The uses of overlap: Carer–child interaction involving a nine-year-old boy with auditory neuropathy

References

• Armstrong, S., & Ainley, M. (1988). South Tyneside Assessment of Syntactic Structure (STASS). Ponteland: STASS Publications
   Google Scholar
• Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E., & Selting, M. (2010). Prosody in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Test for the reception of grammar – version 2 (TROG2). London: Psychological Corporation
   Google Scholar
• Brannigan, G. (1979). Some reasons why successive single word utterances are not. Journal of Child Language, 6, 411–421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Sherbenou, R., & Johnsen, K. (1998). Test of nonverbal tntelligence – version 3 (TONI 3). UK: Pearson Assessments
   Google Scholar
• Carle, E. (2002). The very hungry caterpillar. UK: Puffin
   Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., & Dykins, J. (1991). Mother--child interactions with language impaired children and their siblings. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 337–354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corrin, J., Tarplee, C., & Wells, B. (2001). Interactional linguistics and language development: A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntax. In: M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 199–255). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamin
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, L. K. (2000). Reading behaviours of mothers and their children with language impairments during repeated storybook reading. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 177–196
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D., Fletcher, M., & Garman, P. (1989). The grammatical analysis of language disability (2nd ed.). London: Whurr
   Google Scholar
• Ferm, U. (2006). Using language in social activities at home – A study of interaction between caregivers and children with and without disabilities. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, 31. Department of Linguistics, Göteburg University, Sweden
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, M. A., & Cherington, S. M. (2009). The development of other-related conversational skills: A case study of conversational repair during the early years. First Language, 29, 166–191
   Google Scholar
• French, P., & Local, J. (1983). Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 17–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorisch, J., Wells, B., & Brown, G. J. (2012). Pitch contour matching and interactional alignment across turns: An acoustic investigation. Language & Speech, 55, 57–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., (1984). Notes on someorderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D'Urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.). Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore
   Google Scholar
• Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2003). Topic control during shared storybook reading. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23, 137–150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtić, E., Brown, G. J., & Wells, B. (2009). Fundamental frequency height as a resource for the management of overlap in talk-in-interaction. In D. Barth-Weingarten, D. Dehé, & A. Wichmann (Eds.), Where prosody meets pragmatics, studies in pragmatics 8 (pp. 183–204). Bingley: Emerald
   Google Scholar
• Kurtić, E., Brown, G. J., & Wells, B. (2013). Resources for the management of overlap in talk-in-interaction. Speech Communication, 55, 721–743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G., (1999). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk of interaction. In B. Fox & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2005). Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organisation and phonological structures of spontaneous speech. Phonetica, 62, 120–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, K. (2001). Eugene the plane spotter. London: Bloomsbury
   Google Scholar
• Marschark, M., Rhoten, C., & Fabich, M. (2007). Effects of cochlear implants on children’s reading and academic achievement. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 12, 215–229
   Google Scholar
• Most, T., & Peled, M. (2007). Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 12, 350–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2007). Peace at last. London: MacMillan
   Google Scholar
• Northern, J. L., & Downs, M. P. (2002). Hearing in children (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
   Google Scholar
• O’Halpin, R. (2010). The perception and production of stress and intonation by children with cochlear implants. Doctoral thesis. University of London
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A. (1999). Phonological Evaluation & Transcription of Audio-Visual language – PETAL. Bicester: Winslow Press
   Google Scholar
• Radford, J., & Mahon, M. (2010). Multi-modal participation in storybook sharing. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 209–226). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, UK
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C. (1995). Word-Finding Vocabulary Test (RWFT). Bicester: Winslow Press
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organisation of turn taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. P., & Ertmer, D. J. (2009). The development of intonation in young children with cochlear implants: A preliminary study of the influence of age and length of implant experiences. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 665–679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. P., & Ertmer, D. J. (2012). Children’s development of intonation during first year of cochlear implant experience. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26, 51–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, P. C., Fortnum, H. M., Barton, G. R., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2006). Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, I: Auditory performance, communication skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation. Ear & Hearing, 27, 161–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepek-Reed, B. (2006). Prosodic orientation in English conversation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Wells, B., & Corrin, J. (2004). Prosodic resources, turn taking and overlap in children’s talk-in-interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation (pp. 119–143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Wells, B., & Macfarlane, S. (1998). Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech, 41, 265–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, B. (2010). Tonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interaction. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 243–262). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Stephens, H. (Eds.) (2004). Nuffield Centre Dyspraxia Programme. Windsor, UK: The Miracle Factory
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, F. G., & Liu, S. (2006). Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 49, 367–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar