Stimulability: Relationships to other characteristics of children's phonological systems

References

• Bankson, N., & Bernthal, J. E. (1990). Bankson-Bernthal Test of Phonology. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, E. T., & Buck, M. (1958). Prognostic testing for functional articulation disorders among children in the first grade. Journal of Speech Disorders, 23, 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., & Elbert, M. (1984). On the relationship between phonology and learning. In M. Elbert, D. A. Dinnsen, & G. Weismer ( Eds.), Phonological theory and the misarticulating child ( ASHA Monograph No. 22, pp. 59–68). Rockville, MD: ASHA.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., Gierut, J. A., & Chin, S. (1987). Underlying representations and the differentiation of functional misarticulators. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., Dunn, L., & Williams, K. T. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (1989). Maximal opposition approach to phonological treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 9–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (1990). Differential learning of phonological oppositions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 540–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (1992). The conditions and course of clinically induced phonological change. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1049–1063.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2005). Phonological intervention: the how or the what? In A. G. Kamhi and K. E. Pollock ( Eds.), Phonological disorders in children: clinical decision making in assessment and intervention (pp. 201–210). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., Hughes, M. T., & Rowland, S. (1996). Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaspy, A. M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2005). Dynamic assessment in phonological disorders: the scaffolding scale of stimulability. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 220–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (1986). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, B. (2007). Evaluating and enhancing children's phonological systems: research and theory to practice. Greenville, SC: Thinking Publications-University.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, B. W., & Paden, E. P. (1991). Targeting intelligible speech: a phonological approach to remediation. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, L., Nye, C., Schwarz, J., McGinty, A., & Rivera, A. (2008). Methodological quality of intervention research in speech-language pathology: Analysis of 10 years of group-design studies. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kisatsky, T. J. (1967). The prognostic value of Carter-Buck tests in measuring articulation skills of selected kindergarten children. Exceptional Children, 34, 81–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lof, G. L. (1996). Factors associated with speech-sound stimulability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 255–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, T. (2009). The relation between error variability and stimulability in children with SSD. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W. (2002). Clinical problem solving: assessment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W. (2005). A treatment program for enhancing stimulability. In A. G. Kamhi and K. E. Pollock ( Eds.), Phonological disorders in children: clinical decision making in assessment and intervention (pp. 163–173). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W., & Elbert, M. (1996). Enhancing stimulability: a treatment program. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 335–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W., Elbert, M., & Forrest, K. (1999). The relationship between stimulability and phonological acquisition in children with normally developing and disordered phonologies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 347–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M. E. (2005). Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 61–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. W., & Miccio, A. W. (1996). Stimulability: a useful clinical tool. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 237–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J., & Klee, T. (1987). Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 271–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rvachew, S., Nowak, M., & Cloutier, G. (2004). Effect of phonemic perception training on the speech production and phonological awareness skills of children with expressive phonological delay. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 250–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew, S., Rafaat, S., & Martin, M. (1999). Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D. (1993). Four new speech and prosody-voice measures for genetics research and other studies in developmental phonological disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 105–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Lewis, B. A., Tomblin, J. B., McSweeny, J. L., Karlsson, H. B., & Scheer, A. R. (2005). Toward diagnostic and phenotype markers for genetically transmitted speech delay. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 834–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, G., & Cho, J. H. (1985). Socioeconomic indexes and the new 1980 census occupational classification scheme. Social Science Research, 14, 142–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. A. (1996). Assessing stimulability in toddlers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 279–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. A., Edwards, M. L., & Saxman, J. H. (1990). Acoustic validation of phonological knowledge and its relationship to treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 251–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (2000a). Multiple oppositions: case studies of variables in phonological intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (2000b). Multiple oppositions: theoretical foundations for an alternative contrastive intervention approach. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 282–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (2005). A model and structure for phonological intervention. In A. G. Kamhi and K. E. Pollock ( Eds.), Phonological disorders in children: clinical decision making in assessment and intervention (pp. 189–199). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar