Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms

References

• Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, . Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists’ characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology 2009;253:641–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gur D, Stalder J, Hardesty L, Zheng B, Sumkin J, Chough D, . Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology 2004; 233:418–23.
   Google Scholar
• Helvie M, Hadjiiski L, Makariou E, Chan H, Petrick N, Shainer B, . Sensitivity of non commercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology 2004;231:208–14.
   Google Scholar
• Birdwell R, Ikeda MD, O'Shaughnessy K, Sickles E. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided-detection. Radiology 2001;219:192–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean JC, Ilvento C. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:20–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ko J, Nicholas M, Mendel J, Slanetz P. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1483–91.
   Google Scholar
• Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino R. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188: 377–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:337–40.
   Google Scholar
• Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol 2002;12:3015–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology 2008;246:71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, . Screening mammography detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 2007;244:104–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Assessing the fit of the model. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 1989. 135–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Radiology 2006;241:695–701.
   Google Scholar
• Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Pfleiderer SO, . Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003;228:851–6.
   Google Scholar
• Obenauer S, Sohns CH, Werner C, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories. Breast J 2006;12:16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sadaf A, Crystal P, Scaranelo A, Helbich T. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 2009 Oct 27 [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Hoffmeister JW, DeSimio MP. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 2005;104:931–5.
   Google Scholar
• Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Zisman G, DeSimio MP, Rogers SK. A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:893–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Mohtashemi K, Jindal G, . Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:439–44.
   Google Scholar
• Malich A, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Pfleiderer SO, Fleck M, . Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 2001;11:2454–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malich A, Fischer DR, Facius M, Petrovitch A, Boettcher J, Marx C, . Effect of breast density on computer aided detection. J Digit Imaging 2005;18:227–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ho WT, Lam PWT. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clinical Radiology 2003;58:133–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda D, Birdwell R, O'Shaughnessy K, Sickles E, Brenner J. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology 2004;230:811–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelson EB, Harris KM, Doshi N, Tobon H. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma: mammographic patterns with pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:265–71.
   Google Scholar
• Evans WP, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O'Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2002;225:182–9.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson I, Hildrell I, Muhlow A, Pettersson H. Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease. Am J Roentgenol 1978;130:349–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linnell FS. Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 1991;178:149–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Boggis CR, McGee MA, Griffiths PM, Duffy SW, . Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R72. Epub Aug 25 [available online at: http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/10/4/R72].
   Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Moon WK, Seong MH, Cho N, Chang JM. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms. Acta Radiol 2009;50:999–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng B, Chang YH, Good WF, Gur D. Softcopy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001;221:633–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Moon WK, Kim SY, Chang JM, Kim SM, Cho N. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer. Acta Radiol 2010;51:482–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar