Flicker Defined Form Perimetry in Glaucoma Suspects with Normal Achromatic Visual Fields

References

• Furtado JM, Lansingh VC, Carter MJ, Milanese MF, Pena BN, Ghersi HA, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Latin America. Surv Ophthalmol 2012;57:149–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessen H, Genz J, Bertram B, Trautner C, Giani G, Zollner I, et al. Evidence for a considerable decrease in total and cause-specific incidences of blindness in Germany. Eur J Epidemiol 2012;27:519–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268–1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003;16:213–225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamparter J, Schulze A, Hoffmann EM. Frequency-doubling technology: a new method for determining glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmologe 2009;106:709–713
   Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:645–650
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossetti L, Fogagnolo P, Miglior S, Centofanti M, Vetrugno M, Orzalesi N. Learning effect of short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2006;15:399–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, et al. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:7325–7331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jampel HD, Singh K, Lin SC, Chen TC, Francis BA, Hodapp E, et al. Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2011;118:986–1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A, Neville S. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1569–1571
   Google Scholar
• Goren D, Flanagan JG. Is flicker-defined form (FDF) dependent on the contour? J Vis 2008;8:15.1–15.11
   Google Scholar
• Quaid PT, Flanagan JG. Defining the limits of flicker defined form: effect of stimulus size, eccentricity and number of random dots. Vision Res 2005;45:1075–1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannheim F. Flicker and conventional perimetry in comparison with structural changes in glaucoma. Ophthalmologe 2013;110:131–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamparter J, Schulze A, Schuff AC, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM. Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:1057–1064.e1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson WH, Sun H, Lee BB, Cao D. Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:764–771
   Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch ophthalmol 1996;114:19–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schimiti RB, Avelino RR, Kara-Jose N, Costa VP. Full-threshold versus Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) in normal individuals undergoing automated perimetry for the first time. Ophthalmology 2002;109:2084–2092 (discussion 2092)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamparter J, Russell RA, Schulze A, Schuff AC, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM. Structure–function relationship between FDF, FDT, SAP, and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7553–7559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:62–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Alanko HI. Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:206–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilforushan N, Nassiri N, Moghimi S, Law SK, Giaconi J, Coleman AL, et al. Structure–function relationships between spectral-domain OCT and standard achromatic perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:2740–2748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Lisboa R, Weinreb RN, Girkin CA, Liebmann JM, Zangwill LM. A combined index of structure and function for staging glaucomatous damage. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:E1–E10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1684–1689
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasler S, Sturmer J. First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter(R) on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2012;229:319–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RS, Redmond T, McDowell DR, Breslin KM, Zlatkova MB. The robustness of various forms of perimetry to different levels of induced intraocular stray light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4022–4028
   Google Scholar