A Comparison between Subjective Refraction and Aberrometry-Derived Refraction in Keratoconus Patients and Control Subjects

REFERENCES

• Liang J, Williams DR. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997;14:2873–2883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, et al. Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:2329–2348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, et al. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:329–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, et al. Metrics of optical quality of the eye. J Vis. 2004;4:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004;4:322–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guirao A, Williams DR. A method to predict refractive errors from wave aberration data. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Thibos L, Bradley A. Estimating visual quality from wavefront aberration measurements. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S579–S584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. J Vis. 2004;4:310–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Marcos S. Aberrometry: The past, present, and future of optometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Hong X. Clinical applications of the Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:817–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Himebaugh N, Kollbaum PS, et al. Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:587–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Applegate RA.Assessment of optical quality. In: RR Krueger, RA Applegate, S MacRae (Eds.). Customized Corneal Ablation—The Quest for SuperVision. Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack Inc., 2001; pp. 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hong X, Thibos LN, Bradley A, et al. Comparison of monochromatic ocular aberrations measured with an objective cross-cylinder aberroscope and a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Opt Vis Sci. 2003;80:15–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon TO, van de Pol C. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia. Optometry. 2005;76:461–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirshahi A, Bühren J, Gerhardt D, et al. In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Cat Ref Surg. 2003;29:2295–2301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro R. Objective refraction from aberrometry: theory. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14:02402101–02402111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alio J, Shabayek M. Corneal higher order aberrations: A method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:539–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim L, Wei R, Tan D, et al. Evaluation of higher order ocular aberrations in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:825–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda N, Fujikado T, Kuroda T, et al. Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmol. 2002;109:1996–2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobbe M, Guillon M. Corneal wavefront aberration measurements to detect keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2005;28:57–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbero S, Marcos S, Merayo-Lloves J, et al. Validation of the estimation of corneal aberrations from videokeratography in keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwiegerling J, Greivenkamp JE. Keratoconus detection based on videokeratoscopic height data. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:721–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühren J, Kühne C, Kohnen T. Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantanelli S, MacRae S, Jeong TM, et al. Characterizing the wave aberration in eyes with keratoconus or penetrating keratoplasty using a high–dynamic range wavefront sensor. Ophthalmol. 2007;114:2013–2021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negishi K, Kumanomido T, Utsumi Y, et al. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:924–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinabhai A, Radhakrishnan H, O’Donnell C. Higher order aberrations in keratoconus: A review. Optom Pract. 2009;10:141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Jinabhai A, O’Donnell C. Dynamics of ocular aberrations in keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2010;93:164–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadnik K, Barr JT, Gordon MO, et al. Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. Cornea. 1996;15:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisch IM. Clinical Refraction. Chicago: The Professional Press, Inc., 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: An application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Grimm B, Golez S, et al. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994;11:1949–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda M, O’Donnell C, Radhakrishnan H. Repeatability of corneal and ocular aberration measurements and changes in aberrations over one week. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92:253–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies N, Diaz-Santana L, Lara-Saucedo D. Repeatability of ocular wavefront measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:142–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer H, Artal P, Singer B, et al. Dynamics of the eye’s wave aberration. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2001;18:497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Himebaugh N, Kollbaum PS, et al. Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:351–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron S, Efron N, Morgan P. Repeatability and reliability of ocular aberration measurements in contact lens wear. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2008;31:81–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navarro R, Losada MA. Aberrations and relative efficiency of light pencils in the living human eye. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:540–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN. Understanding ocular wavefront aberration: Part 2. The Optician. 2005;230:18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hong X, Thibos LN, Bradley A et al. Comparison of Monochromatic Ocular Aberrations Measured with an Objective Cross-Cylinder Aberroscope and a Shack-Hartmann Aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:15–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollbaum PS, Bradley A.Correcting aberrations with contact lenses. Part 2. Cont Lens Spectr. 2007;Dec:31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Zernike polynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant corneal aberrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4676–4681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho LA. Accuracy of Zernike polynomials in characterizing optical aberrations and the corneal surface of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1915–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate RA, Ballentine C, Gross H, et al. Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto C, Okamoto F, Oshika T, et al. Higher-order wavefront aberration and letter-contrast sensitivity in keratoconus. Eye. 2008;22:1488–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar