Impact on image quality and radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography: 100 kVp versus 120 kVp

References

• Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, . Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging. A Science Advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009;119: 1056–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007; 298:317–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, . Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301:500–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin JG, Greenland P, . Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography – a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114:1761–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging – A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H. Radiation dose of cardiac CT – what is the evidence? Eur Radiol 2009;19:1311–15.
   Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ. Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:279–87.
   Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Budoff MJ. A new method to reduce radiation exposure during multi-row detector cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiol 2009;132:435–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, . Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice – impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113:1305–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earls JP, Schrack EC. Prospectively gated low-dose CCTA: 24 months experience in more than 2,000 clinical cases. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:177–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh J, Londt J, Vass M, Li J, Tang XY, Okerlund D. Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 2006;33:4236–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, . Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohl C, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, Leidecker C, Suss C, Schmidt T, . Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1841–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel HD, Galanski M, Hidajar N, Maier W, Schmidt T. Radiation exposure in computed tomography. Fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimization, scanner data, terminology. Hamburg: CTB Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF. Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 2004;231:169–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kalender WA, Deak P, Kellermeier M, van Straten M, Vollmar SV. Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. Med Phys 2009;36: 993–1007.
   Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Mao SS, Karlsberg D, Young E, Waggoner J, Ahmadi N, . Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:405–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, . Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1809–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D, Bachmann S, Marwan M, Daniel WG, . Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1045–50.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Committee on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 26. Ann ICRP 1977:1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman U, Björk J, Sterner G, Bäck SE, Carlson J, Lindström V, . Standardization of p-creatinine assays and use of lean body mass allow improved prediction of calculated glomerular filtration rate in adults: a new equation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2006;66:451–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson A, Ripsweden J, Rück A, Aspelin P, Cederlund K, Brismar TB. Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media. Acta Radiol 2010 Jun 23 [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Fayad ZA, Poon M, Taylor AJ, . Task force 13: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (computed tomography) endorsed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:409–14.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas JD, Zoghbi WA, Beller GA, Bonow RO, Budoff MJ, Cerqueira MD, . ACCF 2008 Training Statement on Multimodality Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:125–46.
   Google Scholar
• Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Strote JN, Warren BH, . Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1662–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, . A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 2008; 248:995–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. Sixth. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. Third. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, Wilde P, Oberhoff M, Karsch KR, . Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1840–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedetti G, Pizzi C, Gavaruzzi G, Lugaresi F, Cicognani A, Picano E. Suboptimal awareness of radiologic dose among patients undergoing cardiac stress scintigraphy. J Am Coll Radiol 2008;5:126–31.
   Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Knez A, Becker C, Becker A, White C, Thilo C, . Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography. Heart 2003;89:633–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaca M, Kirilmaz A, Oncel G, Oncel D, Yilmaz H, Tamci B, . Contrast-enhanced 64-slice computed tomography in detection and evaluation of anomalous coronary arteries. Tohoku J Exp Med 2007;213:249–59.
   Google Scholar
• von Ziegler F. Detektion, Quantifizierung und morphologische charakterisierung atherosklerotischer läsionen der koronargefäße mit der kardialen mehrschicht-spiral- computertomographie. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, dissertation; 2007. Available at: http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/7012/1/Ziegler_Franz_von.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holmquist F, Hansson K, Pasquariello F, Bjork J, Nyman U. Minimizing contrast medium doses to diagnose pulmonary embolism with 80-kVp multidetector computed tomography in azotemic patients. Acta Radiol 2009;50:181–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel H, Schibilla H, Teunen D. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, publication no. EUR 16262 EN, 2000, European Commission, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar