Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon: Assessment with Indirect Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in 67 Patients with Arthroscopic Correlation

References

• Resnick D. Shoulder pain. Orthop Clin North Am 1983; 14: 81–97
   Google Scholar
• Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, Levy BA, Marx RG. Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 455: 52–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees JL. The pathogenesis and surgical treatment of tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 7: 827–32
   Google Scholar
• Matava MJ, Purcell DB, Rudzki JR. Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 1405–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldt S, Bruegel M, Mueller D, Holzapfel K, Imhoff AB, Rummeny EJ, et al. Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 491–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balich SM, Sheley RC, Brown TR, Sauser DD, Quinn SF. MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. Radiology 1997; 204: 191–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, Cervilla V, Karzel RP, Schweitzer ME, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Radiology 1992; 182: 431–6
   Google Scholar
• Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasound of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one-hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 498–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yagci B, Manisali M, Yilmaz E, Ozkan M, Ekin A, Ozaksoy D, et al. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder in detection of rotator cuff ruptures. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 258–62
   Google Scholar
• Meister K, Thesing J, Montgomery WJ, Indelicato PA, Walczak S, Fontenot W. MR arthrography of partial-thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33: 136–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodler J. Technical errors in MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 9–18
   Google Scholar
• Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. MR arthrography. Radiographics 2002; 22: 1223–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahlensieck M, Sommer T, Textor J, Pauleit D, Lang P, Genant HK, et al. Indirect MR arthrography: techniques and applications. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 232–5
   Google Scholar
• Shahabpour M, Kichouh M, Laridon E, Gielen JL, De Mey J. The effectiveness of diagnostic imaging methods for the assessment of soft tissue and articular disorders of the shoulder and elbow. Eur J Radiol 2008; 65: 194–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Holsbeeck MT, Kolowich PA, Eyler WR, Craig JG, Shirazi KK, Habra GK, et al. Ultrasonographic depiction of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Radiology 1995; 197: 443–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotiadou AN, Vlychou M, Papadopoulos P, Karataglis DS, Palladas P, Fezoulidis IV. Ultrasonography of symptomatic rotator cuff tears compared with MR imaging and surgery. Eur J Radiol 2008; 68: 174–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold T, Bachthaler M, Hamer OW, Hente R, Feuerbach S, Fellner C, et al. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder: use of abduction and external rotation to detect full- and partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon. Radiology 2006; 240: 152–60
   Google Scholar
• Snyder SJ, Pachelli AF, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD, Pattee G. Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy 1991; 7: 1–7
   Google Scholar
• Robertson PL, Schweitzer ME, Mitchell DG, Schlesinger F, Epstein RE, Frieman BG, et al. Rotator cuff disorders: interobserver and intraobserver variation in diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194: 831–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vahlensieck M, Peterfy CG, Wischer T, Sommer T, Lang P, Schlippert U, et al. Indirect MR arthrography: optimization and clinical applications. Radiology 1996; 200: 249–54
   Google Scholar