Binocular Interaction in Post-LASIK Subjects with Unsatisfactory Outcome

REFERENCES

• Howard IP, Rogers BJ.Binocular masking and transfer. In: Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford Psychology Series No. 29. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995; pp. 349–380.
   Google Scholar
• Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat’s visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 1986; 56:221–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhan S, Gilchrist J. The importance of measuring binocular contrast sensitivity in unilateral cataract. Eye 1991;5:31–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhan S. Binocular performance in patients with unilateral cataract using the Regan test: Binocular summation and inhibition with low-contrast charts. Eye 1993;7:59–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RH, Misson GP, Moseley MJ. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in cataract: Summation and inhibition of visual performance. Eye 1991;5:704–707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azen SP, Varma R, Preston-Martin S, et al. Binocular visual acuity summation and inhibition in ocular epidemiological study: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1742–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comas M, Castells X, Acosta ER, et al. Impact of differences between eyes on binocular measures of vision in patients with cataracts. Eye 2007;21:702–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhan S, Gilchrist J. Binocular contrast sensitivity with monocular glare disability. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990;10:37–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhan S, Gilchrist J, Douthwaite W, et al. Binocular inhibition: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67:688–691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pardhan S, Gilchrist J, Douthwaite W. The effect of spatial frequency on binocular contrast inhibition. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989;9:46–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist J, McIver C. Fechner’s paradox in binocular contrast sensitivity. Vision Res 1985;25:609–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist J, Pardhan S. Binocular contrast detection with unequal monocular illuminance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987;7:373–377.
   Google Scholar
• Pardhan S, Gilchrist J.Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;82:239–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holopigian K, Blake R, Greenwald MJ. Selective losses in binocular vision in anisometropic amblyopes. Vision Res 1986;26:621–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhan S, Gilchrist J. The effect of monocular defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990;10:33–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormack LK, Stevenson SB, Landers DD. Interactions of spatial frequency and unequal monocular contrasts in stereopsis. Perception 1997;26:1121–1136.
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta JR, Anera RG, Jimenez R, et al. Impact of interocular differences in corneal asphericity on binocular summation. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:279–284.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg AP. Next generation contrast sensitivity testing. In: Rosenthal BP, Cole RG ( Eds.). Functional Assessment of Low Vision. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc., 1996; pp. 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Vision and driving: State rules/regulations/policies. Schulchner RJ. Available at: http://www.lowvisioncare.com/visionlaws.htm. (Last accessed 14 January 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Social Security Administration. Listing of impairments; 1997. 20 CFR 404, 1525.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin GS, Muñoz B, Bandeen–Roche K, et al. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:3327–3334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhan S, Elliott DB. Clinical measurements of binocular summation and inhibition in patients with cataract. Clin Vision Sci 1991;6:355–359.
   Google Scholar
• Pardhan SA. A comparison of binocular summation in young and older patients. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:315–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D, Blake R, Halpern DL. Disparity range for binocular summation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeValois RL, De Valois KK. Spatial Vision. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988; pp. 176–211.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs MB, Nachmias J, Robson JG. Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. JOSA 1971;61:1176–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg AP.Spatial filtering and vision: Implications for normal and abnormal vision. In: LM Proenz, JM Enoch, A Jampolsky (Eds.). Clinical Applications of Visual Psychophysics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981; pp. 70–106.
   Google Scholar
• Packer M, Ginsburg AP. Testing and reporting contrast sensitivity. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:359–361.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity and functional vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2003;43:5–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods RL, Wood JM. The role of contrast sensitivity charts and contrast letter charts in clinical practice. Clin Exp Optom 1995;78:43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Legge GE.Binocular contrast summation—I. Detection and discrimination. Vision Res 1984;24:373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearse MA Jr, Freeman RD. Binocular summation in orientation discrimination depends on stimulus contrast and duration. Vision Res 1994;34:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity: Determining the visual quality and function of cataract, intraocular lenses and refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jindra LF, Zemon V. Contrast sensitivity testing: A more complete assessment of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989;15:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodis-Wollner I. Detection of visual defects using the contrast sensitivity function. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1980;20:135–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar