Sonority and the acquisition of /s/ clusters in children with phonological disorders

References

• Barlow, J. (1997). A constraint-based account of syllable onsets: evidence from developing systems. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. (2001a). Preliminary typology of initial clusters in acquisition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15, 9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. (2001b). The structure of /s/ sequences: evidence from a disordered system. Journal of Child Language, 28, 291–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, B. (1994) Cluster metathesis in phonologically disordered speech: constraints on sonority sequences, mapping directions or segment composition? In P. Koskinen ( Ed.), Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association (pp. 39–50). Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (1998). Spreading in functional phonology. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 22, 1–20 (Rutgers Optimality Archive. 280–0898).
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, D. (1962). Binominals and pitch accent. Lingua, 11, 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston, & M. Beckman ( Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: between grammar and physics of speech (pp. 283–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. (1990). Italian onset structure and the distribution of il and lo. Linguistics, 28, 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donegan, P. J. (1978). On the natural phonology of vowels. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Published in 1985 (New York: Garland).
   Google Scholar
• Durand, J. (1990). Generative and non-linear phonology. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. PhD Dissertation, Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, J. (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, no.20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (1999). Syllable onsets: clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 708–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanadesikan, A. E. (1997). Phonology with ternary scales. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Gnanadesikan, A. E. (2004). Markedness and faithful constraints in child phonology. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld ( Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 109–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goad, H., & Rose, Y. (2004). Input elaboration, head faithfulness, and evidence for representation in the acquisition of left-edge clusters in West Germanic. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld ( Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 109–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1965). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant sequences. Linguistics, 18, 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell, P. (1981). The nature of phonological disability in children. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. A. (1992). Syllable structure and syllable related processes in German. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, M., & Clements, G. N. (1983). Problem book in phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haselwood, H. (1998). An unusual kind of sonority and its implications for phonetic theory. In P. Foulkes ( Ed.), Working papers in linguistics and phonetics 6 (pp. 66–80). Leeds: University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, R., & McCully, C. (1987). Metrical phonology: A coursebook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, D., & Pulleybank, D. (2001). Harmony as faithfulness. Unpublished ms. University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, O. (1904). H. Davidsen ( Ed.), Lehrbook der phonetic. Leirzig and Berlin: B.G. Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, O. (1922). A modern English grammar on historical principles, part I: sounds and spellings. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitatbuchandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Jongstra, W. (2003). Variable and stable clusters: variation in the realization of consonant clusters. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 265–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kager, R., & Zonneveld, W. (1985/1986). Schwa, syllables, and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review, 5, 197–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katamba, F. (1989). An introduction to phonology. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P. (1993). A course in phonetics. 3rd edn. Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G. N. (1990). Local computational networks and the distribution of segments in the Spanish syllable. In M. Ziolkowski,M. Noske, &K. Deaton ( Eds.), Papers from the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2: The Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology (pp. 257–272). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsius, R., & Whitney, W. D. (1865). On relation of vowels and consonants. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 8, 357–373. Reprinted in M. Silverstein (Ed.) Whitney on language: selected writings of William Dwight Whitney (pp. 198–214) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, G. S. (1989). Preliminaries to a theory of phonological substance: the substance of sonority. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman, & M. Noonan ( Eds.), Linguistic Categorization (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series IV: Current issues in Linguistic Theory, volume 61) (pp. 55–67). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ohala, D. (1999). The influence of sonority on children’s cluster reductions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 397–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, N., & Snyder, W. (2004). Acquisition of /s/-initial clusters: a parametric approach. Proceedings of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 436–446). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, F. (2002). Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Pater, J., & Barlow, J. (2003). Constraint conflict in cluster reduction. Journal of Child Language, 30, 487–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, D. M. (1992). Sonority and syllable structure in American sign language. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 407–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In M. Aranoff, & R. T. Oehrle ( Eds.), Language sound structure: studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students (pp. 107–136). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, A. B. (1993). Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska articulation norms project: word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 931–947.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steriade, D. (1990). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. New York: Garland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steriade, D. (1988). Review article: CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Language, 64, 118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. N., & Keyser, S. J. (1989). Primary features and their enhancements in consonants. Language, 65, 81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trommolen, M. (1984). The syllable in Dutch: with special reference to diminutive formation. Dordrecht: Foris publications.
   Google Scholar
• Venneman, T. (1972). On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistische Berichte, 18, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, O. (1871). Sprache und ohr: akustisch-physiologische und pathologische studien. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg and son.
   Google Scholar
• Wyllie-Smith, L., McLeod, S., & Ball, M. J. (2006). Typically developing and speech impaired children’s adherence to the sonority hypothesis. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20, 271–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavaş, M., Ben-David, A., Gerrits, E., Kristoffersen, E., & Simonsen, H. (2008). Sonority and cross-linguistic acquisition of initial s-clusters. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22, 421–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavaş, M., & Someillan, M. (2005). Patterns of acquisition of /s/ clusters. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3, 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Zec, D. (1995). Sonority constraints on syllable structure. Phonology, 12, 85–129.
   Google Scholar