Can the APO method be used for measuring soft data?: A pilot study

References

• Strandberg EL, Wilhelmsson S. “Utan helhetssyn ingen primärvård” [Without a holistic view no primary care] (in Swedish). Karlshamn: Blekinge FoU-enhet, Rapport 2004:1, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg EL, Ovhed I, Borgquist L, Wilhelmsson S. The perceived meaning of a (w)holistic view among general practitioners and district nurses in Swedish primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentzen N. Medical audit: The APO method in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 1993;11(Suppl 1):13–8.
   Google Scholar
• Munck AP, Hansen DG, Lindman A, Ovhed I, Førre S, Thorsteinsson JB. A Nordic collaboration on medical audit: The APO method for quality development and continuous medical education (CME) in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 1998;16:2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard J, Hansen DG, Aarslev P, Munck AP. A multifaceted intervention according to the Audit Project Odense method improved secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease: A randomised controlled trial. Fam Pract 2006;23:198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon MG. Medical audit in general practice. Occasional Paper 20. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Crombie D, Fleming D. Practice activity analysis. Occasional Paper 41. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Pörn I. Filosofi – visdom för vår tid? [Philosophy – wisdom for out time] (in Swedish). In Venkula J, editor. Ajatuksen Voima [The power of thought]. Jyväskylä: Edistyksellinen tiedeliitto; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen CN, Hansen DG, Kragstrup J, Busch O, Munck A. The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice: The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle. Qual Prim Care 2003;1:225–32.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg EL, Ovhed I, Håkansson A, Troein M. The meaning of quality work from the general practitioner's perspective: An interview study. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melander E, Björgell A, Björgell P, Ovhed I, Mölstad S. Medical audit changes physicians’ prescribing of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. Scand J Prim Health Care 1999;17:180–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck A, Damsgaard J, Hansen DG, Bjerrum L, Søndergaard J. The Nordic method for quality improvement in general practice. Qual Prim Care 2003;1:73–8.
   Google Scholar
• Munck AP, Gahrn-Hansen B, Søgaard P, Søgaard J. Long-lasting improvement in general practitioners’ prescribing of antibiotics by means of medical audit. Scand J Prim Health Care 1999;17:185–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard J, Hansen DG, Aarslev P, Munck AP. A multifaceted intervention according to the Audit Project Odense method improved secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease: A randomised controlled trial. Fam Pract 2006;23:1998–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. Konsultationen – kommunikation mellan läkare och patient (The consultation: An approach to learning and teaching). Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wulff HR, Götzsche PC. Den kliniska beslutsprocessen [The clinical decision-making process] (in Swedish). Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Armson H, Kinzie S, Hawes D, Roder S, Wakefield J, Elmslie T. Translating learning into practice: Lessons from the practice-based small group learning program. Can Fam Phys 2007;53:1477–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson G, Mattsson B. Experiences of small CME group work in general practice in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care 1999;17:196–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Key questions: A strategy for modifying clinical communication. Transforming tacit skills into a clinical method. Scand J Prim Health Care 1994;12:121–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malterud K, Hollnagel H. Key questions in consultation – a clinical communication method (in Danish). Ugeskr Læger 2004;166:2034–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Undeland M, Malterud K. Diagnostic interaction: The patient as a source of knowledge? A qualitative case study from general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care, 2008; 26:222–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøgelund Frederiksen H, Elverdam B. FynPEP – Praktiserende læger og deres patienters kvalitetskriterier i hverdagen og deres erfaringer med at deltage i DanPEP [FynPEP – General practitioners and their patients’ every day quality criteria and their experience of participating in DanPEP. The quality development board, County of Funen.] (in Danish). Kvalitetsudviklingsvalget, Fyns Amt, April 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Cawston PG, Bikker AP. Quality in general practice consultations; A qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie B, Wyke S. Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: A qualitative study of general practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridd M, Shaw A, Salisbury C. “Two sides of the coin” – the value of personal continuity to GPs: A qualitative interview study. Fam Pract 2006;23:461–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. London: Pitman; 1957.
   Google Scholar
• WONCA Europe. The European definition of general practice/family medicine. 2005. Available online at: http://www.woncaeurope.org/Definition%20GP–FM.htm
   Google Scholar
• Johansen M-L, Holtedahl KA, Rudebeck CE. A doctor close at hand: How GPs view their role in cancer care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2010;28:249–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar