118
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Grading Contact Lens Complications: The Effect of Knowledge on Grading Accuracy

&
Pages 1074-1081 | Received 07 May 2009, Accepted 14 Sep 2009, Published online: 03 Dec 2009

REFERENCES

  • O’Donnell C, Wolffsohn JS. Grading of corneal transparency. CLAE. 2004;27:161–170.
  • Papas EB. Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:687–691.
  • Wolffsohn JS, Purslow C. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital analysis. CLAE. 2003;26:27–35.
  • Schulze MM, Hutchings N, Simpson TL. The use of fractal analysis and photometry to estimate the accuracy of bulbar redness grading scales. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1398–1406.
  • Millán MS, Pérez-Cabré E, Abril HC, et al. Evaluación objetiva de la hiperemia de la conjuntiva tarsal superior mediante análisis de imagen. Ensayo preliminar. Rev Esp Contact. 2005;12:9–15.
  • Sorbara L, Simpson T, Duench S, et al. Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales. CLAE. 2007;30:53–59.
  • Institute for Eye Research. Appendix B. In: Phillips AJ, Speedwell L (Eds.). Contact Lenses, 5th ed. Edinburgh, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007; pp. 627–631.
  • Efron N. Clinical application of grading scales for contact lens complications. Optician. 1997;213:26–35.
  • Pérez-Cabré E, Millán MS, Abril HC, et al. Image analysis of contact lens grading scales for objective grade assignment of ocular complications. Proc of SPIE. 2005;5287:418–427.
  • Efron N, Morgan PB, Jagpal R. The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2003;23:79–85.
  • Efron N, Morgan PB, Farmer C, et al. Experience and training as determinants of grading reliability when assessing the severity of contact lens complications. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2003;23:119–124.
  • Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, et al. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:422–432.
  • Efron N, Morgan PG, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2001;21:17–29.
  • Welkowitz J, Ewen RB, Cohen J. Introductory Statistics for Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982; p. 251.
  • ISO, 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 1994.
  • Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976;2:75–84.
  • Efron N, McCubbin S. Grading contact lens complications under time constraints. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:1082–1086.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.