and formative assessments to teach an adult with traumatic brain injury to read. Remedial and Special Education 2009;30:283–299
   Google Scholar
• Asikainen I, Kaste M, Sarna S. Predicting late outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury referred to a rehabilitation programme: A study of 508 Finnish patients 5 years of more after injury. Brain Injury 1998;12:95–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuny LA, Briggs M, Newcombe F, Ratcliff G, Thomas C. Measuring the duration of post-traumatic amnesia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1980;43:377–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WR, Smith A. Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology 1961;5:16–29
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson GS. Wide Range Achievement Test—3 (WRAT—3). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range, Inc.; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Fishco V, Hanna G. The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Geneva, IL: Riverside Publishing Company; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Cengage Learning. Student resource center reading: Ace Practice Tests. 2012 Available online at: http://college.cengage.com/devenglish/resources/reading_ace/students/index.html, accessed 18 May 2012
   Google Scholar
• Readability Formulas. Free readability consensus calculator. 2012. Available online at: http://www.readabilityformulas.com/free-readability-formula-tests.php, accessed 18 May 2012
   Google Scholar
• Williams JR. Guidelines for the use of multimedia in instruction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting 1998;42:1447–1451
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert EH, Samuels SJ, Rasinski T. Comprehension-based silent reading rates: What do we know? What do we need to know? Literacy Research and Instruction 2012;51:110--124
   Google Scholar
• Hudac CM, Kota S, Nedrow JL, Molfese DL. Neural mechanism underlying neurooptometric rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Eye and Brain 2012;2012:1–12
   Google Scholar
• Russell NK. Educational considerations in traumatic brain injury: The role of the speech-language pathologist. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1993;24:67–75
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck J, Tindal GA. Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher 2006;59:636–644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar