The IAEA/WHO TL Dosimetry Service for Radiotherapy Centres 1969–1987

References

• Eisenlohr H H, Jayaraman S. IAEA-WHO cobalt-60 teletherapy dosimetry service using mailed LiF dosemeters. A survey of results obtained during 1970–75. Phys Med Biol 1977; 22: 18–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd A W, Eisenlohr H H, Girzikowsky R. Postal dose inter-comparison of 60Co dosimetry using thermoluminescence dosimeters among secondary standard dosimetry laboratories. Med Phys 1982; 9: 112–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjärngard B E, Kase K R. Postal intercomparison of absorbed dose for high energy x-rays with thermoluminescence dosimeters. Med Phys 1980; 7: 560–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Comité Consultatif pour les Etalons de Mesure des Rayonnements Ionisants (Section I). Report to the Comité International des Poids et Mesures (Ellis SC, reporter). 8th meeting. 1985
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams. An international code of practice. IAEA, Vienna 1987
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson O. Comparison of different protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Radiother Oncol 1985; 4: 313–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gustafsson M, Girzikowsky R, Bera P. The IAEA/WHO postal dose intercomparison for radiation therapy. Dosimetry in radiotherapy. Proc. Symp. Vienna, 1988. IAEA, Vienna 1988; 172, 2
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson G. Control of the Swedish standard at exposition at ⁶⁰Co. Statens Strålskyddsinstitut, (In Swedish), Stockholm 1970
   Google Scholar
• Svensson H. Dosimetric measurements at the nordic medical accelerators. II. Absorbed dose measurements. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol 1971; 10: 631–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K A, Mattsson L O, Svensson H. Dosimetric intercomparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. 1. Absorbed dose intercomparison. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol 1982; 21: 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Wittkaemper F W, Mijnheer B J, Van Kleffens H J. Dose intercomparison at the radiotherapy centres in the Netherlands. I. Photon beams under reference conditions and for prostatic cancer treatment. Radiother Oncol 1987; 9: 33–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ICRU. Report 24. Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by means of X or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures. International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements, Washington DCUSA 1976, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, 20014
   Google Scholar
• Accuracy requirements and quality assurance of external beam therapy with photons and electrons. Acta Oncol 1988; 27(Suppl. 1), Brahme, A ed.
   Google Scholar
• Thames H D, Jr, Peters L J, Spanos W, Fletcher G F. Dose response of squamous cell carcinomas of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Br J Cancer 1980; 41(Suppl. 4)35–8
   Google Scholar
• Bataini J P, Bernier J, Jaulerry C, Brunin F. Time/dose relationships and local control of oro and hypopharyngeal cancer treated by radiotherapy. Progress in radio-oncology II, K H Karcher, H D Kogelnik, G Reinartz. Raven Press, New York 1982; 331–7
   Google Scholar
• Mijnheer B J, Battermann J J, Wambersie A. What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy. Radiother Oncol 1987; 8: 237–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarls R. Rapport du groupe de travail sur l'expression des incertitudes au CIPM. BIPM Proc. Verb. Com. Int. Poids et Mesures 1981; 49, Annexe A
   Google Scholar
• Johansson K A, Hanson W F, Horiot J C. Workship of the EORTC radiotherapy group on quality assurance in cooperative trials of radiotherapy: A recommendation for EORTC cooperative groups. Radiother Oncol 1988; 11: 201–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K A, Horiot J C, Van Dam J, Lepinoy D, Sentenac I, Sernbo G. Quality assurance control in the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy. 2. Dosimetric intercomparison. Radiother Oncol 1986; 7: 269–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar