In Vivo Validation of the New Tonopen AVIA Tonometer using Manometers placed in the Anterior chamber and the Vitreous Cavity under Various Vitreous Conditions

References

• Bhartiya S, Bali SJ, James M, Panda A, Dada T. Test retest variability of TonoPen AVIA. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:129–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhartiya S, Bali SJ, Sharma R, Chaturvedi N, Dada T. Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry. Int Ophthalmol 2011;31:297–302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster PJ, Wong JS, Wong E, Chen FG, Machin D, Chew PTK. Accuracy of clinical estimates of intraocular pressure in Chinese eyes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1816–1821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLellan GJ, Kemmerling JP, Kiland JA. Validation of the TonoVet(R) rebound tonometer in normal and glaucomatous cats. Veterinary Ophthalmol 2013;16:111–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He L, Wendt M, Glasser A. Manipulation of intraocular pressure for studying the effects on accommodation. Exp Eye Res 2012;102:76–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chitnis G, Maleki T, Samuels B, Cantor L, Ziaie B. A Minimally Invasive Implantable Wireless Pressure Sensor for Continuous IOP Monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013;60:250--256
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Verdejo JL, Teus MA, Bolivar G. Simultaneous measurement of intraocular pressure in the anterior chamber and the vitreous cavity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2010;88:e265–e268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley JC, McCartney DL, Craenen GA. Continuous intraocular pressure recordings during lamellar microkeratotomy of enucleated human eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:869–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:34–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chihara E. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol 2008;53:203–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry – a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1287–1293
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaurasia SS, Gimeno FL, Tan K, Yu SJ, Tan DT, Beuerman RW, et al. In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4641–4645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernandez-Verdejo JL, Teus MA, Roman JM, Bolivar G. Porcine model to compare real-time intraocular pressure during LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:68–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdova MC, Ferrova K, Filous A, Oskorypova K, Lezatkova P, Sedlackova P [Correlation of intraocular pressure measured by applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry and TonoPen with central corneal thickness. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2011;67:154–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisenberg DL, Sherman BG, McKeown CA, Schuman JS. Tonometry in adults and children. A manometric evaluation of pneumatonometry, applanation, and TonoPen in vitro and in vivo. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1173–1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:85–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitsamer HA, Kiel JW, Harrison JM, Ransom NL, McKinnon SJ. Tonopen measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Exp Eye Res 2004;78:799–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenkummer HP, Kampik A, Thierfelder S. Experimental evaluation of in vitro stability of purified polydimethylsiloxanes (silicone oil) in viscosity ranges from 1000 to 5000 centistokes. Retina 1992;12:S28–S32
   Google Scholar
• Soheilian M, Peyman GA, Moritera T, Wafapoor H. Experimental retinal tolerance to very low viscosity silicone oil (100 cs) as a vitreous substitute compared to higher viscosity silicone oil (5000 cs). Int Ophthalmol 1995;19:57–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Locke JC, Morton WR. Further studies of the viscosity of aspirated human vitreous fluid: with special reference to its use in retinal detachment surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1965;63:129–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon O, Krishnamoorthy M, Cho YI, Sankovic JM, Banerjee RK. Effect of blood viscosity on oxygen transport in residual stenosed artery following angioplasty. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:011003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou CY, Jordan CA, Mcghee CNJ, Patel DV. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:412–418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosentreter A, Athanasopoulos A, Schild AM, Lappas A, Cursiefen C, Dietlein TS. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas. Cornea 2013;32:313–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol 1999;61:551–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield YS, Kaminski BM, Repka MX, Melia M. Comparison of Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometers for measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy children. J AAPOS 2012;16:242–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar