References
- Brännström, K. J., Lantz, J., Nielsen, L. H., & Olsen, S. Ø. (2012). Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials. International Journal of Audiology, 51, 146–156
- Bruce, G. (1998). Allmän och svensk prosodi [General and Swedish prosody] Volume 16. Lund: Reprocentralen
- Firszt, J. B., Holden, L. K., Skinner, M. W., Tobey, E. A., Peterson, A., Gaggl, W., Runge-Samuelson, C. L., & Wackym, P. A. (2004). Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear and Hearing, 25, 375–387
- Fischer-Jorgensen, E. (1987). Segment duration in Danish words: Dependency on higher level phonological units. In honor of Ilse Lehiste, Pühendusteos, 6, 51--73
- Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489–504
- Gussenhoven, C. (2008). Notions and subnotions in information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 381–395
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199–244
- Hansson, P. (2002). Articulation rate variation in South Swedish phrases. Paper presented at Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, France, 11--13 April. Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 371–374
- Lindblom, B. (1968). Temporal organization of syllable production. Quarterly Progress and Status Report: KTH Department for Music, Speech and Hearing, 9, 1–5
- Magnusson, L. (1995). Reliable clinical determination of speech recognition scores using Swedish PB words in speech-weighted noise. Scandinavian Audiology, 24, 217–223
- Meister, H., Landwehr, M., Pyschny, V., Wagner, P., & Walger, M. (2011). The perception of sentence stress in cochlear implant recipients. Ear and Hearing, 32, 459–467
- Morris, R. J., BrownJr, W. S., Hicks, D. M., & Howell, E. (1995). Phonational profiles of male trained singers and nonsingers. Journal of Voice, 9, 142–148
- Morrison, G. S., & Kondaurova, M. V. (2009). Analysis of categorical response data: use logistic regression rather than endpoint-difference scores or discriminant analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 2159–2162
- Most, T., Harel, T., Shpak, T., & Luntz, M. (2011). Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 54, 668–678
- Oller, D. K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1235–1247
- Peng, S. C., Lu, N., & Chatterjee, M. (2009). Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners. Audiology and Neurotology, 14, 327–337
- Rogers, C. F., Healy, E. W., & Montgomery, A. A. (2006). Sensitivity to isolated and concurrent intensity and fundamental frequency increments by cochlear implant users under natural listening conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2276–2287
- Winn, M. B., Chatterjee, M., & Idsardi, W. J. (2012). The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: Effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 1465–1479