Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability

References

• Lin P, Koh ES, Lin M, Vinod SK, Ho-Shon I, Yap J, et al. Diagnostic and staging impact of radiotherapy planning FDG-PET-CT in non-small-cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011;101:284–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruysscher D, Nestle U, Jeraj R, Macmanus M. PET scans in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2012;75:141–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Elmpt W, Pottgen C, De Ruysscher D. Therapy response assessment in radiotherapy of lung cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;55:648–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thie J. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:1431–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elmpt W, Ollers M, Dingemans AM, Lambin P, De Ruysscher D. Response assessment using 18F-FDG PET early in the course of radiotherapy correlates with survival in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2012;53:1514–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda A, Yokosuka N, Ohashi T, Kunieda E, Fujii H, Aoki Y, et al. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET is a strong predictor of local recurrence for localized non-small-cell lung cancer after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Radiother Oncol 2011;101:291–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velazquez ER, Aerts HJ, Oberije C, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P. Prediction of residual metabolic activity after treatment in NSCLC patients. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1033–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya M, Creach KM, Frye J, Dehdashti F, Bradley JD, El Naqa I. Combined PET/CT image characteristics for radiotherapy tumor response in lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2012;102:239–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, Albarghach N, Pradier O, Metges JP, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med 2011;52:369–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Naqa I, Grigsby P, Apte A, Kidd E, Donnelly E, Khullar D, et al. Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes. Pattern Recognit 2009;42:1162–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckler AJ, Bresolin L, Dunnick NR, Sullivan DC. Quantitative imaging test approval and biomarker qualification: Interrelated but distinct activities. Radiology 2011;259:875–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin P, van Stiphout RG, Starmans MH, Rios-Velazquez E, Nalbantov G, Aerts HJ, et al. Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology – multifactorial decision support systems. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013;10:27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:441–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, et al. Radiomics: The process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1234–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Langen AJ, Vincent A, Velasquez LM, van Tinteren H, Boellaard R, Shankar LK, et al. Repeatability of 18F-FDG uptake measurements in tumors: A metaanalysis. J Nucl Med 2012;53:701–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tixier F, Hatt M, Le Rest CC, Le Pogam A, Corcos L, Visvikis D. Reproducibility of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization through textural feature analysis in 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2012;53:693–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galavis PE, Hollensen C, Jallow N, Paliwal B, Jeraj R. Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1012–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings V, de Langen AJ, Smit EF, van Velden FH, Hoekstra OS, van Tinteren H, et al. Repeatability of metabolically active volume measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1870–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheebsumon P, Boellaard R, de Ruysscher D, van Elmpt W, van Baardwijk A, Yaqub M, et al. Assessment of tumour size in PET/CT lung cancer studies: PET- and CT-based methods compared to pathology. EJNMMI Res 2012;2:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, Boersma L, Buijsen J, Wanders S, Hochstenbag M, et al. PET-CT-based auto- contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:771–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deasy JO, Blanco AI, Clark VH. CERR: A computational environment for radiotherapy research. Med Phys 2003;30:979–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features of image classification. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 1973; SMC-3:610–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway M. Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Comput Vision Graph 1975;4:172–9.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J, Altman D. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007;17:571–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar