Propositional idea density in older men’s written language: Findings from the HIMS study using computerised analysis

References

• Armstrong, E., Ferguson, A., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2013). Discourse and functional approaches to aphasia. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens, & C. Potagas (Eds.), Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 217–232). Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, P. J., Stennes, L., & Haight, J. C. (2003). Representation of the inner self in autobiography: Women's and men's use of internal states language in personal narratives. Memory, 11, 27–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., & Covington, M. (2007). Computerized propositional idea density rater 3 (CPIDR 3). Georgia: Artificial Intelligence Center, University of Georgia
   Google Scholar
• Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2004). Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 21–24
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Spencer, E., Ferguson, A., Craig, H., Colyvas, K., & Worrall, L. (2013). Propositional idea density in aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 992–1009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chand, V., Baynes, K., Bonnici, L. M., & Farais, S. T. (2012). A rubric for extratcing idea density from oral language samples. Current Protocols in Neuroscience, Chapter Unit 10.1. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471142301.ns1005s58/full
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H., Anstey, K. J., Leach, L. S., & MacKinnon, A. J. (2007). Intelligence, education, and the brain reserve hypothesis. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 133–188). New York: Psychology Press
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J. (2014). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis
   Google Scholar
• Covington, M. A. (2012). CPIDR 5.1 user manual. Athens, GA: CASPR, Artificial Intelligence Center, University of Georgia
   Google Scholar
• Craig, H., & Whipp, R. (2010). Old spellings, new methods: Automated procedures for indeterminate linguistic data. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25, 37–52
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J. (2013). What to do about bad language on the internet. Paper presented at the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, GA
   Google Scholar
• Engelman, M., Agree, E. M., Meoni, L. A., & Klag, M. J. (2010). Propositional density and cognitive function in later life: Findings from the Precusors Study. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65B, 706–711
   Google Scholar
• Farais, S. T., Chand, V., Bonnici, L., Baynes, K., Harvey, D., Mungas, D., & Reed, B. (2012). Idea density measured in late life predicts subsequent cognitive trajectories: Implications for the measurement of cognitive reserve. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67, 677–686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Spencer, E., Craig, H., & Colyvas, K. (2014). PropositionaL idea density in women's written language over the life span: Computertized analysis. Cortex, 55, 107–121
   Google Scholar
• Garrard, P. (2009). Cognitive archeology: Uses, methods and results. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 250–265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrard, P., Maloney, L. M., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2005). The effects of very early Alzheimer’s disease on the characteristics of writing by a renowned author. Brain, 128, 250–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernstein, M., Westerhausen, R., Korsnes, M. S., & Hugdahl, K. (2013). Sex differences in language asymmetry are age-dependent and small: A large-scale, consonantevowel dichotic listening study with behavioral and fMRI data. Cortex, 49, 1910–1921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Paolillo, J. C. (2006). Gender and variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10, 439–459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L., & English Spelling Society. (2010). The Changing face of spelling on the internet: A research document drawn from research at Manchester University 2010. Retrived from http://www.spellingsociety.org/media/spelling-on-the-internet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S. (2012). The interaction of linguistic constraints, working memory and aging on language production and comprehension. In M. Naveh-Benjamin & N. Ohta (Eds.), Memory and ageing: Current issues and future directions (pp. 31–47). Hoboken, NJ: Psychology Press
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Greiner, L. H., Prenovost, K., & Mitzner, T. L. (2001). Language decline across the lifespan: Findings from the Nun Study. Psychology & Aging, 16, 227–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., & Kemtes, K. (2012). Aging and message production and comprehension. In D. C. Park (Ed.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 197–213). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., & Sumner, A. (2001). The structure of verbal abilities in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 16, 312–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Thomson, M., & Marquis, J. (2001). Longitudinal change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional density. Psychology & Aging, 16, 600–614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancashire, I. (2010). Forgetful muses: Reading the author in the text. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
   Google Scholar
• Le, X., Lancashire, I., Hirst, G., & Jokel, R. (2011). Longitudinal detection of dementia thorugh lexical and syntactic changes in writing: A case study of three British novelists. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26, 435–461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzner, T. L., & Kemper, S. (2003). Oral and written language in late adulthood: Findings from the Nun Study. Experimental Aging Research, 29, 457–474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. L., Groom, C. L., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211–236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. C. (2012). The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In D. C. Park (Ed.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 3–21). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis
   Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., & Hall Gutchess, A. (2012). Cognitive aging and everyday life. In D. C. Park (Ed.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 217–232). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis
   Google Scholar
• Riley, K. P., Snowdon, D. A., Desrosiers, M. F., & Markesbery, W. R. (2005). Early life linguistic ability, late life cognitive function, and neuropathology: Findings from the Nun Study. Neurobiology of Aging, 26, 341–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS V9.2(TS2M2). Cary, NY: SAS Institute
   Google Scholar
• Snowdon, D. (2001). Aging with grace: What the Nun Study teaches us about leading longer, healthier, and more meaningful lives. (US edition ed.). New York: Bantam Books
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, E., Craig, H., Ferguson, A., & Colyvas, K. (2012). Language and ageing: Exploring propositional density in written language: Stability over time. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 26, 743–754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. Milson's Point, NSW: Random House
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1977). The construction and use of a propositional text base. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Psychology Department
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T., Miranda, R. A., & Travers, M. L. (2011). Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. In J. B. Becker, K. J. Berkley, E. Hampson, J. P. Herman & E. A. Young (Eds.), Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior (pp. 291–309). Cary, NC: Oxford Univeristy Press
   Google Scholar