Time-resolved dose reconstruction by motion encoding of volumetric modulated arc therapy fields delivered with and without dynamic multi-leaf collimator tracking

References

• Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM, Emery RS, Forster KM, Jiang SB, et al. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. Med Phys 2006;33:3874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depuydt T, Poels K, Verellen D, Engels B, Collen C, Haverbeke C, et al. Initial assessment of tumor tracking with a gimbaled linac system in clinical circumstances: A patient simulation study. Radiother Oncol 2013;106:236–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuaid D, Webb S. IMRT delivery to a moving target by dynamic MLC tracking: Delivery for targets moving in two dimensions in the beam's eye view. Phys Med Biol 2006;51: 4819–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawant A, Venkat R, Srivastava V, Carlson D, Povzner S, Cattell H, et al. Management of three-dimensional intrafraction motion through real-time DMLC tracking. Med Phys 2008;35:2050–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss A, Nill S, Tacke M, Oelfke U. Electromagnetic real-time tumor position monitoring and dynamic multileaf collimator tracking using a Siemens 160 MLC: Geometric and dosimetric accuracy of an integrated system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:579–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crijns SPM, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJW. Proof of concept of MRI-guided tracked radiation delivery: Tracking one-dimensional motion. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:7863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lujan AE, Larsen EW, Balter JM, Haken RKT. A method for incorporating organ motion due to breathing into 3D dose calculations. Med Phys 1999;26:715–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Shi C, Lin B, Ha CS, Papanikolaou N. Delivery of four-dimensional radiotherapy with TrackBeam for moving target using an AccuKnife dual-layer MLC: Dynamic phantoms study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009;10:2926.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chetty IJ, Rosu M, Tyagi N, Marsh LH, McShan DL, Balter JM, et al. A fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: A Monte Carlo study. Med Phys 2003;30:1776–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langen KM, Chauhan B, Siebers JV, Moore J, Kupelian PA. The dosimetric effect of intrafraction prostate motion on step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans: Magnitude, correlation with motion parameters, and comparison with helical tomotherapy plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:1220–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristophanous M, Rottmann J, Court LE, Berbeco RI. EPID-guided 3D dose verification of lung SBRT. Med Phys 2011;38:495–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqvi SA, D’Souza WD. A stochastic convolution/superposition method with isocenter sampling to evaluate intrafraction motion effects in IMRT. Med Phys 2005;32:1156–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbeco RI, Hacker F, Zatwarnicki C, Park S-J, Ionascu D, O’Farrell D, et al. A novel method for estimating SBRT delivered dose with beam's-eye-view images. Med Phys 2008;35:3225–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen PR, Schmidt ML, Keall P, Worm ES, Fledelius W, Hoffmann L. A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments. Med Phys 2012; 39:6237–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford JL, Lee YK, Wai P, South CP, Warrington AP. Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:N167–76.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski K, Noel C, Lu W, Lechleiter K, Hubenschmidt J, Low D, et al. Development of the 4D Phantom for patient-specific, end-to-end radiation therapy QA. In: Proceedings of SPIE. San Diego, CA, USA; 2007. p. 65100E–65100E–9.
   Google Scholar
• Keall PJ, Sawant A, Cho B, Ruan D, Wu J, Poulsen P, et al. Electromagnetic-guided dynamic multileaf collimator tracking enables motion management for intensity-modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:312–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen PR, Fledelius W, Cho B, Keall P. Image-based dynamic multileaf collimator tracking of moving targets during intensity-modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:e265–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravkilde T, Keall PJ, Højbjerre K, Fledelius W, Worm E, Poulsen PR. Geometric accuracy of dynamic MLC tracking with an implantable wired electromagnetic transponder. Acta Oncol 2011;50:944–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzenberg DW, Moran JM, Fraass BA. Verification of dynamic and segmental IMRT delivery by dynamic log file analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2002;3:63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys 1998;25:656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravkilde T, Keall PJ, Grau C, Høyer M, Poulsen PR. PD-0342 Time-resolved evolvement of target dose distributions during IMAT with and without dynamic MLC tracking. Radiother Oncol 2012;103:S137.
   Google Scholar
• Teke T, Bergman AM, Kwa W, Gill B, Duzenli C, Popescu IA. Monte Carlo based, patient-specific RapidArc QA using Linac log files. Med Phys 2010;37:116–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreibmann E, Dhabaan A, Elder E, Fox T. Patient-specific quality assurance method for VMAT treatment delivery. Med Phys 2009;36:4530–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feygelman V, Stambaugh C, Zhang G, Hunt D, Opp D, Wolf TK, et al. Motion as a perturbation: Measurement-guided dose estimates to moving patient voxels during modulated arc deliveries. Med Phys 2013;40:021708.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Weiss E, Siebers JV. Dose deformation- invariance in adaptive prostate radiation therapy: Implication for treatment simulations. Radiother Oncol 2012; 105:207–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XA, Liu F, Tai A, Ahunbay E, Chen G, Kelly T, et al. Development of an online adaptive solution to account for inter- and intra-fractional variations. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100:370–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyeng TB, Kallehauge JF, Høyer M, Petersen JBB, Poulsen PR, Muren LP. Clinical validation of a 4D-CT based method for lung ventilation measurement in phantoms and patients. Acta Oncol 2011;50:897–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörnqvist S, Bentzen L, Petersen JBB, Hysing LB, Muren LP. Plan robustness of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of prostate and lymph nodes for different image-guidance and delivery techniques. Acta Oncol 2011; 50:926–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk M, af Rosenschöld PM, Keall P, Cattell H, Cho BC, Poulsen P, et al. Real-time dynamic MLC tracking for inversely optimized arc radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2010; 94:218–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogliata A, Scorsetti M, Navarria P, Catalano M, Clivio A, Cozzi L, et al. Dosimetric comparison between VMAT with different dose calculation algorithms and protons for soft-tissue sarcoma radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2013;52: 545–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann L, Jørgensen M-BK, Muren LP, Petersen JBB. Clinical validation of the Acuros XB photon dose calculation algorithm, a grid-based Boltzmann equation solver. Acta Oncol 2012;51:376–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar