Cardiac output measured by electrical velocimetry in the CT suite correlates with coronary artery enhancement: a feasibility study

References

• McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, Lameire N, Stacul F, . Risk prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:27K–36K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl 2006;69:S11–S15.
   Google Scholar
• Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B, Hamm LL, . Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2003;108:2154–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae KT, Heiken JP. Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT. Eur Radiol 2005;15(Suppl 5):E46–E59.
   Google Scholar
• Kormano M, Partanen K, Soimakallio S, Kivimaki T. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. Invest Radiol 1983;18:364–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann D. Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 2003;13(Suppl 5):M14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology 2004;230:142–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Hennemuth A, Jung B, Koos R, Wildberger JE, . Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2498–504.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Rauscher A, Klotz E, Muhlenbruch G, Das M, Gunther RW, . Quantitative prediction of contrast enhancement from test bolus data in cardiac MSCT. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1310–19.
   Google Scholar
• Husmann L, Alkadhi H, Boehm T, Leschka S, Schepis T, Koepfli P, . Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1111–16.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt C, Theilmeier G, Van Aken H, Korsmeier P, Wirtz SP, Berendes E, . Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:603–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suttner S, Schollhorn T, Boldt J, Mayer J, Rohm KD, Lang K, . Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:2053–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zoremba N, Bickenbach J, Krauss B, Rossaint R, Kuhlen R, Schalte G. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:1314–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osypka MJ, Bernstein DP. Electrophysiologic principles and theory of stroke volume determination by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. AACN Clin Issues 1999;10: 385–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernstein DP, Osypka MJ. Apparatus and method for determining an approximation of the stroke volume and cardiac output of the hearts. US Patent 6,511,438 B2, January 28, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, Mount BE, Dalton ML. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest 2003;123:2028–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 1998; 207:657–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansson M, Holmquist F, Nyman U. Ultralow contrast medium doses at CT to diagnose pulmonary embolism in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. A feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1321–30.
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff JA, Tauxe WN, Kiely JM, Stroebel CF. Erythrocyte volume, plasma volume, and lean body mass in adult men and women. Blood 1969;33:649–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model. Radiology 1998;207:647–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bae KT, Seeck BA, Hildebolt CF, Tao C, Zhu Kanematsu M, . Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190: 777–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15: 85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-analysis of published studies concerning the validity of thoracic impedance cardiography. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;873:121–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Milo O, Vered Z, Cotter G. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance: comparison with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications. Curr Opin Cardiol 2004;19:229–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout CL, Van de Water JM, Thompson WM, Bowers EW, Sheppard SW, Tewari AM, . Impedance cardiography: can it replace thermodilution and the pulmonary artery catheter? Am Surg 2006;72:728–32; discussion 33–4.
   Google Scholar