Dosimetric verification of complex radiotherapy with a 3D optically based dosimetry system: Dose painting and target tracking

References

• Bentzen SM. Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: Dose-painting by numbers. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:112–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanderup K, Olsen DR, Grau C. Dose painting: Art or science. Radiother Oncol 2006;79:245–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts HJWL, Lambin P, De Ruysscher D. FDG for dose painting: A rational choice. Radiother Oncol 2010;97: 163–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korreman SS, Ulrich S, Bowen S, Deveau M, Bentzen SM, Jeraj R. Feasibility of dose painting using volumetric modulated arc optimization and delivery. Acta Oncol 2010;49:964–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani I, Duprez F, Botenberg T, Van de Wiele C, Bonte K, Deron P, et al. Maximum tolerated dose in a phase I trial on adaptive dose painting by numbers for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011;101:351–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer G, Steenhuijsen J, Bal M, De Jaeger K, Schuring D, Theuws J. Dose painting by contours versus dose painting by numbers for stage II/III lung cancer: Practical implications of using a broad or sharp brush. Radiother Oncol 2011;100:396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsman MR, Mortensen LS, Petersen JBB, Busk M, Overgaard J. Hypoxia imaging for improving radiotherapy outcome. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;9:674–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma-Dasu I, Uhrdin J, Antonovic L, Dasu A, Nuyts S, Dirix P, et al. Dose prescription and treatment planning based on FMISO-PET hypoxia. Acta Oncol 2012;51: 222–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindbolm J, Ekelund-Olvenmark A-M, Syren H, Iustin R, Braide K, Frank-Lissbrant I, et al. High precision transponder localization using a novel electromagnetic positioning system in patients with localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009;90:307–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk M, af Rosenshöld PM, Keall P, Cattel H, Cho BC, Poulsen P, et al. Real-time dynamic MLC tracking for inversely optimized arc radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2010;94:218–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depuydt T, Verellen D, Haas O, Gevaert T, Linthout N, Duchateau M, et al. Geometric accuracy of a novel gimbals based radiation therapy tumor tracking system. Radiother Oncol 2011;98:365–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keall PJ, Sawant A, Cho B, Ruan D, Wu J, Poulsen P, et al. Electromagnetic-guided dynamic multileaf collimator tracking enables motion management for intensity-modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:312–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledelius W, Keall PJ, Cho B, Yang X, Morf D, Scheib S, et al. Tracking latency in image-based dynamic MLC tracking with direct image access. Acta Oncol 2011;50:952–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohn S, Wasbø E. Simulation of respiratory motion during IMRT dose delivery. Acta Oncol 2011;50:935–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravkilde T, Keall PJ, Højbjerre K, Fledelius W, Worm E, Poulsen PR. Geometric accuracy of dynamic MLC tracking with an implantable wired electromagnetic transponder. Acta Oncol 2011;50:944–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendrin C, Furtado H, Weber C, Bloch C, Figl M, Pawiro SA, et al. Monitoring tumor motion by real time 2D/3D registration during radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2012;102:274–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen PR, Fledelius W, Cho B, Keall P. Image-based dynamic multileaf collimator tracking of moving targets during intensity-modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:265–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran SJ. The history and principles of chemical dosimetry for 3-D radiation fields: Gels, polymers and plastics. Appl Radiat Isot 2009;67:393–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldock C, De Deene Y, Doran S, Ibbott G, Jirasek A, Lepage M, et al. Polymer gel dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:R1–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates ES, Balling P, Petersen JBB, Christensen MN, Skyt PS, Bassler N, et al. Characterization of the optical properties and stability of Presage™ following irradiation with photons and carbon ions. Acta Oncol 2011;50: 829–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceberg S, Karlsson A, Gustavsson H, Wittgren L, Bäck SÅJ. Verification of dynamic radiotherapy: The potential of 3D dosimetry under respiratory-like motion using polymer gel. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:N387–96.
   Google Scholar
• Brady SL, Brown WE, Clift CG, Yoo S, Oldham M. Investigation into the feasibility of using PRESAGE™/Optical-CT dosimetry for verification of gating treatments. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:2187–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceberg S, Falk M, af Rosenschöld PM, Cattell H, Gustafsson H, Keall P, et al. Tumor-tracking radiotherapy of moving targets; verification using 3D polymer gel, 2D ion-chamber array and biplanar diode array. J Phys Conf Ser 2010; 250:012051.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Wuu C-S, Maryanski MJ. Performance of a commercial optical CT scanner and polymer gel dosimeters for 3-D dose verification. Med Phys 2004;31:3024–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopatiuk-Tirpak O, Langen KM, Meeks SL, Kupelian PA, Zeidan OA, Maryanski MJ. Performance evaluation of an improved optical computed tomography polymer gel dosimeter system for 3D dose verification of static and dynamic phantom deliveries. Med Phys 2008;35:3847–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuu CS, Xu Y. Three-dimensional dose verification for intensity modulated radiation therapy using optical CT based polymer gel dosimetry. Med Phys 2006;33:1412–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen LS, Johansen J, Kallehauge J, Primdahl H, Busk M, Lassen P, et al. FAZA PET/CT hypoxia imaging in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy: Results from the DAHANCA 24 trial. Radiother Oncol 2012;105:14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson S, Skyt PS, Ceberg S, Doran S, Muren LP, Balling P, et al. Feasibility study using MRI and two optical CT scanners for readout of polymer gel and Presage™. J Phys Conf Ser 2013;444:012079.
   Google Scholar
• Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys 1998;25:656–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson H, Karlsson A, Bäck SA, Olsson LE, Haraldsson P, Engström P, et al. MAGIC-type polymer gel for three-dimensional dosimetry: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy verification. Med Phys 2003;30:1264–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar