498
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Subject–verb agreement, object clitics and wh-questions in bilingual French–Greek SLI: the case study of a French–Greek-speaking child with SLI

, &
Pages 339-367 | Received 28 Oct 2009, Accepted 07 Nov 2010, Published online: 06 Apr 2011

References

  • Adli, A. (2006). French wh-in-situ questions and syntactic optionality: evidence from three data types. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 25, 163–203.
  • Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing Agr: word order, verb- movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 491–539.
  • Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (2000). Greek syntax: a principle and parameter perspective. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 1, 171–222.
  • Anagnostopoulou, E. (1994). Clitic dependencies in modern Greek (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). University of Salzburg.
  • Auger, J. (1994). Pronominal clitics in Québec colloquial French: a morphological analysis (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.
  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1983). The test for reception of grammar. Published by the author and available from Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, University of Manchester, M13 9PL.
  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1994). Grammatical errors in specific language impairment: competence or performance limitations? Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 507–550.
  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: comprehension in specific language impairment. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Chevrie-Muller, C., Simon, A. M., & Fournier, S. (1997). Batterie langage oral et écrit. Mémoire. Attention. (L2MA). Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée. Distribué par TEMA.
  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
  • Clahsen, H., & Dalalakis, J. (1999). Tense and agreement in Greek SLI: a case study. Essex research reports in Linguistics, 24, 1–25.
  • Clahsen, H., Bartke, S., & Gollner, S. (1997). Formal features in impaired grammars: a comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 151–172.
  • Coveney, A. (2010). L'Interrogation directe. Texto! Textes et cultures. In press.
  • Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Crutchley, A., Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (1997). Bilingual children with specific language and standardized assessments: preliminary findings from a study of children in language units. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1(2), 117–134.
  • Dalalakis, J. (1996). Developmental language impairment: evidence from Greek and its implications for morphological representation (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). McGill University.
  • De Cat, C. (2000). Structure building and the acquisition of dislocations in child French. In C. Howell, S. A. Fish and T. Keith-Lucas ( Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 24 (pp. 242–252). S. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • De Cat, C. (2005). French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua, 115, 1195–1219.
  • Dressler, W. U. (2007). Introduction. In S. Laaha & S. Gillis (Eds.), Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 112, 3–9.
  • Eisenbeiss, S. (2010). Production methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth ( Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 11–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Franck, J., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Chillier, L., Frauenfelder, U., Hamann, C., Rizzi L., & Zesiger, P. (2004). Normal and pathological development of subject-verb agreement in speech production: a study on French children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 147–180.
  • Georgas, D., Paraskevopoulos, I., Bezevengis, I., & Giannitsas, N. (1997). Guidelines for the Greek WISC III. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
  • Girbau, D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2007). Phonological working memory in Spanish–English bilingual children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41(2), 124–145.
  • Grüter, T. (2005). Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(3), 363–391.
  • Grüter, T. (2006). Object clitics and null objects in the acquisition of French (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). McGill University.
  • Håkansson, G. (2001). Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 85–99.
  • Håkansson, G., & Nettelbladt, U. (1996). Similarities between SLI and L2 children: evidence from the acquisition of Swedish word order. In C. E. Johnson & J. Gilbert ( Eds.), Children's language. Vol. 9. (pp. 135–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Håkansson, G., Salameh, E.-K., & Nettelbladt, U. (2003). Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children: Swedish-Arabic bilingual children with and without language impairment. Linguistics, 41, 255–288.
  • Hamann, C., Ohayon, S., Dubé, S., Frauenfelder, U. H., Rizzi R., Starke, M., & Zesiger, P. (2003). Aspects of grammatical development in young French children with SLI. Developmental Science, 6(2), 151–158.
  • Hamman, C. (2006). Speculations about early syntax: the production of wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 141–189.
  • Holton, D., Mackridge, P., & Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1997). Greek: a comprehensive grammar of the modern Greek language. London: Routledge.
  • Jakubowicz, C. (2003). Computational complexity and the acquisition of functional categories by French-speaking children with SLI. Linguistics, 41(2), 171–211.
  • Jakubowicz, C. (to appear). Measuring derivational complexity: new evidence from typically-developing and SLI learners of L1-French. Lingua.
  • Jakubowicz, C., & Nash, L. (2001). Functional Categories and syntactic operations in (Ab)normal language acquisition. Brain and Language, 77, 321–333.
  • Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C., & Gérard, Ch.-L. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113–160.
  • Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., & van der Velde, M. (1999). Inflection and past tense morphology in French SLI. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano ( Eds.), BUCLD 23 Proceedings (pp. 289–300). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Kehayia, E. (1997). Lexical access and representation in individuals with developmental language impairment: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10(2/3), 110–138.
  • Lecocq, P. (1996). L' E. CO.S.SE: une epreuve de compréhension syntaxico-semantique. Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presse Universitaire du Septentrion.
  • Lee, S., & Gorman, B. K. (2009). Production of Korean case particles in a Korean–English bilingual child with specific language impairment: a preliminary study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30(3), 167–177.
  • Legendre, G., Culbertson, J., Barriere, I., Nazzi, T., & Goyet, L. (2010). Experimental and empirical evidence for the status and acquisition of subject clitics and agreement marking in adult and child spoken French. In V. Torrens, L. Escobar, A. Gavarro, & J.G. Mangado ( Eds.), Movement and clitics: adult and child grammar (pp.333–360). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Legendre, G., Hagstrom, P., Vainikka, A., & Todorova, M. (2000). Evidence for syntactic competition in the acquisition of tense and agreement in child French. In A. Okrent & J. P. Boyle ( Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Chicago linguistic society meeting (pp.431–443). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  • Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: a grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 156–166.
  • Loeb, D., & Leonard, L.B. (1991). Subject case-marking and verb morphology in normally developing and specifically-language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 340–346.
  • Mathieu, E. (1999). French wh in situ and the intervention effect. In Corrine Iten & Ad Neeleman ( Eds.), UCL working papers in linguistics. Vol. 11. (pp. 441–472). London: Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London.
  • Mathieu, E. (2004). The mapping of form and interpretation: the case of optional WH-movement in French. Lingua, 114, 1090–1132.
  • Mavratza, S. (2007). Specific language impairment in Greek: a study of agreement, tense and the determiner system (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). University of Essex.
  • Orgassa, A., & Weerman, F. (2008). Dutch gender in specific language impairment and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 24(3), 333–364.
  • Paradis, J. (2007). Bilingual children with specific language impairment: theoretical and applied issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 512–564.
  • Paradis, J. (2010). The interface between bilingual development and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 3–28.
  • Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2001). The morphosyntax of specific language impairment in French: an extended optional default account. Language Acquisition, 9, 269–300.
  • Paradis J., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2005/2006). Domain-specific versus domain-general theories of the deficit in SLI: object pronoun acquisition by French-English bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 13(1), 33–62.
  • Paradis, J., Crago, M. F., Genesee, F., & Rice, M. (2003). French–English bilingual children with SLI: how do they compare with their monolingual peers? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 113–127.
  • Philippaki-Warburton, I., Varlokosta, S., Georgiafentis, M., & Kotzoglou, G. (2004). Moving from theta-position: pronominal clitic doubling in Greek. Lingua, 114(8), 963–989.
  • Pizzioli, F., & Schelstraete, M.-A. (2008). Argument-structure complexity in children with specific language impairment: evidences from the use of grammatical morphemes in French. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1–16.
  • Plunkett, B. (2000). The emergence of periphrastic questions in child French. In M. Perkins & S. Howard ( Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 105–117). New York: Kluwer Academic Press/Plenum.
  • Plunkett, B. (2004). Early peripheries in the absence of C. In D. Adger, C. De Cat & G. Tsoulas ( Eds.), Peripheries: syntactic edges and their effect (pp. 383–405) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic press.
  • Prévost, P., Tuller, L. Scheidnes, M., Ferré, S., & Haiden, M. (2010). Computational complexity effects in the acquisition of Wh-questions in child L2 French. Proceedings of the Romance Turn (3). In Press.
  • Radford, A., & Ramos, E. (2001). Case, agreement and EPP: evidence from an English-speaking child with SLI. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 36, 42–81.
  • Restrepo, M. A., & Kruth, K. (2000). Grammatical characteristics of a Spanish–English bilingual child with specific language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21(2), 66–76.
  • Rice, M. L., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1412–1431.
  • Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-Ch., & Rioul, R. (1994). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF/Quadrige.
  • Rooryck, J. (1994). On two types of underspecification: towards a feature theory shared by syntax and phonology, Probus, 6, 207–233.
  • Rothweiler, M. (2007). Multilingualism and language impairments. In P. Auer & L. Wei ( Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 229–246). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Rothweiler, M., Chilla, S., & Babur, E. (2010). Specific language impairment in Turkish: evidence from case morphology in Turkish–German successive bilinguals. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 7, 540–555.
  • Royle, P., & Thordardottir, E. (2008). Elicitation of the passé composé in French preschoolers with and without SLI. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 341–365.
  • Salameh, E.-K., Håkansson, G., & Nettelbladt, U. (2004). Developmental perspectives on bilingual Swedish–Arabic children with and without language impairment: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 65–91.
  • Sinopoulou, U. (2008). Aples erotisis me erotimatiki lexi in-situ: i periptosi ton elinikon (Simple wh-in-situ questions: the case of Greek). Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Greek Linguistics (pp. 1118–1132): http://www.linguist-uoi.gr/cd_web/case4.html.
  • Smith, N., Edwards, S., Stojanovik, V., & Varlokosta, S. (2008). Object clitic pronouns, definite articles and genitive possessive clitics in Greek preschool children with specific language impairment: implications for domain general and domain specific accounts of SLI. BUCLD, 33 (A supplement to the proceedings of the 32nd BUCLD).
  • Stamouli S. (2000. The grammatical categories of tense, aspect and Agr-S in a Greek SLI child: a comparative study of a single case of a Greek SLI child and typically developing Greek children. Proceedings of the 8th conference of the panhellenic association of speech and language therapists (pp.221–238). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
  • Stark, R. E., & Tallal, P. (1981). Selection of children with specific language deficits. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 114–122.
  • Stathopoulou, N. (2009). The linguistic profile of Greek individuals with Down syndrome: Evidence from syntactic and morphological phenomena (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). University of Essex.
  • Stavrakaki, S. (1996). Specific language impairment in Greek: evaluation of person and number agreement, case assignment to overt subjects pronouns and tense marking (Unpublished MA Dissertation). University of Essex.
  • Stavrakaki, S. (2001a). Specific Language Impairment in Greek: aspects of syntactic production and comprehension (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
  • Stavrakaki, S. (2001b). Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language, 77, 419–431.
  • Stavrakaki, S. (2002). A-bar movement constructions in Greek children with SLI: evidence for deficits in the syntactic component of language. In Ε. Fava ( Ed.), Clinical linguistics: theory and applications in speech pathology and therapy. Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 131–153). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Stavrakaki, S. (2005). Greek neurolinguistics: the state-of-the-art. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 5, 181–228.
  • Stavrakaki, S. (2006). Developmental perspectives on specific language impairment: evidence from the production of wh-questions by Greek SLI children over time. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 8(4), 384–396.
  • Stavrakaki S, Tsimpli I. M. (2000). Diagnostic verbal IQ test for school and preschool children: standardization, statistical analysis, and psychometric properties. Proceedings of the 8th conference of the Panhellenic association of speech and language therapists. (pp.95–106).Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
  • Stavrakaki, S., & van der Lely, H. (2010). Production and comprehension of pronouns by Greek children with specific language impairment. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 189–216.
  • Stavrakaki, S., Vogindroukas, I., Chelas, E., & Goushi, S. (2008). Subject-verb agreement in SLI and child L2: a comparative approach to Greek SLI and (un)impaired child L2. In A. Gavarró & M. J. Freitas ( Eds.), Language acquisition and development: proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp. 413–423). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Steenge, J. (2006). Bilingual children with specific language impairment: additionally disadvantaged? (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). Research Centre on Atypical Communication, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Thordardottir, E., & Namazi, M. (2007). Specific language impairment in French-speaking children: beyond grammatical morphology. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 698–715.
  • Thornton, R. 1996. Elicited production. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee and H. S. Cairns ( Eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Tsakali, P. (2006). The syntax and acquisition of pronominal clitics: a cross-linguistic study with a special reference to modern Greek (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). University College London.
  • Tsakali, V., & Wexler, K. (2004). Why children omit clitics in some languages but not in others: new evidence from Greek. In J. van Kampen & S. Baauw ( Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003 (pp. 493–504), Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
  • Tsimpli, I. M. (1990). The clause structure and word order of modern Greek. UCL working papers in linguistics, 2, 226–255.
  • Tsimpli, I. M. (2001). Interpretability and language development: a study of verbal and nominal features in normally developing and SLI Greek Children. Brain & Language, 77, 432–452.
  • Tsimpli, I. M., & Mastropavlou, M. (2007). Feature interpretability in L2 and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck ( Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp.143–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Tsimpli, I. M., & Stavrakaki, S. (1999). The effects of a morphosyntactic deficit in the determiner system: the case of a Greek SLI child. Lingua, 108, 31–85.
  • Ullman, M., & Pierpont, E. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41, 399–433.
  • Varlokosta S. (2000). Paratirisis sto proto stadio tis glosikis anptixis enos Ellinopoulou me Idiki Glosiki Diatarahi (Observations on the first stage of the linguistic development of a Greek SLI child). Proceedings of the 8th conference on speech therapy (pp.160–174).Athina: Ellinika Grammata.
  • Varlokosta S. (2002). (A)symmetries in the acquisition of principle B in typically developing and specifically language impaired children. In I. Lesser ( Ed.), The process of language acquisition: proceedings of the 1999 GALA conference (pp.81–98).Berlin. Peter Lang Verlag.
  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Intelligence scale for children (3rd ed., revised). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Wechsler, D. (2005). WISC-IV, Quatrième edition de l'echelle d'intelligence de wechsler pour enfants et adolescents. Paris: Les Editions du centre de Psychologie.
  • Westman, M., Korkman, M., Mickos, A., & Byring, R. (2008). Language profiles of monolingual and bilingual Finnish preschool children at risk for language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43(6), 699–711.
  • Wexler, K., Schutze, C., & Rice, M. (1998). Subject case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: evidence for the Agr/Tns omission model. Language Acquisition, 7, 317–344.
  • Zuckerman, S., & Hulk, A. (2001). Acquiring optionality in French wh-questions: an experimental study. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 30(2), 71–97.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.