Repair sequences in dysarthric conversational speech: A study in interactional phonetics

References

• Auer, P., & Rönfeldt, B. (2004). Prolixity as adaptation: prosody and turn-taking in German conversation with a fluent aphasic. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & C. E. Ford ( Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 171–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M. J., & Local, J. (1996). Advances in impressionistic transcription of disordered speech. In M. J. Ball, & M. Duckworth ( Eds.), Advances in Clinical Phonetics (pp. 51–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenik, D. (2006). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, Version 4.5. Available online at. http://www.praat.org.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N., & Hayes, E. (2003). Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 80–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrie, P., Mackenzie, C., & McCall, J. (2001). The influence of acquired dysarthria on conversational turn taking. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15, 383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2007). Situated phonologies: patterns of phonology in discourse contexts. In M. C. Pennington ( Ed.), Phonology in context (pp. 186–218). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ford, C. E. (2004). Sound patterns in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (1996). Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S. (2002). The phonetics of sequence organization: an investigation of lexical repetition in other-initiated repair sequences in American English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T. (2004). ‘Repetition’ repairs: the relationship of phonetic structure and sequence organization. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & C. E. Ford ( Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 273–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T. (2005). Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: the phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions’. Discourse Processes, 39, 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2005). Motor Speech Disorders. Missouri: Elsevier Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (1998). Conversational turn-taking and repair in fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 12, 1007–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1241–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Conversation and phonetics: essential connections. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & C. E. Ford ( Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: cross-linguistic studies of phonetics and prosody for conversation (pp. 377–400). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. ( Ed.) (2003). Conversation and brain damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: the social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14, 151–171.
   Google Scholar
• Guendouzi, J. A., & Müller, N. (2006). Orthographic transcription. In N. Müller ( Ed.), Multilayered Transcription (pp. 19–40). San Diego: Plural Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation: an interactive view on the extended speaking turns of persons with Wernicke’s aphasia. In C. Goodwin ( Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 163–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leuschel, A., & Docherty, G. J. (1996). Prosodic assessment of dysarthria. In D. A. Robin, K. M. Yorkston, & D. R. Beukelman ( Eds.), Disorders of motor speech: Assessment, treatment, and clinical characterization (pp. 155–178). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liss, J. (2007). The role of speech perception in motor speech disorders. In G. Weismer ( Ed.), Motor speech disorders: Essays for Ray Kent (pp. 187–219). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J. (1996). Conversational phonetics: some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting ( Eds.), Prosody in Conversation (pp. 177–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2005). Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organization and phonological structure of spontaneous speech. Phonetica, 62, 120–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Wootton, T. (1995). Interactional and phonetic aspects of immediate echolalia in autism: a case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 9, 155–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M., & Damico, J. S. (1998). Spontaneous verbal repetition: a social strategy in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 12, 971–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Damico, J. S. (2003). Word searches in aphasia: a case study of the collaborative responses of communicative partners. In C. Goodwin ( Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 211–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 31, 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. (2004). Contrastive Prosody in Adults with Cerebral Palsy. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 189–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation: interactional issues. In C. Goodwin ( Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. J., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 434–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen, K. M., Kent, R. D., Delaney, A. L., & Duffy, J. R. (2006). Parametric quantitative acoustic analysis of conversation produced by speakers with dysarthria and healthy speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 395–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, B. (2008). Acoustic properties of repair sequences in dysarthric conversational speech: an interactional phonetic study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Louisiana at Lafayette.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiljanic, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1677–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarplee, C., & Barrow, E. (1999). Delayed echoing as an interactional resource: a case study of a three year old child on the autistic spectrum. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 13, 449–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar