Comparison of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral vs. Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

REFERENCES

• Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe GJ, Caprioli J. Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:156–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield DS, Weinreb RN. Role of optic nerve imaging in glaucoma clinical practice and clinical trials. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:598–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassif N, Cense B, Park BH, et al. In vivo human retinal imaging by ultrahigh-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett. 2004;29:480–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtkowski M, Bajraszewski T, Gorczyńska I, et al. Ophthalmic imaging by spectral optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:412–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TC, Cense B, Pierce MC, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: Ultra-high speed, ultra-high resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1715–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehi M, Greenfield DS. Assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer using optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:1056–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Miglior S, Riva I, Guareschi M, et al. Retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:733–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliara MM, Lepore D, Balestrazzi E. The role of OCT in glaucoma management. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Chang RT, Knight OJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2294–2299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight OJ, Chang RT, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1271–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizzeri G, Weinreb RN, Gonzalez-Garcia AO, et al. Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:775–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Ahn H, Ha SJ, et al. Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Moon JW, Ha SJ, et al. Evaluation of a new scoring system for retinal nerve fiber layer photography using HRA1 in 964 eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007;21:216–221.
   Google Scholar
• Lee BL, Bathija R, Weinreb RN. The definition of normal-tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:366–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:661–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner H, Kliebsch U. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology. 1996;7:199–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludbrook J. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: A critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002;29:527–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Montañés J, Olmo N, Alvarez A, et al. Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography compared with stratus optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:335–343.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung CY, Leung CK, Lin D, et al. Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and signal strength in optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1347–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Huang J, Dustin L, et al. Signal strength is an important determinant of accuracy of nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:213–216.
   Google Scholar