1,191
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A complex intervention to enhance the involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial and feasibility study of a multimodal intervention

, , , , &
Pages 299-306 | Received 17 Aug 2010, Accepted 15 Oct 2010, Published online: 13 Jan 2011

References

  • Mikkelsen TH, Sondergaard J, Jensen AB, Olesen F. Cancer rehabilitation: Psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:216–21.
  • Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC: Comittee on Cancer Survivorship. Improving Care and Quality of Life, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council; 2006.
  • Groenvold M, Pedersen C, Jensen CR, Faber MT, Johnsen AT. The cancer patient's world: A study of what Danish cancer patients need – results, assessments and proposals. Research Unit, Palliative Medical Department, H:S/Bispebjerg Hospital, 2006. Danish.
  • Schmid-Buchi S, Halfens RJ, Dassen T, van den Borne B. Psychosocial problems and needs of posttreatment patients with breast cancer and their relatives. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2010. Epub Jan 18.
  • Ronson A, Body JJ. Psychosocial rehabilitation of cancer patients after curative therapy. Support Care Cancer 2002; 10:281–91.
  • Earle CC. Failing to plan is planning to fail: Improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5112–6.
  • Gilbert SM, Miller DC, Hollenbeck BK, Montie JE, Wei JT. Cancer survivorship: Challenges and changing paradigms. J Urol 2008;179:431–8.
  • Houlihan NG. Transitioning to cancer survivorship: Plans of care. Oncology (Williston Park) 2009;23(8 Suppl):42–8.
  • Smith SM, Allwright S, O'Dowd T. Does sharing care across the primary-specialty interface improve outcomes in chronic disease? A systematic review. Am J Manag Care 2008;14:213–24.
  • Nielsen JD, Palshof T, Mainz J, Jensen AB, Olesen F. Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: Bridging the gap between general practice and hospital. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12:263–72.
  • Grunfeld E. Primary care physicians and oncologists are players on the same team. J Clin Oncol 2008;26: 2246–7.
  • Grunfeld E. Cancer survivorship: A challenge for primary care physicians. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:741–2.
  • Johansson B, Berglund G, Hoffman K, Glimelius B, Sjoden PO. The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routine. Scand J Prim Health Care 2000;18:143–8.
  • Kendall M, Boyd K, Campbell C, Cormie P, Fife S, Thomas K, . How do people with cancer wish to be cared for in primary care? Serial discussion groups of patients and carers. Fam Pract 2006;23:644–50.
  • Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H. “When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me” – the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:19.
  • Grunfeld E, Earle CC. The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: Treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010:25–30.
  • Bulsara C, Ward AM, Joske D. Patient perceptions of the GP role in cancer management. Aust Fam Physician 2005; 34:299–300, 302.
  • Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, . CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c869.
  • Information available at the homepage of the Region of Southern Denmark. Available from: www.regionsyddanmark.dk (In Danish).
  • PLO Praksistælling [General Practitioners’ Organisation Practice Count] Copenhagen, 2009. Available from: www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/P_L_O/Om%20PLO/Tal%20og%20publikationer/Statistik%20om%20almen%20praksis/praksist%C3%A6lling_2009.pdf (In Danish).
  • Mikkelsen T, Sondergaard J, Sokolowski I, Jensen A, Olesen F. Cancer survivors’ rehabilitation needs in a primary health care context. Fam Pract 2009;26:221–30.
  • Kurtz SM, Silverman JD. The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: An aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ 1996;30:83–9.
  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–76.
  • Groenvold M, Klee MC, Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK. Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50:441–50.
  • Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, Polland A, Dudley WN. A POMS short form for cancer patients: Psychometric and structural evaluation. Psychooncology 2002;11:273–81.
  • Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, Heje HN. Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:174–80.
  • Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr 1978;6:160–70.
  • Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy – Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med 2002;24:49–58.
  • Aranda S, Schofield P, Weih L, Milne D, Yates P, Faulkner R. Meeting the support and information needs of women with advanced breast cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2006;95:667–73.
  • Mikkelsen TH. PhD-thesis: Cancer rehabilitation in Denmark – with particular focus on the present and future role of general practice. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark, 2009. ISBN 978-87-90004-09-5.
  • Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, . Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321:694–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.