Perception of American English dark /l/ by normally hearing young adult women

References

• Bernstein, L. E. (2005). Phonetic processing by the Speech Perceiving Brain. In D. B. Pisoni, & R. E. Remez ( Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 79–98). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, G. J., Harris, K. S., & Raphael, L. J. (1994). Speech science primer. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, C. D., & McGovern, K. (1977). Perception of /w, r, l, y/ by normally-articulating children. Journal of the Acoustics Society of America, 61, S64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992a). Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992b). ‘Targetless’ schwa: an articulatory analysis. In G. J. Docherty, & D. R. Ladd ( Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody (pp. 26–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1995). Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In F. Bell-Berti, & L. J. Raphael ( Eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues (pp. 19–33). New York: American Institute of Physics.
   Google Scholar
• Browman,C. P., & Goldstein, L. (2000). Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organizing phonological structures. In Les Cahiers de IICP Sommaire, 5, 25–34. Retrieved 14 June 2009 from: http://Haskins.yale.edu/reprints.HL1208.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P., & Local, J. (2007). F2 variations in Newcastle and Leeds English liquid systems. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37, 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Espy-Wilson, C. (1992). Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels /wjrl/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 736–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Brancazio, L. (2000). Coarticulation resistance of American English consonants and its effects on transconsonantal vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Language & Speech, 43, 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Galantucci, B. (2005). The relation of speech perception and production. In D. B. Pisoni, & R. E. Remez ( Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 633–652). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gick, B., Kang, A., & Whalen, D. H. (2002). MRI evidence for commonality in the post-oral articulations of English vowels and liquids. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 357–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, S. B., & Moll, K. L. (1975). Cinefluorographic study of selected allophones of English /l/. Phonetica, 31, 206–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Articulatory phonology: a phonology for public language use. In N. O. Schiller, & A. Meyer ( Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 159–207). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell, P. (1987). Clinical phonology, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Haelsig, P. C., & Madison, C. L. (1986). Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 17, 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S. (1999). Reevaluating assumptions about speech perception: interactive and integrative theories. In J. M. Pickett ( Ed.), The acoustics of speech communication (pp. 232–288). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand, J. M & Nearey T. M (1999). Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3509–3523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, M. (1997). Phonetic variation in intervocalic onset /l/s in English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 115–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. (2005). Speaker normalization in speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni, & R. E. Remez ( Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 363–389). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., & Hsu, C. (2003). Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple ( Eds.), Phonetic interpretation: Papers in laboratory phonology VI (pp. 145–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. & Local, J. (1986) Long-domain resonance patterns in English. In International Conference on Speech Input/Output; Techniques and Applications. Conference publication no. 258. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers; pp. 304–309.
   Google Scholar
• Krakow, R. A. (1999). Physiological organization of syllables: a review. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 23–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachs, L., Weiss, J. W., & Pisoni, D. B. (2000). Use of partial stimulus information by cochlear implant users and listeners with normal hearing in identifying words: some preliminary analyses. Volta Review, 102, 303–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly, I. G. (1981). Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. In T. Myers, J. Laver, & J. Anderson ( Eds.), The cognitive representation of speech (pp. 415–420). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, S., Alwan, A., & Haker, K. (1997). Toward articulatory models for liquid approximants on MRI and EPG data. Part I. The laterals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1064–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, J. Roussel, N., & Buckingham, H. (2007). Contextual variability in American English dark-l. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 523–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. M. (1999). The acoustics of speech communication. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Recasens, D. (1996). An articulatory-perceptual account of vocalization and elision of dark /l/ in the Romance languages. Language & Speech, 39, 63–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recasens, D. (2004). Darkness in [l] as a scalar phonetic property: implications for phonology and articulatory control. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18, 593–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revoile, S. (1999). Hearing loss and the audibility of phoneme cues. In J. M. Pickett ( Ed.), The acoustics of speech communication (pp. 289–323). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Sproat, R., & Fujimura, O. (1993). Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS for Windows, Rel. 11.0.1. (2001). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Traunmüller, H. (1990). Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 97–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, P. (1999). Perception of distributed coarticulatory properties of English /l/ and /ɹ/. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 405–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar