Accent identification by adults with aphasia

References

• Adank, P., Evans, B., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 520–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, C. M., Randi, C., Martin, R. C., & Martin, N. (2012). Relations between short-term memory deficits, semantic processing, and executive function. Aphasiology, 26, 428–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayard, D., Weatherall, A., Gallois, C., & Pittam, J. (2001). Pax Americana? Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia and America. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 22–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, C., To, C. T., & Newton, C. (2012). Accent on communication: The impact of regional and foreign accent on comprehension in adults with aphasia. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34, 1024–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, C. N. (1967). Some acoustic parameters of speech and their relationships to the perception of dialect differences. TESOL Quarterly, 1, 20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647–3658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009). Free classification of American English dialects by native and non-native listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 436–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., Conrey, B., & Pisoni, D. B. (2005). Effects of talker gender on dialect categorization. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 182–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. (2004). Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 111–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunton, J., Bruce, C., & Newton, C. (2011). Investigating the impact of unfamiliar speaker accent on auditory comprehension in adults with aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1276–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. J. (Eds.) (1999). Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, E., & Post, B. (2002). Intonational variation in English. In B. Bel, & I. Marlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the speech prosody 2002 conference, 11–13 April 2002. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 343–346.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, E., Post, B., & Nolan, F. (2001). The IViE corpus [data file]. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/files/apps/old_IViE
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23, 351–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerswill, P., & Williams, A. (2002). Dialect recognition and speech community focusing in new and old towns in England: The effects of dialect leveling, demography and social networks. In D. Long (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (Vol. 2, pp. 173–205). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery (WAB). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N., Kohena, K., Kalinyak-Fliszara, M., Soverib, A., & Laineb, M. (2012). Effects of working memory load on processing of sounds and meanings of words in aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 462–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, C., & Bruce, C. (2011). Accent on aphasia. Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Summer 2011, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 62–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 355–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, M. (2002). Executive function ability in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 549–557.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, M., & Dietz, A. (2010). Factors influencing AAC usage by individuals with aphasia. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, C. (1997). The unknown Englishes? Testing German students' ability to identify varieties of English. In E. W. Schneider (Ed.), Englishes around the world (pp. 93–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bezooijen, R., & Gooskens, C. (1999). Identification of language varieties: The contribution of different linguistic levels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieru, B., de Mareüil, P. B., & Adda-Decker, M. (2011). Characterisation and identification of non-native French accents. Speech Communication, 53, 292–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Garrett, P., & Coupland, N. (1999). Dialect recognition. In D. R. Preston (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (pp. 345–358). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., & McCoy, S. L. (2005). Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 144–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar