Role of sentence-final particles and prosody in irony comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders

References

• Ackerman, B. P. (1982). Contextual integration and utterance interpretation: The ability of children and adults to interpret sarcastic utterances. Child Development, 53, 1075–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, B. P. (1983). Form and function in children's understanding of ironic utterances. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 487–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, B. P. (1986). Children's sensitivity to comprehension failure in interpreting a nonliteral use of an utterance. Child Development, 57, 485–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2000). Irony as a game of implicitness: Acoustic profiles of ironic communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 275–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attardo, S. J., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 16, 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbe, K. (1995). Irony in context. New York: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, D. M. (1992). “Theory of mind” in Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 877–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, G., & Fox-Tree, J. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language & Speech, 48, 257–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelli, C. A., Nakagawa, N., & Madden, C. M. (1990). How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development, 61, 1824–1841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. K. M. (1996). Gender-marked speech in Cantonese: The case of sentence-final particles je and jek. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 26, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. K. M. (2001). Gender-related use of sentence-final particles in Cantonese. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 57–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Y. R. (1930). A system of tone-letters. Le Maître Phonétique, 45, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D. (2009). Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 126, 1394–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. H. (1986). The phonology of present-day Cantonese. Doctoral Dissertation, University College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Creusere, M. A. (2000). A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children's recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 15, 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Culter, A. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In M. Lagaly, R. Fox, & A. Bruck (Eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 117–127). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Culter, A., & Isard, S. D. (1980). The production of prosody. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 1. (pp. 245–269). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M., Lazenby, A. L., & Lockyer, L. (2001). Inferential language in high-function children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1997). Attribution meaning to deliberately false remarks: The case of irony. In C. Mandell & A. McCabe (Eds.), The problem of meaning: Behavioral and cognitive perspective (pp. 377–414). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., McGovern, A., Qualter, A., & Smarsh, B. (1996). Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development, 67, 3071–3085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A., Luke, K. K., & Nancarrow, O. (2008). Aspects of intonation in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 36, 321–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, R. S. Y. (2000). Final particles in standard Cantonese: Semantic extension and pragmatic inference. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2001). The risks and rewards of ironic communication. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 181–194). Amsterdam: IOS press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, H., & Tobin, Y. (2009). Prosodic analysis is difficult … but worth it: A study in high functioning autism. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 308–315.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T., Dunham. J., & Purdy, K. (2000). Children's comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 227–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F. G. E. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66 (3), 843–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imaizumi, S., Furuya, I., & Yamasaki, K. (2009). Voice as a tool communicating intentions. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 34, 196–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klin, A. (1991). Young autistic children's listening preferences in regard to speech: A possible characterization of the symptom of social withdrawal. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klin, A. (1992). Listening preferences in regard to speech in four children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 763–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuz, R. J. (1996). The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 23–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuz, R. J., & Caucci, G. M. (2009). Social aspects of verbal irony use. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 325–346). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., & Dawson, G. (2005). Links between social and linguistic processing of speech in preschool children with autism: Behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Developmental Science, 8, F1–F12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, H. (1984). Sentence particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, The University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Laval, V., & Bert-Erboul, A. (2005). French-speaking children's understanding of sarcasm: The role of intonation and context. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 610–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, S. P. (1990). The syntax and phonology of Cantonese sentence-final particles. Doctoral Dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. T., & Law, A. (2001). Epistemic modality and the acquisition of Cantonese final particles. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Issues in East Asian language acquisition (pp. 67–128). Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. T., Wong, C. H., Leung, C. S., Man, P., Cheung, P., Szeto, K., & Wong, C. S. P. (1996). The development of grammatical competence in Cantonese-speaking children: Report of Hong Kong RGC. Ear-marked grant, 1991–1994. Hong Kong: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. H., & Yiu, C. (1998). Final “de” and “ge3” – a nominalization analysis for cleft sentences in Mandarin and Cantonese. Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Research Forum, Linguistic Society of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. H., & Yiu, C. (1999). Temporal marking, verbalization and nominalization in the Cantonese particles ‘lei4’ and ‘ge3’. Paper presented at the Annual Research Forum of the Linguistic Society of Hong Kong, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Leekam, S., & Perner, J. (1991). Does the autistic child have a meta-representational deficit? Cognition, 40, 203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretence and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveland, K., Tunali-Kotoski, B., Chen, R., Brelsford, K., & Ortegon, J. (1995). Intermodal perception of affect by persons with autism or Down syndrome. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 409–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, K. K. (1990). Utterance particles in Cantonese conversation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2004). An exploration of causes of non-literal language problems in individuals with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 311–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (1994). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B., & Rogers, S. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic children: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A. (1998). The acquisition of modality: Implications for theories of semantic representation. Mind and Language, 13, 370–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppé, S. (2011). Assessment of prosodic ability in atypical populations with special reference to high-functioning autism. In V. Stojanovik, & J. Setter (Eds.), Speech prosody in atypical populations: Assessment and remediation (pp. 1–23). Guildford, UK: J&R Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Peppé, S., McCann, J., Gibbon, F., O'Hare, A., & Rutherford, M. (2007). Receptive and expressive prosodic ability in children with high-functioning autism. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1015–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekam, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, K. L. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, K. L. (1948). Tone languages. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, T., & Peterson, C. (1990). A comparative study of autistic subjects' performance at two levels of visual and cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 555–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 483–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 130–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swettenham, J. (1996). Can children with autism be taught to understand false belief using computers? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swettenham, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Gomez, J. C., & Walsh, S. (1996). What's inside a person's head? Conceiving of the mind as a camera helps children with autism develop an alternative theory of mind. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1, 73–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang, S. W. (1998). Parametrization of features in syntax. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• T'sou, B., Lee, H. T., Tung, P., Man, Y., Chan, A., To, C. K. S., Cheung, P. S. P., Ng, A., & Chan, Y. (2006). Hong Kong Cantonese Oral Language Assessment Scale. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Utsumi, A. (2000). A verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1777–1806.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. (2010). The English equivalents of Cantonese sentence-final particles: A contrastive analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. T., Lee, S. S., Sigman, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). Neural basis of irony comprehension in children with autism: The role of prosody and context. Brain, 129, 932–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., & Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and the constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar