Learning in the tutorial group: A balance between individual freedom and institutional control

References

• Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: SAGE Publications
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, T., & Moore, S. (2011). Students maximizing the potential of the problem-based learning tutorial: Generating dialogic knowing. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New approaches to problem-based learning: Revitalising your practice in higher education (pp. 115–129). New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–12
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press
   Google Scholar
• Bourner, J., Hughes, M., & Bourner, T. (2001). First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 19–39
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (1991). Group process analysis. In S. Brown & P. Dove (Eds.), Self- and Peer assessment, 1527, Birmingham, Standing Conference on Educational Development, Paper 63
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, J. (1994). Further developments in peer assessment of group projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 19, 29–35
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1975). Selfdirected learning. A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago: Follett
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311, 299--302
   Google Scholar
• Leijk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2001). Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 61–72
   Google Scholar
• Lohfeld, L., Neville, A., & Norman, G. (2005). PBL in undergraduate medical education: A qualitative study of the views of Canadian residents. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10, 189–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungman, A., Uhlin, L., Hård af Segerstad, H., & Hult, H. (2010). NSI projektet -- en utredning av studenters och lärares synpunkter på utbildningen och dess förutsättningar (the student satisfaction project -- an investigation of students and teachers opinion on the education and its prerequisites). Hälsouniversitetet, Linköping
   Google Scholar
• Maudsley, G., Williams, E. M. I., & Taylor, D. C. M. (2008). Problem-based learning at the receiving end: A ‘mixed methods’ study of junior medical students’ perspectives. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 435–451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Nöjd student index (student satisfaction index). (2008). Retrieved from http://www.student.liu.se/nsi/arkiv-gamla-sidor/resultatrapporter/1.43817/Laesinstruktioner_NSI_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nordenlöw, M. (2010). Assessment is the essence of professions – an interview with professor Bengt Olsson (Bedömning är professionens kärna – intervju med professor Bengt Olsson). Fotnoten, 27--28. Retrieved from http://www.lararnasnyheter.se/bild-skolan/2010/05/20/bedomning-ar-professionens-karna
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (Ed.). (1989). Introduction. In Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 1--24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Retna, K. A., Chong, E., & Cavana, R. Y. (2009). Tutors and tutorials: Students’ perceptions in a New Zealand university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31, 251–260
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, C., Lundeborg, I., & McAllister, A. (2012). Specific and general competencies of graduates from Swedish speech and language pathology educations. In S. Bridges, C. McGrath, & T. Whitehill (Eds), Researching problem-based learning in clinical education: The next generation (pp. 47–58). New York: Springer Verlag
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Problem based learning: An introduction. Instructional Science, 22, 247–250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective – A structural-equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silén, C. (2000). Between chaos and cosmos – On own responsibility and independence in learning (Mellan kaos och kosmos – om eget ansvar och självständighet i lärande) (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Linköping University, Department of Behavioral Sciences, No. 73
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Higher Education Act (2007). §8. The Swedish Code of Statutes (SFS)
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., & Öberg, G. (2007). Learning in focus groups: An analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qualitative Research, 7, 249–267
   Google Scholar