Clinico-radio-pathologic features of a solitary solid renal mass at MDCT examination

References

• Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol 1999;162:1930–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank I, Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H. Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort. J Urol 2005;173:1889–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patard JJ, Rodriguez A, Rioux-Leclercq N, Guille F, Lobel B. Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours. BJU Int 2002;90:358–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie JP. Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 2008;249:16–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalrymple NC, Prasad SR, El-Merhi FM, Chintapalli KN. Price of isotropy in multidetector CT. Radiographics 2007;27:49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003;170:2217–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. Sixth. New York: Springer; 2002. 323–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lohse CM, Blute ML, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Cheville JC. Comparison of standardized and nonstandardized nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma to predict outcome among 2,042 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118:877–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretheau D, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Grisoni V, Coulange C. Prognostic significance of incidental renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 1995;27:319–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayson M, Sanders H. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1998;51:203–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:612–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosniak MA, Rofsky NM. Problems in the detection and characterization of small renal masses. Radiology 1996;198:638–41.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum BA, Hindman N, Lee J, Babb JS. Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: influence of multidetector CT reconstruction algorithm and scanner type in phantom model. Radiology 2007;244:767–75.
   Google Scholar
• Wang ZJ, Coakley FV, Fu Y, Joe BN, Prevrhal S, Landeras LA, . Renal cyst pseudoenhancement at multidetector CT: what are the effects of number of detectors and peak tube voltage? Radiology 2008;248:910–16.
   Google Scholar
• Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 2005;236:441–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ, King BF, LeRoy AJ, Farrow GM, . Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 2003;169:71–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006;240:6–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld AJ, Guru K, Fuchs GJ, Kim HL. Percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma underestimates nuclear grade. Urology 2010 Feb 15 [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, Napoli A, Pediconi F, Danti M, . High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1271–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkvatan A, Akdur PO, Altinel M, Olcer T, Turhan N, Cumhur T, . Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma with multidetector CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 2009;15:22–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JI, Cho JY, Moon KC, Lee HJ, Kim SH. Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma. Radiology 2009;252:441–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Tanimoto A, Shinmoto H, Kuribayashi S. Angiomyolipomas that do not contain fat attenuation at unenhanced CT. Radiology 2005;234:311; author reply, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Catalano OA, Samir AE, Sahani DV, Hahn PF. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Radiology 2008;247:738–46.
   Google Scholar