A procedure to select and train persons for narrow phonetic transcription by consensus

References

• Amorosa H., von Benda U., Wagner E., Keck A. Transcribing phonetic detail in the speech of unintelligible children: a comparison of procedures. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1985; 20: 281–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brutten S., Angelis P., Perkins K. Music and memory: predictors for attained ESL oral proficiency. Language Learning 1985; 35: 299–313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush C., Edwards M., Luckau J., Stoel C., Macken M., Petersen J. On specifying a system for transcribing consonants in child language; a working paper with examples from American English and Mexican Spanish. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development. Committee on Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 1973; 3
   Google Scholar
• Chial M. R. Graphical computer tools for clinical practice. 1986, (in submission)
   Google Scholar
• Costley M., Broen P. The nature of listener disagreement in judging misarticulated speech. 1976, (Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Houston, Texas).
   Google Scholar
• Daniloff R. G., Wilcox K., Stephens M. I. An acoustic-articulatory description of children's defective /s/ productions. Journal of Communicative Disorders 1980; 13: 347–363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew D., Jensen P. The phonetic transcription proficiency test: description and preliminary evaluation. Speech Monographs 1973; 40: 38–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedrich W., Bangert J. Articulation Learning. College Hill Press, San Diego, California 1980
   Google Scholar
• Estrem T., Broen P. A. Early phonological and lexical choice of children with cleft palate. Miniseminar presented at Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Francisco, California 1984
   Google Scholar
• Fokes J., Bond Z., Ritter P., Krackenfels D. Phonetics instruction and protocol analysis. 1986, (Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Detroit, Michigan).
   Google Scholar
• Gardner R., Lalonde R., Moorcroft R. The role of attitudes and motivation in second language learning: correlational and experimental considerations. Language Learning 1985; 35: 207–227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiora A., Brannon C., Dull C. Empathy and second language learning. Language Learning 1972; 22: 111–130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwell P. Clinical Phonology. Aspen Publications, Rockville, Maryland 1982
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P. Comment on the terms ‘phonetics’ and ‘phonology’ as applied in the investigation of speech disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1985a; 20: 165–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunwell P. Phonological Assessment of Child Speech. College Hill Press, San Diego, California 1985b
   Google Scholar
• Harris J., Cottam P. Phonetic features and phonological features in speech assessment. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1985; 20: 61–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins P. A tutorial comment on Harris and Cottam. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1985; 20: 75–80
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett N. Phonological versus phonetic disorders: Some suggested modifications to the current use of the distinction. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1985; 20: 155–164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman P., Schuckers G. Audio-recording effects upon judgement reliability of children's /r/ misarticulations. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1978; 47: 451–456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R. D., Bauer H. R. Vocalizations of one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 1985; 12: 491–526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R. D., Murray A. D. Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6, and 9 months. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1982; 72: 353–365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P. Macintosh usage for linguistics (UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics. Los Angeles, California 1985a; 60
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged P. Redefining the scope of phonology (UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 60. Los Angeles, California 1985b
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B., Marengo K. MULTIBET 1.0: A proposal for an ASCII translation and a set of names for extended IPA notation. Transcript Analysis, 3 (No. 1). Department of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1986a; 83–96
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B., Marengo K. UNIBET 1.0: A proposal for a single-character translation of IPA for English. Transcript Analysis. Department of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1986b; 3: 97–98, No. 1
   Google Scholar
• Norris M., Harden J., Bell D. Listener agreement on articulation errors of four-and five-year-old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1980; 45: 378–389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oller D., Eilers R. Phonetic expectation and transcription validity. Phonetica 1975; 31: 288–304, (Final Report of the) PRDS Project Working Party (1983) The phonetic representation of disordered speech (London: the King's Fund).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell E., Suter R. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: a reexamination. Language Learning 1980; 30: 271–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg L. Articulation judgements: some perceptual considerations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1972; 15: 876–882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg L. PEPPER: Programs to Examine Phonetic and Phonologic Evaluation Records. Software Development and Distribution Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1986
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg L., Kent R. Clinical Phonetics. MacMillan, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg L., Kwiatkowski J. Natural Process Analysis (NPA): A Procedure for Phonological Analysis of Continuous Speech Samples. Macmillan, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg L., Kwiatkowski J. Computer-assisted natural process analysis (NPA): Recent issues and data. Seminars in Speech and Language 1983; 4: 389–406
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg L., Kwiatkowski J., Best S., Hengst J., Terselic-Weber B. Characteristics of children with phonologic disorders of unknown origin. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 140–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg L., Kwiatkowski J., Hoffmann K. A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984; 11: 456–465
   Google Scholar
• Stephens M., Daniloff R. A methodological study of factors affecting the judgement of misarticulated /s/. Journal of Communication Disorders 1977; 10: 207–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gamon C. Phonetic inventories 15-24 months: a longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1985; 28: 505–512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor L., Catford J., Guiora A., Lane H. Psychological variables and ability to pronounce a second language. Language and Speech 1971; 14: 146–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost J. Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Journal 1981; 18: 193–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weismer G. Acoustic analyses strategies for the refinement of phonological analysis. Phonological theory and the misarticulating child, M. Elbert, D. Dinnsen, G. Weismer. ASHA Monographs, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, Maryland 1984; 22: 30–52
   Google Scholar