Distance to hospital and socioeconomic status influence secondary health care use

References

• Zielinski A, Hakansson A, Jurgutis A, Ovhed I, Halling A. Differences in referral rates to specialised health care from four primary health care models in Klaipeda, Lithuania. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starfield B, Lemke KW, Herbert R, Pavlovich WD, Anderson G. Comorbidity and the use of primary care and specialist care in the elderly. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:215–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2269–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan CO, Omar RZ, Ambler G, Majeed A. Case-mix and variation in specialist referrals in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:529–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindström K, Engström S, Bengtsson C, Borgquist L. Determinants of hospitalisation rates: Does primary health care play a role?Scand J Prim Health Care 2003;21:15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVela SL, Smith B, Weaver FM, Miskevics SA. Geographical proximity and health care utilization in veterans with SCI & D in the USA.Soc Sci Med 2004;59:2387–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalstra JA, Kunst AE, Borrell C, Breeze E, Cambois E, Costa G, et al. Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: An overview of eight European countries. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:316–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirehn AB, Ostgren CJ, Carstensen JM. Age and gender differences in the impact of diabetes on the prevalence of ischemic heart disease: A population-based register study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008;79:497–502.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johns Hopkins University. The Johns Hopkins ACG System. About the ACG System. Available at: http://www.acg.jhsph.org/index.php?option = com_content&view = article&id = 55&Itemid = 149 [cited 16 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Orueta JF, Lopez-De-Munain J, Baez K, Aiarzaguena JM, Aranguren JI, Pedrero E. Application of the ambulatory care groups in the primary care of a European national health care system: Does it work?Med Care 1999;37:238–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiner JP, Starfield BH, Steinwachs DM, Mumford LM. Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix. Med Care 1991;29:452–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starfield B, Weiner J, Mumford L, Steinwachs D. Ambulatory care groups: A categorization of diagnoses for research and management. Health Serv Res 1991;26:53–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halling A, Fridh G, Ovhed I. Validating the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System of the elderly in Swedish primary health care. BMC Public Health 2006;6:171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engstrom SG, Carlsson L, Ostgren CJ, Nilsson GH, Borgquist LA. The importance of comorbidity in analysing patient costs in Swedish primary care. BMC Public Health 2006;6:36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mwalili SM, Lesaffre E, Declerck D. The zero-inflated negative binomial regression model with correction for misclassification: An example in caries research. Stat Methods Med Res 2008;17:123–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uijen AA, van de Lisdonk EH. Multimorbidity in primary care: Prevalence and trend over the last 20 years. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14:28–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: A retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61: 12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber Y, Weston SA, Killian JM, Therneau TM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL. Neighborhood income and individual education: Effect on survival after myocardial infarction. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:663–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson L, Strender LE, Fridh G, Nilsson GH. Clinical categories of patients and encounter rates in primary health care: A three-year study in defined populations. BMC Public Health 2006;6:35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee WC. Quantifying morbidities by Adjusted Clinical Group system for a Taiwan population: A nationwide analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson L, Strender LE, Fridh G, Nilsson G. Types of morbidity and categories of patients in a Swedish county: Applying the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups System to encounter data in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004;22:174–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazier RH, Agha MM, Moineddin R, Sibley LM. Universal health insurance and equity in primary care and specialist office visits: A population-based study. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7:396–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koller D, Eisele M, Kaduszkiewicz H, Schon G, Steinmann S, Wiese B, et al. Ambulatory health services utilization in patients with dementia: Is there an urban–rural difference?Int J Health Geogr 2010;9:59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langley GR, Minkin S, Till JE. Regional variation in nonmedical factors affecting family physicians’ decisions about referral for consultation. CMAJ 1997;157:265–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Droomers M, Westert GP. Do lower socioeconomic groups use more health services, because they suffer from more illnesses?Eur J Public Health 2004;14:311–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabenkin H, Gross R, Brammli S, Shvartzman P. Patients’ views of direct access to specialists: An Israeli experience. JAMA 1998;279:1943–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habicht J, Kiivet R-A, Habicht T, Kunst AE. Social inequalities in the use of health care services after 8 years of health care reforms: A comparative study of the Baltic countries. Int J Public Health 2009;54:250–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar