Changes in Functioning Between Days 5 and 10 After Stroke in Elderly

REFERENCES

• Albert, M.L. (1973). A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23, 658–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelros, P., Nydevik, I., Seiger, A., & Terent, A. (2002). Predictors of severe stroke: Influence of preexisting dementia and cardiac disorders. Stroke, 33, 2357–2362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.M., Hsieh, C.L., Lo, S.K., Liaw, L.J., Chen, S.M., & Lin, J.H. (2007). The test–retest reliability of 2 mobility performance tests in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21, 347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen, F.M., Wade, D.T., Robb, G.F., & Bradshaw, C.M. (1991). The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. International Disability Studies, 13, 50–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colton, B. (1974). Statistics in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, P.W., Jorgensen, H.S., & Wade, D.T. (2000). Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke, 31, 1429–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dureman, I., Kebbon, L., & Österberg, E. (1971). Manual till DS-batteriet. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth-Marnat, G., & Teal, M. (2000). Block design as a measure of everyday spatial ability: A study of ecological validity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(2), 522–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G.H., Osoba, D., Wu, A.W., Wyrwich, K.W., Norman, G.R., & Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinical Procedings, 77, 371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, S.M., & Fragala-Pinkham, M.A. (2006). Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 86, 735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handschu, R., Haslbeck, M., Hartmann, A., Fellgiebel, A., Kolominsky-Rabas, P., Schneider, D., (2005). Mortality prediction in critical care for acute stroke: Severity of illness-score or coma-scale? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 252, 1249–1254.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir, A., & Katz, N. (1995). Validity of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT): Relationships with functional tasks. American Journal Occupational Therapy, 49(6), 507–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojat, M., & Xu, G. (2004). A visitor's guide to effect sizes: Statistical significance versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 9, 241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.L., Hsueh, I.P., & Mao, H.F. (2000). Validity and responsiveness of the rivermead mobility index in stroke patients. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32(3), 140–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh, Y.W., Wang, C.H., Wu, S.C., Chen, P.C., Sheu, C.F., & Hsieh, C.L. (2007). Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21(3), 233–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iyer, L.V., Haley, S.M., Watkins, M.P., & Dumas, H.M. (2003). Establishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 83, 888–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H.S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H.O., Vive-Larsen, J., Støier, M., & Olsen, T.S. (1995). Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasner, S.E. (2006). Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurology, 5, 603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, F.I., & Barthel, D.W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mesulam, M.-M. (1985). Attention, confusial states and neglect. Principles of behavioural neurology. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, K. (1996). The Glasgow Coma Scale: A critical appraisal of its clinimetric properties. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(7), 755–763.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salter, K., Jutai, J.W., Teasell, R., Foley, N.C., & Bitensky, J. (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 191–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsa, G., Edelman, D., Rothman, M.L., Williams, G.R., Lipscomb, J., & Matchar, D. (1999). Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: A general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics, 15, 141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. (1985). Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke—Background and study protocol. Stroke, 16, 885–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerfeld, D.K., & von Arbin, M. (2001). Disability test 10 days after acute stroke to predict early discharge home in patients 65 years and older. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15(5), 528–534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sprigg, N., Gray, L.J., Bath, P.M., Lindenstrøm, E., Boysen, G., De Deyn, P.P., (2007). Early recovery and functional outcome are related with causal stroke subtype: Data from the tinzaparin in acute ischemic stroke trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 16(4), 180–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone, S.P., Halligan, P.W., Wilson, B., Greenwood, R.J., & Marshall, J.C. (1991). Performance of age-matched controls on a battery of visuo-spatial neglect tests. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 54(4), 341–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. (2007). Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 17, CD000197.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2(7872), 81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, D.T. (1992). Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. In Oxford medical publications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, D.T., & Collin, C. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10(2), 64–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, revised. New York: Psychological Corp.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning disability and health, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved April 2010 from http://www.who.int.classification/icf
   Google Scholar
• Zwecker, M., Levenkrohn, S., Fleisig, Y., Zeilig, G., Ohry, A., & Adunsky, A. (2002). Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment: Relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(3), 342–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar