Surgically Induced Changes in Corneal Viscoelastic Properties After 23-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy Using Ocular Response Analyzer

REFERENCES

• Eckardt C. Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2005;25:208–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine HF, Iranmanesh R, Iturralde D, Spaide RF. Outcomes of 77 consecutive cases of 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1197–1200.
   Google Scholar
• Lott MN, Manning MH, Singh J, Zhang H, Singh H, Marcus DM. 23-gauge vitrectomy in 100 eyes: short-term visual outcomes and complications. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2008;28:1193–1200.
   Google Scholar
• Warrier SK, Jain R, Gilhotra JS, Newland HS. Sutureless vitrectomy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:453–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson JT. Advantages and limitations of small gauge vitrectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 2011;56:162–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:257–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanidou V, Hamard P, Gendron G et al. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma 2010;19:252–256.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Labbé A, Raphael M, Baudouin C. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1371–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager A, Loge K, Füllhas MO, Schroeder B, Grossherr M, Wiegand W. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:341–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager A, Loge K, Kutschan A, Wiegand W. [The effect of cataract and vitreoretinal surgery on central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2008;225:207–211.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3026–3031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O’Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol 2008;86:215–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Agdeppa MC, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Amparo F, Piñero DP. Factors influencing corneal biomechanical changes after microincision cataract surgery and standard coaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:890–897.
   Google Scholar
• Kucumen RB, Yenerel NM, Gorgun E, Kulacoglu DN, Oncel B, Kohen MC et al. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:2096–2098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirneiss C, Neubauer AS, Yu A, Kampik A, Kernt M. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:e189–e192.
   Google Scholar
• Spörl E, Terai N, Haustein M, Böhm AG, Raiskup-Wolf F, Pillunat LE. [Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes]. Ophthalmologe 2009;106:512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ Jr. Hysteresis: new mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1499–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann MT, Koch DD, Zeiter JH. The effect of scleral cautery on corneal astigmatism in cadaver eyes. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19:259–262.
   Google Scholar
• Wirbelauer C, Hoerauf H, Roider J, Laqua H. Corneal shape changes after pars plana vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:822–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol 2007; 52:109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Mee M, Lewis SE, Pensyl D, Gerhardt G, Halverson KD, Qualls C. Factors Influencing Intermethod Agreement Between Goldmann Applanation, Pascal Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometry. J Glaucoma 2012 Mar 7. [Epub ahead of print] (J Glaucoma 2012;00:000–000).
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:840–849.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CS, Mian SI, Moroi S, Epstein D, Izatt J, Afshari NA. Role of corneal elasticity in damping of intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:2540–2544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YK, Hyon JY, Woo SJ, Park KH, Yu YS, Chung H. Surgically induced astigmatism after 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Eye (Lond) 2010;24:799–804.
   Google Scholar